Safety at Sports and Recreational Events Act, 2010

Act 2 of 2010

Safety at Sports and Recreational Events Act, 2010

Loading PDF...

This document is 1.1 MB. Do you want to load it?

Error loading PDF
Try reloading the page or downloading the PDF.
Error:

History of this document

27 May 2010 this version
24 May 2010
Assented to

Cited documents 0

Documents citing this one 111

By-law
9
Infrastructure and Transportation
Business, Trade and Industry · Environment, Climate and Wildlife · Health and Food Safety · Public administration
Energy and Natural Resources · Environment, Climate and Wildlife · Public administration
Infrastructure and Transportation
Business, Trade and Industry
Business, Trade and Industry · Citizenship and Immigration · Environment, Climate and Wildlife · Health and Food Safety · Human Rights · Labour and Employment · Public administration
Health and Food Safety
Health and Food Safety
Health and Food Safety
Judgment
4
Reported
Decree 9 is pre-1994 law but not a provincial Act; High Court’s invalidity order took immediate effect.
* Constitutional law – confirmation jurisdiction – sections 167(5) and 172(2)(a) – when Constitutional Court must confirm High Court declaration of invalidity.* Status of pre-1994 (old-order/TBVC) legislation – indicators: origin, territorial application, and especially post-1994 legislative treatment/endorsement.* Environmental law – Decree 9 (Transkei) – criminalisation of possession of protected wild animal parts and strict liability provision challenged under fair trial/presumption of innocence and equality (section 9).* Incorporation by reference, partial repeal/amendment by Parliament, assignment of executive functions and executive action do not automatically amount to legislative endorsement.
Reported
A s2(2)(a) certificate is evidentiary, not the sole basis for protecting ownership of escaped game.
* Game Theft Act 105 of 1991 – s 2(1)(a) and s 2(2)(a) – interpretation of deeming provision – certificate by Premier as evidentiary facilitation, not conclusive prerequisite to protection against loss of ownership of escaped game.* Statutory interpretation – deeming provisions construed in context and with regard to legislative purpose; may be rebuttable by other proof.* Common law development – unnecessary to decide where statutory protection resolves ownership dispute.
Urgent ex parte relief was appropriate and costs awarded; first respondent penalised with attorney-and-client costs for evasive conduct.
* Civil procedure – urgent ex parte relief – rule nisi – availability where imminent harm to private property shown. * Public gatherings law – Safety at Sports and Recreational Events Act does not apply to gatherings regulated by the Regulation of Gatherings Act; no notice given under Regulation of Gatherings Act. * Costs – discretionary exercise; general costs follow the event; punitive (attorney-and-client) costs awarded for evasive conduct and failure to comply with court processes.
Reported
An agreement to stage profit-driven physical contests between members of the public is unlawful, unenforceable, and may attract criminal and regulatory scrutiny.
Contract and public policy – agreements to organise profit-driven physical contests between members of the public – consent and assault – distinction between lawful sport and unlawful violent contests – statutory regulation (Boxing Act; Safety at Sports and Recreational Events Act) – potential proceeds of unlawful activity/organised crime implications (POCA) – referrals to CIPC and NPA.
Act
1
Uncommenced
Agriculture and Land · Arts and Culture · Education · Finance and Money · Infrastructure and Transportation · Public administration
To the top