S v Fosilang (RCA 69/2023) [2024] ZAWCRD 3 (27 March 2024)

S v Fosilang (RCA 69/2023) [2024] ZAWCRD 3 (27 March 2024)

Loading PDF...

This document is 675.3 KB. Do you want to load it?

Error loading PDF
Try reloading the page or downloading the PDF.
Error:

Cited documents 5

Act
3
Dispute Resolution and Mediation · Peace and Security
Human Rights · Peace and Security
Judgment
2
Reported
President lawfully appointed commission; no irrevocable abdication and no pre-appointment hearing required.
Constitutional law — Presidential powers — appointment of commissions under s 84(2)(f) — not administrative action under s 33 but constrained by legality and good faith; Commissions Act — statutory jurisdictional fact that subject matter be a >matter of public concern= — objectively required before vesting coercive powers; Audi alteram partem — no duty to afford pre-appointment hearing absent legitimate expectation or clear necessity; Terms of reference — must be sufficiently certain to define inquiry; Separation of powers — exceptional restraint required before compelling head of state to give oral evidence.
A respondent's invocation of the right to remain silent does not bar summary judgment absent state compulsion.
Summary judgment – Rule 32 – adequacy of verifying affidavit; personal knowledge of deponent; bare denial not a bona fide defence (Maharaj); Right to silence/self-incrimination – civil proceedings vs state compulsion (Davis; Seapoint; Randell) – no stay absent compulsion; Liquidated claim – misappropriated funds recoverable by summary judgment; Prescription and minor formal defects not fatal.

Documents citing this one 0

To the top