Bilankulu and Another v S (188/2020) [2020] ZASCA 114 (29 September 2020)

Bilankulu and Another v S (188/2020) [2020] ZASCA 114 (29 September 2020)

Loading PDF...

This document is 252.5 KB. Do you want to load it?

Error loading PDF
Try reloading the page or downloading the PDF.
Error:
▲ To the top

Documents citing this one 2

Judgment
2

Application for condonation of the late filing of notice of appeal – requirements for condonation restated – appellant not satisfying requirements – application refused and appeal struck from the roll

Criminal Procedure – Entrapment –import of s 252A of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 (‘CPA’) considered.
Evidence – Exclusionary rule in terms of s 252A of CPA and s 35(5) of the Constitution considered – no basis on the facts of the current case to exclude evidence obtained by entrapment by undercover agent

Application by appellant, in appeal against refusal of High Court to grant petition for leave to appeal in terms of s 309C of CPA against conviction in the magistrates’ court, to adduce further evidence for the purpose of the contemplated appeal to the High Court on the merits –appellant purporting to rely on s 19 of Superior Courts Act 10 of 2013 – s 19 not applicable in respect of appeals regulated by the CPA and any other criminal procedural law – application in any event not satisfying the established test for the introduction of further evidence on appeal

 

252A Ruling - Trap - Concept beyond an opportunity to commit an offence