Skip to document content Skip to main menu Skip to search

Harvey NO and Others v Crawford NO and Others (1016 of 2017) [2018] ZASCA 147 (17 October 2018)

Harvey NO and Others v Crawford NO and Others (1016 of 2017) [2018] ZASCA 147 (17 October 2018)
Citation
Harvey NO and Others v Crawford NO and Others (1016 of 2017) [2018] ZASCA 147 (17 October 2018)
Media Neutral Citation
[2018] ZASCA 147
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa
Case number
1016 of 2017
Judges
Dambuza JA, Zondi JA, Molemela JA, Tshiqi JA, Ponnan JA
Judgment date
17 October 2018
Language
English
Type
Judgment
Skip to document content
Loading PDF...

This document is 385.0 KB. Do you want to load it?

Error loading PDF
Try reloading the page or downloading the PDF.
Reload page Download PDF
Error:
▲ To the top

Cited documents 16

Judgment
9
Act
7
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996
Citizenship and Immigration · Education · Environment, Climate and Wildlife · Health and Food Safety · Human Rights · International Law · Labour and Employment · Public administration
Children's Act, 2005
Human Rights
Trust Property Control Act, 1988
Finance and Money
Wills Act, 1953
Finance and Money
Intestate Succession Act, 1987
Finance and Money
Shipping Laws Amendment Act, 1998
Law of Succession Amendment Act, 1992

Documents citing this one 4

Judgment
4
Wilkinson and Another v Crawford NO and Others [2021] ZACC 8 (16 April 2021)
Reported
King NO and Others v De Jager and Others [2021] ZACC 4 (19 February 2021)
Reported
Dhlomo N.O. and Others v Chalwa N.O. and Another (8721/23P) [2023] ZAKZPHC 134 (10 November 2023)
Phillipa Susan van Zyl NO v Getz (548/2019) [2020] ZASCA 84 (6 July 2020)

Uniform Rules of Court – rule 33(4) – stated case to determine
whether estate of deceased grandparent has duty to support grandchild – both parents alive – father’s whereabouts and financial means unknown – no facts showing mother’s support inadequate – not a proper case to decide legal issue separately under rule 33(4) – inappropriate to determine whether common law should be developed in terms of secs 39(2) and 173 of the Constitution to provide for said duty – order by court below two years after hearing without reasons –
improper – duty of Judge to deliver judgment expeditiously.