Airports Company South Africa SOC Ltd v Imperial Group Ltd and Others (1306/2018) [2020] ZASCA 2 (31 January 2020)

Airports Company South Africa SOC Ltd v Imperial Group Ltd and Others (1306/2018) [2020] ZASCA 2 (31 January 2020)

Loading PDF...

This document is 571.4 KB. Do you want to load it?

Error loading PDF
Try reloading the page or downloading the PDF.
Error:
▲ To the top

Cited documents 26

Judgment
18
Reported
Reported

Section 8(1)(c)(ii)(aa) of the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000 — test for exceptional circumstances.

Court in as good a place as the administrator — decision of the administrator is a foregone conclusion — considerations of fairness weigh in favour of substitution order — exceptional circumstances warrant substitution order.

Standard of appellate court interference — discretion in the true sense.

Reported
Reported
Reported
Reported
Reported
Reported
Reported
Reported
Administrative Law — Administrative Action · Commercial — Constitutional Law · Refugees
Act
7
Citizenship and Immigration · Education · Environment, Climate and Wildlife · Health and Food Safety · Human Rights · International Law · Labour and Employment · Public administration
Finance and Money
Dispute Resolution and Mediation · Human Rights
Business, Trade and Industry · Finance and Money · Labour and Employment · Public administration
Business, Trade and Industry · Finance and Money · Infrastructure and Transportation

Documents citing this one 10

Judgment
10
Reported
Reported

Exercise of power by Minister under s 5 of the Preferential
Procurement Policy Framework Act 5 of 2000 to make Preferential Procurement Regulations 2017 – Minister exceeding powers - Regulations declared invalid and set aside – order of declaration of invalidity suspended for 12 months.

Reported

 Land – land reform – Extension of Security of Tenure Act 62 of 1997 (ESTA) – whether eviction order just and equitable – fundamental breach of relationship between occupier and owner under s 10(1)(c) – occupier unlawfully removing building materials and erecting illegal structure on land – fundamental breach of relationship justifying eviction – opportunity for representations under s 8(1)(e) of ESTA – not required in the circumstances – appeal upheld.

Procurement – Section 217(1) of the Constitution – whether a tripartite agreement between two organs of state and a private entity was one that contemplated contracting for goods or services – the agreement, in furtherance of the objects of the organs of state, required the private entity to provide smallholder farmers with cattle, paid for with public funds, veterinary kits and feed supplements, and to provide training and mentorship – the agreement was for the provision of goods and services as contemplated by s 217(1) – no procurement process complying with s 217(1) preceded the agreement – the agreement was declared to be invalid.