Loading PDF...
This document is 5.1 MB. Do you want to load it?
History of this document
17 December 1993 this version
Commenced
08 December 1993
Assented to
Cited documents 0
Documents citing this one 29
Gazette
22Judgment
5|
Reported
Delay in prosecuting the principal action and lack of reasonable apprehension of repetition defeated interim interdict.}
* Interim interdict – requisites – prima facie right, reasonable apprehension of irreparable harm, balance of convenience and no satisfactory remedy. * Single past contravention v continuing conduct – where only a past act is established, applicant must show objective reasonable apprehension of repetition. * Delay – undue delay in instituting principal action can forfeit right to pendente lite relief. * Evidence – inferences from video footage; onus to allege facts in founding papers. * Procedural – new factual grounds raised on appeal not permissible. * (Dissent) Statutory welfare body’s role and refusal to give undertaking relevant to grant of interdict.
|
|
Reported
A statutory animal‑welfare body may privately prosecute where its empowering statute, read with section 8 CPA, so provides.
Administrative law; criminal procedure; private prosecutions — statutory conferral of prosecutorial power — interpretation of "institute legal proceedings" in empowering statute — section 6(2)(e) SPCA Act read with section 8 CPA; juristic persons; purposive and contextual interpretation; NPA oversight under section 8.
|
|
A pension fund must identify dependants as at the date of death and conduct a proper investigation before allocating death benefits.
Pension Funds – section 37C – death benefits – identification of dependants – factual and legal dependency – scope and standard of fund’s investigation – appropriate time for dependency determination – procedural fairness – audi alteram partem – remittal for fresh decision.
|
|
Reported
Limiting private prosecutions to natural persons is rationally related to legitimate public-prosecution policy; appeal dismissed.
Constitutional law — private prosecutions — s 7(1)(a) Criminal Procedure Act — distinction between natural and juristic persons — rationality review under rule of law (s 1(c)) — equality (s 9(1)) — statutory context of s 179 Constitution and NPA Act — reviewability of decisions not to prosecute limited to legality and rationality.
|
|
Court ordered restoration of directors' access and documents, required audits be finalised, and interdicted dissolution pending compliance.
• Statutory bodies – SPCA Act – powers of board under ss 6, 11 and 12 – limits on exercising control over societies.
• Company law – directors’ locus standi – derivative actions and s 165 of Companies Act.
• Interim relief – interdicts to restore access to premises, documents and electronic systems to enable statutory and fiduciary duties.
• Procedural requirement – two 30‑day notices under s 11(2) must fall in the same calendar year; consequences of failing to comply.
• Costs – de bonis propriis and attorney-and-client costs require clear evidence of mala fides; not ordered here.
|
By-law
1|
Environment, Climate and Wildlife
·
Public administration
|
Subsidiary legislation
|
Title
|
|
|---|---|
| Board Notice 169 of 2010 |