Moeketsi and Another v S (A 8/2015) [2018] ZAGPPHC 656 (3 March 2018)

Moeketsi and Another v S (A 8/2015) [2018] ZAGPPHC 656 (3 March 2018)

Loading PDF...

This document is 5.0 MB. Do you want to load it?

Error loading PDF
Try reloading the page or downloading the PDF.
Error:
▲ To the top

Cited documents 4

Act
4
Citizenship and Immigration · Education · Environment, Climate and Wildlife · Health and Food Safety · Human Rights · International Law · Labour and Employment · Public administration
Dispute Resolution and Mediation
Repealed

Documents citing this one 3

Judgment
3
Occupiers' unsupported rent‑boycott defence rejected; eviction granted but stay/suspension ordered pending end of adjusted alert level 3.
* Property law / PIE – eviction of unlawful occupiers; bona fide defence to eviction (ownership dispute; withholding rent for repairs) – insufficiency of evidence. * Consideration of personal circumstances and role of municipality under s4(7) PIE – when City report/assistance required. * Interaction with COVID‑19 Disaster Management regulations – discretionary stay/suspension of eviction pending end of adjusted alert level 3. * Conduct amounting to rent boycott, self-help (changing locks, intimidation) relevant to justice and equity enquiry.
A bona fide occupier’s improvement lien secures lawful occupation until compensated; the purchaser (applicant) was not liable.
* Property law – improvement/retention lien – bona fide possessor who effects necessary and useful improvements acquires a real right to retain possession until compensated. * Eviction – retention lien is an absolute defence to eviction by owner or subsequent purchaser, subject to limited exceptions. * Enrichment – claim for payment for improvements lies against the owner who was enriched, not necessarily against a subsequent purchaser. * Costs – where neither party succeeds, no costs awarded.