Related documents
- Is amended by Agricultural Labour Amendment Act, 1994
- Is amended by Basic Conditions of Employment Act, 1997
- Is amended by Labour Relations Act, 1995
- Is commenced by Agricultural Labour Act, 1993: Commencement
Loading PDF...
This document is 1.5 MB. Do you want to load it?
History of this document
01 December 1998 amendment not yet applied
Amended by
Basic Conditions of Employment Act, 1997
11 November 1996 amendment not yet applied
Amended by
Labour Relations Act, 1995
01 April 1995 amendment not yet applied
Amended by
Agricultural Labour Amendment Act, 1994
17 January 1994
Commenced by
Agricultural Labour Act, 1993: Commencement
Commenced
13 October 1993 this version
01 October 1993
Assented to
Cited documents 0
Documents citing this one 7
Gazette
4Act
2|
Business, Trade and Industry
·
Dispute Resolution and Mediation
·
Environment, Climate and Wildlife
·
Finance and Money
·
Human Rights
·
International Law
·
Labour and Employment
|
|
Labour and Employment
|
Judgment
1|
Reported
The applicant’s dismissal was not administrative action; LRA procedures and Labour Court remedies are the proper route.
Labour law – jurisdiction – s157(1) and (2) LRA – scope of Labour Court exclusivity; Administrative law – PAJA – when a dismissal by a state organ/business unit is administrative action; CCMA/arbitration – employee must ordinarily pursue LRA dispute-resolution mechanisms; Constitutional interplay – read LRA and PAJA in light of s210 LRA and s33 and s23 of the Constitution.
|