Provincial Government North West and Another v Tsoga Developers CC and Others [2016] ZACC 9 (24 March 2016)

Reported
Provincial Government North West and Another v Tsoga Developers CC and Others [2016] ZACC 9 (24 March 2016)

Loading PDF...

This document is 227.2 KB. Do you want to load it?

Error loading PDF
Try reloading the page or downloading the PDF.
Error:
▲ To the top

Cited documents 20

Judgment
14
Reported
Reported
Reported

Administrative action – validity of administrative decision not the subject of counter-application or separate review application – beneficiary of decision prejudiced – proper process must be followed to set the decision aside – validity of decision not before the Court.

Administrative action – status of administrative decision improperly taken – decision remains effectual until properly set aside and cannot be ignored – application of Oudekraal judgment.

Reported
Reported
Reported
Reported
Reported
Reported
Reported
Act
6
Citizenship and Immigration · Education · Environment, Climate and Wildlife · Health and Food Safety · Human Rights · International Law · Labour and Employment · Public administration
Finance and Money
Dispute Resolution and Mediation · Human Rights
Repealed
Business, Trade and Industry · Finance and Money · Labour and Employment · Public administration
Dispute Resolution and Mediation

Documents citing this one 8

Judgment
8
Reported
Reported
Reported

Suspension of operation of order pending an appeal – section 18(1) of Superior Courts Act 10 of 2013 – leave to execute on order in terms of s 18(3) of Act – requirements – urgent appeal in terms of s 18(4) of Act – suspension of order granting leave to execute in terms of s 18(4)(iv) of Act – whether court empowered to order that suspension would not operate – such an order a nullity.

Reported

Constitutional and administrative law – just and equitable order under s 172(1)(b) of the Constitution – factors to be taken into account – default judgment valid and binding – s 165(5) of the Constitution – enforceability of court orders – order sought having effect of prohibiting execution of the default judgment – order not just and equitable – application for leave to appeal dismissed.

Civil Procedure – on appeal, the appellants were not entitled to an order they did not seek in the court of first instance – attachment of a bank account held by an organ of State – order of this Court on appeal would be of no practical effect – issues raised were moot – costs order of the court a quo reversed on account of serious injustice suffered by the first respondent