S v J N (RCA 62/2023) [2024] ZAWCRD 16 (12 September 2024)

S v J N (RCA 62/2023) [2024] ZAWCRD 16 (12 September 2024)
This judgment has been anonymised to protect personal information in compliance with the law.

Loading PDF...

This document is 789.3 KB. Do you want to load it?

Error loading PDF
Try reloading the page or downloading the PDF.
Error:

Cited documents 6

Judgment
4
Reported
President lawfully appointed commission; no irrevocable abdication and no pre-appointment hearing required.
Constitutional law — Presidential powers — appointment of commissions under s 84(2)(f) — not administrative action under s 33 but constrained by legality and good faith; Commissions Act — statutory jurisdictional fact that subject matter be a >matter of public concern= — objectively required before vesting coercive powers; Audi alteram partem — no duty to afford pre-appointment hearing absent legitimate expectation or clear necessity; Terms of reference — must be sufficiently certain to define inquiry; Separation of powers — exceptional restraint required before compelling head of state to give oral evidence.
Reported
Rape conviction replaced by indecent assault where penetration was not proved and medical evidence was unexplained.
Criminal law – Sexual offences – Rape requires proof of penetration; medical evidence and testimony of examining doctor often critical. Child witness – evidence to be treated with caution and interpreter accuracy important. Procedure – failure to call medical witness may render rape conviction unsafe; permissible verdicts include indecent assault. Constitutional/administrative law – excessive delay in providing records and processing appeals infringes right of access to court.
Whether the appellant’s convictions were safe where the child complainant was intoxicated and medical corroboration was disputed.
Criminal law – evidence – single child witness – cautionary approach where witness intoxicated; corroboration – medical evidence (J88 and clinical notes) as potential corroboration for strangulation; appellate review of credibility findings – limits on disturbing trial court findings; evaluation of inconsistencies and alternative causes for injuries (vomiting/rubbing) in assessing proof beyond reasonable doubt.
Reported
Court removes trustee for serious fiduciary breaches; rejects court-appointed administrator, reserving that power to the Master.
Trusts – removal of trustee under s 20(1) Trust Property Control Act – fiduciary duties – misappropriation, unauthorised payments, unilateral acts and litigating without authority; Master’s exclusive discretion under s 16(2) to investigate/appoint administrator – limits on High Court ordering appointment; intervention by beneficiary; costs de bonis propriis and attorney-and-client costs.

Documents citing this one 0

To the top