This judgment has been anonymised to protect personal information in compliance with the law.
Loading PDF...
This document is 789.3 KB. Do you want to load it?
Cited documents 6
Judgment
4|
Reported
President lawfully appointed commission; no irrevocable abdication and no pre-appointment hearing required.
Constitutional law — Presidential powers — appointment of commissions under s 84(2)(f) — not administrative action under s 33 but constrained by legality and good faith; Commissions Act — statutory jurisdictional fact that subject matter be a >matter of public concern= — objectively required before vesting coercive powers; Audi alteram partem — no duty to afford pre-appointment hearing absent legitimate expectation or clear necessity; Terms of reference — must be sufficiently certain to define inquiry; Separation of powers — exceptional restraint required before compelling head of state to give oral evidence.
|
|
Reported
Rape conviction replaced by indecent assault where penetration was not proved and medical evidence was unexplained.
Criminal law – Sexual offences – Rape requires proof of penetration; medical evidence and testimony of examining doctor often critical. Child witness – evidence to be treated with caution and interpreter accuracy important. Procedure – failure to call medical witness may render rape conviction unsafe; permissible verdicts include indecent assault. Constitutional/administrative law – excessive delay in providing records and processing appeals infringes right of access to court.
|
|
Whether the appellant’s convictions were safe where the child complainant was intoxicated and medical corroboration was disputed.
Criminal law – evidence – single child witness – cautionary approach where witness intoxicated; corroboration – medical evidence (J88 and clinical notes) as potential corroboration for strangulation; appellate review of credibility findings – limits on disturbing trial court findings; evaluation of inconsistencies and alternative causes for injuries (vomiting/rubbing) in assessing proof beyond reasonable doubt.
|
|
Reported
Court removes trustee for serious fiduciary breaches; rejects court-appointed administrator, reserving that power to the Master.
Trusts – removal of trustee under s 20(1) Trust Property Control Act – fiduciary duties – misappropriation, unauthorised payments, unilateral acts and litigating without authority; Master’s exclusive discretion under s 16(2) to investigate/appoint administrator – limits on High Court ordering appointment; intervention by beneficiary; costs de bonis propriis and attorney-and-client costs.
|
Act
2|
Human Rights
·
Peace and Security
|