Mutual Banks Act, 1993

Act 124 of 1993

There are outstanding amendments that have not yet been applied. See the History tab for more information.
Mutual Banks Act, 1993
Collections
Related documents

Loading PDF...

This document is 22.3 MB. Do you want to load it?

Error loading PDF
Try reloading the page or downloading the PDF.
Error:
▲ To the top

History of this document

01 June 2023 amendment not yet applied
29 April 2022 amendment not yet applied
28 September 2018 amendment not yet applied
01 April 2018 amendment not yet applied
20 March 2000 amendment not yet applied
02 December 1994 amendment not yet applied
03 January 1994
23 July 1993 this version
09 July 1993
Assented to

Cited documents 0

Documents citing this one 169

Act
19
Finance and Money
Finance and Money
Business, Trade and Industry
Business, Trade and Industry · Energy and Natural Resources · Environment, Climate and Wildlife · Finance and Money
Business, Trade and Industry · Finance and Money
Labour and Employment · Public administration
Business, Trade and Industry · Communications and Media · Infrastructure and Transportation
Finance and Money
Dispute Resolution and Mediation
Business, Trade and Industry · Energy and Natural Resources · Environment, Climate and Wildlife · Finance and Money · Health and Food Safety
Judgment
11
Reported
Reported

Application to wind up solvent companies in terms of s 81 of Companies Act 71 of 2008 (the 2008 Act); whether Minister of Environmental Affairs may invoke s 157(1)(d) of the Act for standing in the public interest – whether ex parte proceedings and failure to disclose material facts warrants discharge of provisional orders – whether just and equitable for companies to be wound up.

Reported

Provisional sequestration order sought on the grounds of s 83 and s 84 of the Banks Act 94 of 1990 – prima facie proof of non-compliance with the Prudential Authority’s directive issued under s 83 sufficient to found sequestration application – the fact that reliance was also placed on s 84 to establish insolvency of the respondents is of no moment as long it is shown on either ground that sequestration will be to the advantage of creditors – appeal against refusal to grant provisional sequestration upheld

Court dismissed the applicant's claim to a 50% shareholding, upholding the current recorded shareholding per the shareholding agreement.
Company law - Shareholding dispute - Application of Plascon-Evans rule in determining final relief on paper - Proper issuance of shares under the Companies Act.
Government Notice
3
Business, Trade and Industry · Energy and Natural Resources · Environment, Climate and Wildlife · Finance and Money
Finance and Money
Dispute Resolution and Mediation
Standard
1
Finance and Money