This document is 107.8 KB. Do you want to load it?
Cited documents 11
Judgment
6
Reported
|
Reported
|
Reported
|
Reported
|
Act
4
Citizenship and Immigration
·
Education
·
Environment, Climate and Wildlife
·
Health and Food Safety
·
Human Rights
·
International Law
·
Labour and Employment
·
Public administration
|
Dispute Resolution and Mediation
·
Human Rights
|
Dispute Resolution and Mediation
|
Business, Trade and Industry
|
Government Notice
1Documents citing this one 9
Judgment
9
Reported
|
Reported
|
Pharmacy Act 53 of 1974 (the Act) – regulation 6(d) of the Regulations relating to Ownership and Licencing of Pharmacies – beneficial interest in community pharmacies and manufacturing companies – revocation of retail and manufacturing licences – definition of ‘beneficial interest’ – constitutional challenge of s 22A of the Act – whether Clicks Group had contravened the Act and licensing regulations because entities within the Clicks Group owned community (retail) pharmacies while at the same time having a beneficial interest in a manufacturing company – Clicks Group has no beneficial interest in the pharmaceutical manufacturing companies – constitutional challenge has no merit. |
Constitutional Law – Promotion of Access to Information Act 2 of 2003 – access to report on forensic investigation – fraud and accounting irregularities in public company – ensuing criminal prosecutions – report not subject to legal professional privilege – in any event privileged waived by publication of summary – disclosure of report in the public interest |
Insolvency law — order of final sequestration not preceded by provisional order — order not a nullity — valid until set aside by a court of law — no proper case for rescission
|
Lease – remission and abatement of rent – vis major – subtenant suffering loss of use and enjoyment of leased premises – whether tenant entitled to claim remission – piercing of corporate veil – application of common law principles – whether common law to be developed – appeal dismissed. |
Rescission in terms of rule 42(1)(a) of the Uniform Rules of Court of default judgment granted under s 20(9) of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 – no proper case made out.
|