- Flynote
-
Validity – Regulation 44 under the National Credit Act 34 of
2005 – invocation of defensive challenge to deregistration proceedings –
period allowed for comment on proposed regulation inadequate –
promulgation of regulation non-compliant with National Credit Act –
appellant not entitled to rely on regulation in proceedings brought to deregister
first respondent.
Loading PDF...
This document is 195.6 KB. Do you want to load it?
Cited documents 8
Judgment 6
- Fedsure Life Assurance Ltd and Others v Greater Johannesburg Transitional Metropolitan Council and Others [1998] ZACC 17 (14 October 1998)
- Merafong City Local Municipality v AngloGold Ashanti Limited [2016] ZACC 35 (24 October 2016)
- Minister of Home Affairs and Others v Scalabrini Centre, Cape Town and Others (360/13; 735/12) [2013] ZASCA 134 (27 September 2013)
- Natal Joint Municipal Pension Fund v Endumeni Municipality (920/2010) [2012] ZASCA 13 (16 March 2012)
- Premier, Western Cape v President of the Republic of South Africa and Another [1999] ZACC 2 (29 March 1999)
- President of the Republic of South Africa and Others v South African Rugby Football Union and Others - Judgment on recusal application [1999] ZACC 9 (4 June 1999)