This Act was repealed on 2014-04-07 by Tourism Act, 2014.
There are outstanding amendments that have not yet been applied. See the History tab for more information.
Tourism Act, 1993
Related documents
- Is amended by Tourism Amendment Act, 2000
- Is amended by Tourism Second Amendment Act, 2000
- Is repealed by Tourism Act, 2014
Loading PDF...
This document is 18.7 MB. Do you want to load it?
History of this document
07 April 2014
Repealed by
Tourism Act, 2014
13 December 2000 amendment not yet applied
Amended by
Tourism Second Amendment Act, 2000
17 March 2000 amendment not yet applied
Amended by
Tourism Amendment Act, 2000
01 September 1993
Commenced
25 June 1993 this version
17 June 1993
Assented to
Cited documents 0
Documents citing this one 85
Gazette
78Act
3|
Business, Trade and Industry
|
|
Agriculture and Land
·
Energy and Natural Resources
·
Environment, Climate and Wildlife
·
Public administration
|
|
Arts and Culture
·
Business, Trade and Industry
·
Finance and Money
·
Public administration
|
Judgment
3|
CCMA had jurisdiction; foreign office was not a separate undertaking and commissioner reasonably found dismissal substantively unfair.
Labour law – territorial jurisdiction of the LRA – CCMA jurisdiction where employee serves in overseas office of South African statutory employer; Astral/Genrec Mei: foreign office must be separate and divorced undertaking to exclude LRA. Arbitration procedure – jurisdiction assessed on pleadings; mero motu jurisdictional reviews discouraged. Evidence – civil standard for fraud/dishonesty: misrepresentation, prejudice, intention; absence of unequivocal guilty plea. Review – commissioner’s factual findings and sanction within band of reasonableness.
|
|
Appointments made without competitive procurement breached section 217 and were declared unlawful; disgorgement of profits ordered after accounting.
Public procurement – Constitution s217, PFMA and SCM policy – appointments without competitive process unlawful – self‑review and disclosure of record – Khumalo delay test – just and equitable relief requires disgorgement of profits (not full forfeiture) – procedure to account for reasonable costs and profits.
|
|
LRA and CCMA lacked jurisdiction where employment, contract and undertaking were located in the United Kingdom.
Labour law – territorial jurisdiction – extraterritorial application of the LRA – location of employer’s undertaking – factors: place of contract, place of work, currency/place of payment, separate office and controls – CCMA jurisdiction.
|
General Notice
1|
Business, Trade and Industry
|