S v Mazamela (RCA42/2020) [2023] ZAWCRD 7 (25 August 2023)

S v Mazamela (RCA42/2020) [2023] ZAWCRD 7 (25 August 2023)
This judgment has been anonymised to protect personal information in compliance with the law.

Loading PDF...

This document is 785.7 KB. Do you want to load it?

Error loading PDF
Try reloading the page or downloading the PDF.
Error:

Cited documents 8

Act
4
Citizenship and Immigration · Education · Environment, Climate and Wildlife · Health and Food Safety · Human Rights · International Law · Labour and Employment · Public administration
Dispute Resolution and Mediation · Peace and Security
Human Rights · Peace and Security
Judgment
4
Reported
President lawfully appointed commission; no irrevocable abdication and no pre-appointment hearing required.
Constitutional law — Presidential powers — appointment of commissions under s 84(2)(f) — not administrative action under s 33 but constrained by legality and good faith; Commissions Act — statutory jurisdictional fact that subject matter be a >matter of public concern= — objectively required before vesting coercive powers; Audi alteram partem — no duty to afford pre-appointment hearing absent legitimate expectation or clear necessity; Terms of reference — must be sufficiently certain to define inquiry; Separation of powers — exceptional restraint required before compelling head of state to give oral evidence.
Conviction and life sentence upheld despite exclusion of an illegally obtained warning statement; child witness evidence deemed trustworthy.
Criminal law – Sexual offences – Single child witness evidence and trustworthiness (Woji principles; rejection of double cautionary rule); illegally obtained warning statement and its exclusion; late and uncorroborated alibi (Thebus); minimum sentencing under s 51(1) and Schedule 2 – no substantial and compelling circumstances to deviate from life imprisonment.
Convictions based solely on a single, inconsistently led child witness were unsafe; appeal upheld and convictions set aside.
Criminal law – Sexual offences – Reliance on single child complainant’s evidence – Requirement that such evidence be clear and satisfactory in every material respect; Prosecutorial conduct – leading of child witness and effect on fairness of trial; Appeal – when convictions based on unsatisfactory single‑witness evidence are unsafe; Fresh evidence – limits on reception on appeal.
Child complainant’s single-witness evidence upheld as sufficient to sustain sexual assault and rape convictions.
Criminal law – sexual offences against a child; single witness/child evidence – application of cautionary approach; medical evidence – intact hymen does not rule out sexual penetration; evaluation of alleged coaching or motive to fabricate; appellate review of factual credibility findings.

Documents citing this one 0

To the top