Related documents
- Is commenced by Community Schemes Ombud Service Act, 2011: Commencement
Loading PDF...
This document is 999.6 KB. Do you want to load it?
History of this document
07 October 2016
14 June 2011 this version
11 June 2011
Assented to
Cited documents 0
Documents citing this one 105
Judgment
75|
A member’s short-term letting rights under an MOI/Conduct Rules can be lawfully removed by a validly passed special resolution; adjudicator must consider MOI amendment legality.
Community schemes – CSOS Act s57 appeals limited to questions of law; adjudicator’s duty to consider relevant evidence (s50(c)). MOI amendments – requirements for special resolutions and valid voting; minutes and notice as determinative. Validity of AGM special resolution to amend MOI and Conduct Rules; board’s power to convene AGM under MOI. Vested rights – contractual rights under MOI/Conduct Rules can be altered by validly passed amendments.
|
|
Appeals from a division on a tax appeal require SCA special leave; this Court lacked jurisdiction to grant it.
Tax law; Appeals — Tax Administration Act s 133; Superior Courts Act s 16(1)(b) — special leave to SCA; jurisdiction of full court on appeals from tax court; tax courts as courts of revision vs courts of law; distinction from Lewis Stores statutory-appeal jurisprudence; costs on Scale B.
|
|
Leave to appeal refused; special voting rules in a mixed‑use sectional scheme not shown to be unlawful or reasonably appealable.
* Civil procedure – leave to appeal – section 17 Superior Courts Act – elevated threshold: reasonable prospect of success or compelling reasons required. * Sectional titles – mixed‑use schemes – special rules allocating voting rights – not per se unconstitutional or discriminatory; courts cautious about rewriting rules forming contractual arrangements among owners. * Administrative law – appeal from Ombud – factual disputes (knowledge of rules, unequal application, alleged conflicts) are not determinative on appeal on points of law.
|
|
CSOS may adjudicate building‑penalty disputes; penalties invalid where imposed without fair notice or opportunity to be heard.
Community Schemes Ombud Service Act — jurisdiction to adjudicate building/contractual penalties; distinction between ‘void’ and ‘invalid’ decisions (s41); section 39(1) financial issues includes penalties; procedural fairness before levying building penalties (notice and opportunity to remedy/represent); CSOS jurisdiction upheld by case law (Chapman's Bay; Stone River).
|
|
Reported
Court grants condonation and overturns retrospective balcony levy that conflicted with STSMA proviso and scheme rules.
* Community Schemes Ombud Service Act s 57 – right of appeal to High Court on question of law; implied power to grant condonation for late appeals. * Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act s 3(1)(c) proviso – where conduct rules make owners responsible for maintenance of exclusive‑use areas, body corporate may not levy contributions to defray those maintenance costs. * Exclusive‑use areas – interplay between conduct rules and permissible levies. * Remedy – setting aside adjudicator’s order and directing trustees to adjust levies retrospectively; court not to fix specific levy amount.
|
|
Reported
Court grants condonation, quashes adjudicator’s order for unlawful delegation, and remits dispute for reconsideration.
Community Schemes Ombud Service Act – s 57 appeals – High Court power to condone late lodgement; Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act – s 3(1)(d) – additional contributions by holders of rights of extension determined via budgetary/levy process; Administrative law – unlawful delegation – adjudicator may not delegate adjudicative decision‑making to a non‑adjudicator (auditor).
|
|
Adjudicator misapplied the law on a building-penalty resolution; appeal upheld and award set aside.
Community Schemes Ombud Service Act s57 — appeal limited to questions of law; Companies Act s65(6) — effect on challenging approved resolutions; CSOS Act s39(4)(c),(e) — power to declare resolutions void/invalid or interfering with owners' rights; Misapplication of law by adjudicator warrants setting aside award.
|
|
Adjudicator erred in deciding disputed director-election facts on paper; appeal upheld and application dismissed.
Community Schemes Ombud Service Act — s51 investigative powers — adjudicator must obtain affidavits/interviews where facts are disputed; AGM adjournment — interpretation of Memorandum clause 6.2 on deemed retirement of directors; appellate remedy where adjudicator resolves factual disputes without hearing.
|
|
Body Corporate entitled to monetary judgment and court‑authorised disconnection of unit electricity for outstanding electricity charges.
Sectional Titles — recovery of arrear levies and utility charges — tacit agreement binding unit owners to Body Corporate rules and resolutions — court authorisation to disconnect electricity for non‑payment — distinction from Joseph (procedural fairness) — Rule 42 correction of patent error.
|
|
A late section 57 appeal and unrelated delay defeat condonation; adjudicators lack power to grant broad constitutional accommodation orders under the Act.
Community schemes — s57 appeals — whether courts may condone non‑compliance with statutory 30‑day appeal period — interpretation of s57(2) and access to courts — scope of adjudicator’s powers under s39 — competence of declaratory and reasonable accommodation orders — costs and Biowatch principle.
|
Gazette
28By-law
2|
Environment, Climate and Wildlife
·
Health and Food Safety
|
|
Environment, Climate and Wildlife
·
Health and Food Safety
|