This is the latest version of this Act.
Collections
Related documents
- Is amended by Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Amendment Act, 2013
- Is commenced by Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act, 2003: Commencement
South Africa
Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act, 2003
Act 53 of 2003
- Published in Government Gazette 25899 on 9 January 2004
- Assented to on 7 January 2004
- Commenced on 21 April 2004 by Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act, 2003: Commencement
- [This is the version of this document from 24 October 2015.]
- [Amended by Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Amendment Act, 2013 (Act 46 of 2013) on 24 October 2014]
- [Amended by Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Amendment Act, 2013 (Act 46 of 2013) on 24 October 2015]
1. Definitions
In this Act, unless the context indicates otherwise—"B-BBEE initiative" means any transaction, practice, scheme or other initiative which affects compliance with this Act or any other law promoting broad-based black economic empowernment;[definition of "B-BBEE initiative" inserted by section 1(a) of Act 46 of 2013]"B-BBEE verification professional" means a person who performs any work in connection with rating the status of enterprises in terms of broad-based black economic empowerment compliance on the authority of, or for a rating agency accredited by, a B-BBEE Verification Professional Regulator;[definition of "B-BBEE verification professional" inserted by section 1(a) of Act 46 of 2013]"B-BBEE Verification Professional Regulator" means a body appointed by the Minister for the accreditation of rating agencies or the authorisation of B-BBEE verification professionals;[definition of "B-BBEE Verification Professional Regulator" inserted by section 1(a) of Act 46 of 2013]"black people" is a generic term which means Africans, Coloureds and Indians—(a)who are citizens of the Republic of South Africa by birth or descent; or(b)who became citizens of the Republic of South Africa by naturalisation—(i)before 27 April 1994; or(ii)on or after 27 April 1994 and who would have been entitled to acquire citizenship by naturalisation prior to that date.[definition of "black people" substituted by section 1(b) of Act 46 of 2013]“broad-based black economic empowerment” means the viable economic empowerment of all black people in particular women, workers, youth, people with disabilities and people living in rural areas through diverse but integrated socio-economic strategies that include, but are not limited to—(a)increasing the number of black people that manage, own and control enterprises and productive assets;(b)facilitating ownership and management of enterprises and productive assets by communities, workers, cooperatives and other collective enterprises;(c)human resource and skills development;(d)achieving equitable representation in all occupational categories and levels in the workforce;(e)preferential procurement from enterprises that are owned or managed by black people; and(f)investment in enterprises that are owned or managed by black people;[definition of "broad-based black economic empowerment" substituted by section 1(c) of Act 46 of 2013]"Commission" means the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Commission established by section 13B;[definition of "Commission" inserted by section 1(d) of Act 46 of 2013]“Council” means the Black Economic Empowerment Advisory Council established by section 4;"Department" means the Department of Trade and Industry;[definition of "Department" inserted by section 1(e) of Act 46 of 2013]"fronting practice" means a transaction, arrangement or other act or conduct that directly or indirectly undermines or frustrates the achievement of the objectives of this Act or the implementation of any of the provisions of this Act, including but not limited to practices in connection with a B-BBEE initiative—(a)in terms of which black persons who are appointed to an enterprise are discouraged or inhibited from substantially participating in the core activities of that enterprise;(b)in terms of which the economic benefits received as a result of the broad-based black economic empowerment status of an enterprise do not flow to black people in the ratio specified in the relevant legal documentation;(c)involving the conclusion of a legal relationship with a black person for the purpose of that enterprise achieving a certain level of broad-based black economic empowerment compliance without granting that black person the economic benefits that would reasonably be expected to be associated with the status or position held by that black person; or(d)involving the conclusion of an agreement with another enterprise in order to achieve or enhance broad-based black economic empowerment status in circumstances in which—(i)there are significant limitations, whether implicit or explicit, on the identity of suppliers, service providers, clients or customers;(ii)the maintenance of business operations is reasonably considered to be improbable, having regard to the resources available;(iii)the terms and conditions were not negotiated at arm’s length and on a fair and reasonable basis;[definition of "fronting practice" inserted by section 1(e) of Act 46 of 2013]"knowing", "knowingly" or "knows", when used with respect to a person, and in relation to a particular matter, means that the person either—(a)had actual knowledge of that matter; or(b)was in a position in which the person reasonably ought to have—(i)had actual knowledge;(ii)investigated the matter to an extent that would have provided the person with actual knowledge; or(iii)taken other measures which, if taken, would reasonably be expected to have provided the person with actual knowledge of the matter;[definition of "knowing ", "knowingly" or "knows" inserted by section 1(e) of Act 46 of 2013]“members” means, members of the Council;“Minister” means the Minister of Trade and Industry;“organ of state” means—(a)a national or provincial department as defined in the Public Finance Management Act, 1999 (Act No. 1 of 1999);(b)a municipality as contemplated in the Constitution;(c)Parliament;(d)a provincial legislature; and(e)a constitutional institution listed in Schedule 1 to the Public Finance Management Act, 1999 (Act No. 1 of 1999);"premises" includes land, or any building, structure, vehicle, ship, boat, vessel, aircraft or container;[definition of "premises" inserted by section 1(f) of Act 46 of 2013]“prescribe” means prescribe by regulation;“public entity” means a public entity listed in Schedule 2 or 3 to the Public Finance Management Act, 1999 (Act No. 1 of 1999);"sector charters" means sectoral transformation charters referred to in section 9;[definition of "sector charters" inserted by section 1(g) of Act 46 of 2013]“strategy” means a strategy for broad-based black economic empowerment issued in terms of section 11; and“this Act” includes any code of good practice or regulation made under this Act.2. Objectives of Act
The objectives of this Act are to facilitate broad-based black economic empowerment by—3. Interpretation of Act
4. Establishment of Black Economic Empowerment Advisory Council
The Black Economic Empowerment Advisory Council is hereby established.5. Functions of Council
The Council must—6. Composition of Council and appointment of members
7. Constitution and rules of Council
8. Remuneration and reimbursement of expenses
Council members must be remunerated for their services, in accordance with the provisions of the National Treasury Regulations, and must be reimbursed for expenses incurred by them in carrying out their duties, as determined by the Minister, with the concurrence of the Minister of Finance.[section 8 substituted by section 4 of Act 46 of 2013]9. Codes of good practice
10. Status of codes of good practice
11. Strategy for broad-based black economic empowerment
12. Transformation charters
The Minister must publish in the Gazette for general information and promote a transformation charter for a particular sector of the economy, if the Minister is satisfied that the charter—13. Support services and funding of Council
13A. Cancellation of contract or authorisation
Any contract or authorisation awarded on account of false information knowingly furnished by or on behalf of an enterprise in respect of its broad-based black economic empowerment status, may be cancelled by the organ of state or public entity without prejudice to any other remedies that the organ of state or public entity may have.[section 13A inserted by section 8 of Act 46 of 2013]13B. Establishment and status of Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Commission
13C. Appointment of Commissioner and Acting Commissioner
13D. Appointment of Deputy Commissioner and staff of Commission
13E. Finances of Commission
13F. Functions of Commission
13G. Reporting
13H. Delegation
13I. Specialist committees
13J. Investigations by Commission
13K. Summonses
13L. Confidential information
13M. Conflicting interests of employees
The Commissioner, members of a specialist committee and any person appointed to or contracted with the Commission to assist the Commission in the carrying out of its functions, must not—13N. Offences in connection with Commission
13O. Other offences and penalties
13P. Prohibition on business with organs of state following conviction under this Act
14. Regulations, guidelines and practice notes
15. Short title and commencement
This Act is called the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act, 2003, and comes into operation on a date to be determined by the President by proclamation in the Gazette.History of this document
24 October 2015 this version
24 October 2014
21 April 2004
Commenced
09 January 2004
07 January 2004
Assented to
Cited documents 4
Act
4|
Citizenship and Immigration
·
Education
·
Environment, Climate and Wildlife
·
Health and Food Safety
·
Human Rights
·
International Law
·
Labour and Employment
·
Public administration
|
|
Finance and Money
|
|
Labour and Employment
|
Documents citing this one 560
Gazette
478Judgment
52|
Reported
Court may substitute administrative award only in exceptional circumstances where it is in as good a position and outcome is foregone conclusion.
Administrative law – PAJA s 8(1)(c)(ii)(aa) – substitution of administrative action – test for exceptional circumstances: (i) court in as good a position as administrator and (ii) foregone conclusion, considered cumulatively – other factors (delay, bias, incompetence, fairness) relevant – substitution extraordinary remedy – tender validity period not absolute bar – appellate interference limited where lower court exercised discretion in true sense.
|
|
Reported
Whether a subscription agreement required the respondent’s consent for a share sale and whether good faith could compel such consent.
* Contract – Interpretation – unitary exercise of text, context and purpose; clause 8.3 construed as remedial (repurchase obligation) not consent requirement.
* Evidence – Parol evidence and admissibility of post‑contract conduct: University of Johannesburg permits contextual evidence; weight assessed by court.
* Good faith – normative background to contract law but not a freestanding ground to alter or add terms; Beadica limits remedial use of good faith.
* Procedural – appeal not moot despite subsequent transactions; remedy ordering consent set aside.
|
|
Reported
Excluded credit agreements are not void for non-registration; the in duplum interest cap applies during litigation.
* National Credit Act – registration of credit providers – scope of s 4 exclusions – whether excluded agreements must be counted for s 40 registration thresholds – failure to register and invalidity under ss 40(4) and 89(2)(d). * Common law – in duplum rule – arrear interest capped at capital – whether cap suspended pendente lite – Oneanate reconsidered and overruled. * Post-judgment interest – runs from date of judgment at contractual rate on whole judgment debt. * Suretyship – liability relative to principal debtor (not decided as unnecessary).
|
|
Reported
Non-joinder and alleged prosecutorial misconduct did not render the trial unfair; POCA confiscation appeal granted leave.
Criminal procedure – fair trial – non-joinder of suspected co-perpetrators does not, without prejudice, render trial unfair; Prosecutorial conduct – NPA Act contemplates investigative-prosecutorial overlap; Late evidence – Rules 30/31 and s22 Supreme Court Act require exceptional, incontrovertible evidence; Sentencing – minimum sentence legislation applies to ongoing offences committed before and after commencement; POCA – confiscation orders raise constitutional property and proportionality issues, leave to appeal granted.
|
|
Reported
Minister lacked power under the Act to promulgate regulations imposing pre-qualification thresholds excluding tenderers upfront.
Constitutional law — public procurement — section 217(1)-(3) — Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act — scope of Minister’s regulation-making power under section 5(1) — interpretation of “necessary or expedient” — allocation of policy-determination to organs of state under section 2(1) — validity of pre-qualification threshold criteria (Regulations 3(b), 4 and 9) — ultra vires and inconsistent with section 217.
|
|
Reported
Superior courts may rarely permit directors to represent companies; here the applicant failed to show a prima facie right to halt the procurement register.
Company litigation – right of audience – general rule that companies must be represented by qualified practitioners; inherent jurisdiction (s 173) permits exceptional discretionary leave for non‑professional representation if timeously and properly motivated; interim interdict – requirement of prima facie right – applicant failed to establish that replacing roster with procurement register breached s 9 or s 217 of the Constitution or Equality Act; procurement law – compliance with PFMA, PPPFA and Treasury regulations and evidence of stakeholder consultations.
|
|
Reported
An organ of state may set aside a corrupt, fronting-tainted procurement award despite delay; condonation granted.
* Procurement law – award vitiated by corruption, irregularities and fronting – tailored specifications favouring a particular supplier. * Evidence – admissibility of hearsay and investigator-derived documents under s 3(1) Law of Evidence Amendment Act where direct evidence unavailable and allegations unrebutted. * Administrative law – delay in review proceedings by an organ of state – common-law reasonableness and condonation where obstruction and public interest in remedying corruption prevail. * Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment – fronting; substance over form in assessing genuine transfer of economic benefits.
|
|
Reported
Direct access dismissed: alleged factual errors did not show reasonable apprehension of judicial bias; costs awarded.
Judicial bias — reasonable apprehension of bias; direct access to Constitutional Court — interests of justice; appellate factual findings — when factual error can found perceived bias; tender litigation — delictual claims require causally relevant dishonest conduct; costs — attorney-and-own-client; professional-conduct referral.
|
|
Reported
Section 217 applies to state concession RFBs; RFB set aside for non‑compliance with PP Act and B‑BBEE requirements.
Constitutional procurement (s 217) – applies to state grants of concessions/lettings providing services; PAJA – RFB can be reviewable where pre‑qualification has direct adverse legal effect; Preferential Procurement Act/Regulations – prescribe price/preference regimes (80/20 or 90/10) and requirement to specify objective criteria; B‑BBEE Act and Sector Codes – organs of state must apply sector codes and obtain ministerial consent to deviate; Rationality/process review – decisions must be lawfully authorised, factually grounded and rationally connected to purpose; Remedy – unlawful RFB set aside.
|
|
Applicant failed to prove entitlement to interim interdict restraining respondents from alleging fronting or representing themselves as shareholders.
* Interim interdict – requirements: prima facie right, well‑grounded apprehension of irreparable harm, balance of convenience, no satisfactory alternative remedy. * Shareholder/director status – disputed removals and procedural compliance affect interim relief. * Defamation/communications – entitlement to complain to regulatory bodies; no automatic interdiction of such complaints absent clear threat of irreparable harm. * Evidentiary sufficiency – hearsay and lack of confirmatory affidavits undermine urgent relief.
|
By-law
18|
Finance and Money
|
|
Business, Trade and Industry
|
|
Business, Trade and Industry
·
Citizenship and Immigration
·
Environment, Climate and Wildlife
·
Health and Food Safety
·
Human Rights
·
Labour and Employment
·
Public administration
|
|
Finance and Money
|
|
Finance and Money
|
|
Finance and Money
|
|
Finance and Money
|
|
Repealed
Finance and Money
|
|
Repealed
Finance and Money
|
|
Repealed
Finance and Money
|
Act
11|
Business, Trade and Industry
·
Finance and Money
|
|
Finance and Money
|
|
Uncommenced
Business, Trade and Industry
·
Finance and Money
·
Public administration
|
|
Business, Trade and Industry
|
|
Business, Trade and Industry
·
Health and Food Safety
|
|
Uncommenced
Health and Food Safety
·
Human Rights
·
Public administration
|
|
Finance and Money
|
|
Finance and Money
|
|
Business, Trade and Industry
·
Finance and Money
·
Infrastructure and Transportation
·
Public administration
|
|
Agriculture and Land
·
Business, Trade and Industry
·
Infrastructure and Transportation
·
Public administration
|
General Notice
1|
Dispute Resolution and Mediation
|
Subsidiary legislation
|
Title
|
|
|---|---|
|
Business, Trade and Industry
|
Government Notice 5221 of 2024 |