Grootboom v National Prosecuting Authority and Another [2013] ZACC 37 (21 October 2013)

Reported
Grootboom v National Prosecuting Authority and Another [2013] ZACC 37 (21 October 2013)

Loading PDF...

This document is 239.1 KB. Do you want to load it?

Error loading PDF
Try reloading the page or downloading the PDF.
Error:
▲ To the top

Cited documents 18

Act
6
Citizenship and Immigration · Education · Environment, Climate and Wildlife · Health and Food Safety · Human Rights · International Law · Labour and Employment · Public administration
Business, Trade and Industry · Dispute Resolution and Mediation · Environment, Climate and Wildlife · Finance and Money · Human Rights · International Law · Labour and Employment
Dispute Resolution and Mediation · Human Rights
Dispute Resolution and Mediation

Documents citing this one 57

Judgment
57
Reported
Reported
Reported
Reported
Reported

Constitutional and administrative law – procurement process – legality review – self-review by an organ of state – proper approach to establish whether irregularities occurred as a matter of fact – evaluation whether irregularities constitute tenable grounds of review – determination of whether there had been deviation from procurement prescripts and, if established, the materiality of such deviation from legal requirements of procurement process – determination of whether the manifest purpose sought to be served by the procurement process had been substantially accomplished.

Delay in instituting a legality review – whether delay unreasonable and if so, whether delay should nevertheless be condoned – legality self-review not subject to strictures of s 7(1) of Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000 – nevertheless legality self-review required to be instituted without unreasonable delay – whether delay is unreasonable is a question of fact – whether unreasonable delay should be condoned entails a value judgment dictated by constitutional value

 

Reported

Public school and school governing body – South African Schools Act 84 of 1996 as amended (the Schools Act) – interpretation of s 60(1) – liability of State for delictual or contractual damage or loss arising from act or omission in connection with school activity for which such a public school would have been liable but for the Schools Act.

Reported