Criminal Procedure Amendment Act, 1986

Act 33 of 1986

Criminal Procedure Amendment Act, 1986

Loading PDF...

This document is 4.9 MB. Do you want to load it?

Error loading PDF
Try reloading the page or downloading the PDF.
Error:

History of this document

01 February 1989
Commenced by Criminal Procedure Amendment Act, 1986

Note: Commencement date of ss. 20 and 21. See section 26 (2) of this Act.

01 September 1987
Commenced by Criminal Procedure Amendment Act, 1986

Note: Commencement date of section 6. See section 26 (2) of this Act

04 April 1986 this version
Published in Government Gazette 10180
Commenced by Criminal Procedure Amendment Act, 1986

Note: Commencement date of whole Act, except ss. 6, 20 and 21. See s. 26(19) of this Act

25 March 1986
Assented to

Cited documents 0

Documents citing this one 15

Judgment
4
Reported
Criminalisation of consensual private male sodomy breaches equality, dignity and privacy; related statutes invalidated.
Constitutional law — Equality (sexual orientation) — Criminalisation of consensual private male sodomy violates equality, dignity and privacy; s20A Sexual Offences Act and statutory listings invalid; limited retrospective relief and judicial discretion for statutory consequences.
The appeal against conviction and life sentences for rape of minors was dismissed, affirming the trial court’s decisions in full.
Criminal law – Rape – Minors – Conviction based on credibility findings and corroborated medical evidence – Sentencing – Prescribed minimum sentence – Substantial and compelling circumstances – Appeal dismissed – Concurrent sentences in cases of life imprisonment.
Court holds section 304A review inappropriate, remands for sentencing, emphasizing sparing use to avoid piecemeal adjudication.
Criminal Procedure - special review under section 304A - pre-sentence referral for review due to magistrate's post-verdict doubts - scope and limitations of section 304A.
Reported
Unsworn post‑conviction retraction insufficient for s304A review; magistrate must first take evidence or then refer.
Criminal procedure — conviction referred under section 304A after conviction but before sentence — whether unsworn post‑conviction retraction suffices to form opinion that proceedings 'are not in accordance with justice' — unsworn and untested statements insufficient; magistrate should take or cause evidence to be placed on record before referral; post‑conviction events may be relevant but must be tested.
To the top