Social Assistance Act, 1992

Act 59 of 1992

Repealed
This Act was repealed on 2006-04-01 by Social Assistance Act, 2004.
Social Assistance Act, 1992
Related documents

Loading PDF...

This document is 4.6 MB. Do you want to load it?

Error loading PDF
Try reloading the page or downloading the PDF.
Error:

History of this document

01 April 2006
26 September 1992
Assented to
06 May 1992 this version

Cited documents 0

Documents citing this one 97

Judgment
13
Reported
Excluding permanent residents from social grants as non‑citizens unjustifiably infringes social‑security, equality and dignity rights.
Constitutional law — socio‑economic rights — right of access to social security (s27) vested in “everyone” — exclusion of permanent residents from social grants on basis of citizenship — unfair discrimination (s9), dignity (s10) and children’s rights (s28) — limitation and justification (s36) — remedy of reading‑in words to cure constitutional defect — jurisdiction to adjudicate Acts not yet brought into force (s172).
Reported
A court may extend a suspension of invalidity while it subsists, but cannot revive an already lapsed suspension.
* Constitutional law — suspension of declaration of invalidity — computation of time — civil (calendar) method applies to months; suspension expired midnight preceding corresponding date. * Constitutional law — section 172(1)(b)(ii) — court may suspend or vary a declaration of invalidity while suspension subsists, but cannot revive or retrospectively extend a suspension after it has lapsed. * Constitutional principle — finality of litigation and separation of powers — courts cannot resuscitate law already declared invalid. * Procedure — urgency and ex parte relief — applicants must act timeously and explain delay; self-created urgency is disfavoured.
Reported
Prescription does not run where the State has not disavowed an unlawful termination of a disability grant.
Administrative law; social grants – unlawful termination of disability grant; extinctive prescription – whether prescription runs while unlawful administrative decision remains effective; requirement for State to expressly disavow unlawful decision before prescription runs; State’s obligation to consider constitutional duties and claimant vulnerability before pleading prescription; costs on attorney-and-client scale against State.
Reported
Unreasonable delay in processing social assistance denied the substantive right and warranted monetary constitutional damages.
Constitutional right to social security – unreasonable administrative delay in grant processing – denial of substantive right; constitutional damages as remedy; measure by prescribed interest; mandamus and declaratory relief considered inadequate in context.
Reported
A presidential assignment of the Social Assistance Act to provinces was invalid because social assistance requires national uniform norms under section 126(3).
Constitutional law – Interim Constitution s 235 (transitional assignment of administration) – meaning of "in force" and "administered"; s 126(3) – national versus provincial competence – social assistance requires uniform national norms and minimum standards; presidential proclamation assigning Social Assistance Act invalid; suspension of declaration under s 172(1)(b).
Reported
A purposive constitutional approach permits class actions and inclusion of extra‑jurisdictional class members once original plaintiffs establish forum jurisdiction.
Constitutional standing and class actions; class definition requirements (numerosity, commonality, typicality, adequate representation); admissibility and role of hearsay in class litigation; inclusion of extra‑jurisdictional class members — forum jurisdiction and development of common law; disclosure orders as necessary adjuncts to class proceedings.
Child support grants paid after a breadwinner's death are causally linked and deductible from loss-of-support damages.
Motor vehicle accident — death of breadwinner — child support grants under Social Assistance Act — whether grants are causally linked to death and deductible from damages — res inter alios acta — prevention of double recovery and public policy considerations.
An appellate court will not disturb a trial court’s quantum award absent misdirection or lack of evidential basis.
Medical negligence; quantum of damages — future medical expenses and choice of private treatment; assessment of psychotherapy and speech therapy costs; methods for calculating past and future loss of earnings and contingency deductions; treatment of disability pension in damages; appellate restraint in reviewing quantum.
Temporary disability grants lapse by law; non-notification does not entitle continued payment or review.
Social assistance — disability grants — temporary grants lapse by operation of law under reg 28(1)(d) and are not termination decisions reviewable under PAJA; failure to notify under reg 13(3)(d) does not of itself create a substantive legitimate expectation of continued payment; distinguishing Mdodisa/Joni and Mpofu; Plascon‑Evans rule and Rule 6(5)(g) application.
Detained asylum seekers must be afforded a good-cause interview under the Refugees Act before deportation; Home Affairs must facilitate and, if neglecting to do so, detainees must be released.
Refugee law – non-refoulement (s2 Refugees Act) – detained asylum seekers entitled to opportunity to show good cause (s21(1B) and reg 8) before deportation; detention challenged by interdictum de homine libero exhibendo – burden on detaining authority to justify detention; Department of Home Affairs must facilitate good-cause interviews and issue s22 permits if good cause shown; procedural concerns about multiple identical urgent applications and potential abuse of process by attorneys.
Act
1
Finance and Money
To the top