Education and Training Act, 1979

Act 90 of 1979

Please note that the research on this work is ongoing. Amendment, commencement and repeal information may be missing.
There are outstanding amendments that have not yet been applied. See the History tab for more information.
Education and Training Act, 1979
Related documents

Loading PDF...

This document is 14.2 MB. Do you want to load it?

Error loading PDF
Try reloading the page or downloading the PDF.
Error:
▲ To the top

History of this document

28 November 2002 amendment not yet applied
01 January 1997 amendment not yet applied
31 October 1994 amendment not yet applied
02 September 1994 amendment not yet applied
01 July 1992 amendment not yet applied
01 May 1992 amendment not yet applied
23 May 1990 amendment not yet applied
31 March 1989 amendment not yet applied
01 August 1988 amendment not yet applied
01 January 1988 amendment not yet applied
01 April 1985 amendment not yet applied
01 January 1982 amendment not yet applied
25 February 1981 amendment not yet applied
23 May 1980 amendment not yet applied
01 January 1980
29 June 1979 this version
20 June 1979
Assented to

Cited documents 0

Documents citing this one 49

Act
4
Education · Human Rights · Labour and Employment · Public administration
Dispute Resolution and Mediation · Finance and Money
Education
Education
Judgment
2
Reported
Section 99(5) of the Customs Act is a statutory expiry period extinguishing liability, not subject to Prescription Act interruptions.
Customs law – section 99(5) of Customs and Excise Act 91 of 1964 – statutory expiry/limitation period extinguishing liability after two years; Prescription Act 68 of 1969 (ss 13(1)(g), 16(1)) – inapplicable where inconsistent; accessory (surety) liability ceases when principal’s liability ceases.
Reported
Director-General must afford affected candidates a hearing before cancelling group examination results.
Administrative law; natural justice – audi alteram partem – applies where Director-General contemplates cancelling recognition of examination results; Examination regulations (regulation 17) – interpretation of "group of candidates" as individuals sharing a common attribute, not an entity justifying collective punishment; Cancellation of results without affording affected candidates a hearing is invalid.