Related documents
Loading PDF...
This document is 21.2 MB. Do you want to load it?
History of this document
01 July 2015 amendment not yet applied
01 July 2009 amendment not yet applied
13 October 2008 amendment not yet applied
Amended by
Local Government Laws Amendment Act, 2008
02 July 2005
17 May 2004 this version
11 May 2004
Assented to
Cited documents 0
Documents citing this one 3705
Gazette
3563By-law
74|
Business, Trade and Industry
·
Environment, Climate and Wildlife
·
Finance and Money
·
Public administration
|
|
Finance and Money
|
|
Finance and Money
|
|
Finance and Money
|
|
Finance and Money
|
|
Finance and Money
|
|
Repealed
Finance and Money
|
|
Finance and Money
|
|
Finance and Money
|
|
Agriculture and Land
·
Business, Trade and Industry
·
Finance and Money
|
Judgment
65|
Reported
Section 118(3) does not make a municipal charge bind successors; new owners are not liable for predecessors' municipal debts.
Local government — Municipal Systems Act s118(3) — meaning of "charge upon the property"; limited real rights and publicity/registration requirement; whether municipal charge survives transfer to bind successors in title; section 25 Constitution — arbitrary deprivation of property; interpretation to avoid constitutional invalidity.
|
|
Reported
Respondent’s failure to comply with s49 MPRA invalidated the supplementary valuation roll and dependent subsequent rolls.
* Municipal rates – Municipal Property Rates Act 6 of 2004 – section 49 publication and individual notice requirements – jurisdictional prerequisites for valid valuation roll. * Supplementary valuation roll – invalidity for non‑compliance with MPRA – retrospective effect. * Subsequent valuation rolls – invalid to the extent they rely on earlier invalid acts (Seale principle). * PAJA – condonation for delay where state’s non‑disclosure prevents timely review. * Amendment of relief – permissible where respondent could have rebutted linkage but did not. * Relief in rem – declarations fixing status of public acts binding inter omnes.
|
|
Reported
Whether municipal rates were validly imposed: interpretive scope of transitional repeal and whether substantial compliance suffices.
Local government – municipal rates and levies – interplay of Finance Act s179 and Rates Act transitional provisions – survival and repeal of Transition Act s10G(7) – substantial compliance vs strict compliance with procedural requirements (notice, public participation, promulgation) – validity of rates for successive financial years.
|
|
Body Corporate Croftdene Mall v eThekwini Municipality (603/2010) [2011] ZASCA 188 (10 October 2011)
Reported
Section 102 permits account consolidation and service disconnection for unpaid rates absent a properly raised dispute over a specific amount.
* Local government – Systems Act s 102 – municipalities may consolidate accounts, allocate payments and implement credit-control measures including termination of services for arrears.
* Administrative law – Meaning of "dispute" under s 102(2) – requires a bona fide dispute concerning a specific amount; general objections insufficient.
* Municipal finance – Body corporate obligations in sectional-title schemes to levy owners and pay municipal charges.
* Procedural – Policy and by-law dispute-resolution provisions do not automatically suspend enforcement measures.
* Debt law – in duplum defence must be pleaded and proved; unsupported suggestion insufficient.
|
|
Reported
A municipality must follow statutory budget‑tabling and public‑participation procedures before materially amending tabled property rates.
Constitutional and administrative law; municipal finance and rates – levying of property rates as part of annual budget process; statutory participation obligations under Local Government: Systems Act and Municipal Finance Management Act; Municipal Property Rates Act – differential rates and permissible residential/non‑residential ratio; legality and rationality of targeted rate increases; appropriate relief where municipality amends tabled budget without meaningful public participation.
|
|
Reported
Municipality failed proper public participation, but Rates Act/regulations do not forbid higher business than residential property rates.
Municipal finance and rates — statutory public participation and publication obligations in budget process; Municipal Property Rates Act s19(1)(b) and regulations — scope of prescribed rate ratios; whether regulations limit municipal ability to levy higher business rates than residential; legality review of municipal decisions; duties of state deponents and costs in public-interest litigation.
|
|
Reported
A municipality may add a 'non‑permitted use' rating category under s 8 of the Rates Act and levy differential rates.
Local government – Municipal Property Rates Act s 8(1),(2) – meaning of "include" and whether s 8(2) exhaustive – categories of rateable property – 'use' and 'permitted use' include 'non‑permitted use' – municipality competent to create 'non‑permitted use' category – rating is legislative/taxing act, not administrative action – statutory objection and valuation appeal procedures are available remedies.
|
|
Reported
Whether the Premier’s approval requirement for rates over two cents survived the constitutional transition.
Local government — Rating of property — Interaction of old-order provincial ordinances (Municipal Ordinance 20 of 1974 s 82(1)(a)) with national Transition Act (s 10G(6),(6A),(7)) — Whether Premier/Administrator’s approval for rates above 2 cents impliedly repealed by constitutional transition — s 229(2)(a) challenge — justiciability and non-joinder — valuation, notice and differentiation of rates.
|
|
Reported
A municipality may impose a penalty tariff for unlawful property use under a valid rates policy without reclassifying the valuation roll.
Municipal law – Municipal Property Rates Act – differential rates and tariffs – validity of ‘‘illegal/unauthorised use’’ penalty tariff in municipal rates policy – whether re-categorisation on valuation roll required – scope of s 8 and s 19 MPRA – principle of legality and impermissible differentiation.
|
|
Application for leave to appeal dismissed as moot; judges deciding leave must determine practical-effect issue themselves.
Mootness and practical effect – s 16(2)(a) Superior Courts Act; Leave to appeal – s 17(1) and s 17(2)(d) procedure; Tender cancellation – reviewability under PAJA (distinction between cancellation before adjudication and after award); Regulation 32 Municipal Supply Chain Management Regulations – applicability and interpretation; Appellate practice – judges considering leave should determine practical-effect question themselves, not routinely refer to full court.
|
Act
2|
Finance and Money
|
|
Agriculture and Land
·
Environment, Climate and Wildlife
·
Public administration
|
Local Authority Notice
1|
Agriculture and Land
·
Business, Trade and Industry
·
Education
·
Public administration
|
Subsidiary legislation
|
Title
|
|
|---|---|
|
Agriculture and Land
·
Business, Trade and Industry
·
Finance and Money
·
Public administration
|