Loading PDF...
This document is 659.4 KB. Do you want to load it?
Cited documents 3
Act
2|
Health and Food Safety
·
Human Rights
·
Labour and Employment
·
Public administration
|
Judgment
1|
Applicant failed to prove council authorisation and, with crops largely removed and material disputes on arrears, could not perfect a tacit hypothec.
Municipal litigation — authority to institute proceedings — necessity to prove council resolution or adequate evidence of authorisation; Landlord’s tacit hypothec — attaches only to movables present on leased premises and lapses upon removal; Plascon‑Evans — disputed material facts to be resolved in favour of respondents; Fixtures v movables — applicant must convince court before removal/attachment; Relief overtaken by events/mootness where goods already removed.
|