- Flynote
-
Contempt of court proceedings – failure to comply with court
order – application for declarator to that effect – standard of proof required –
applicant for declarator required to prove non-compliance on a balance of
probabilities – once existence of court order, service thereof and non-
compliance established, respondent bears evidentiary onus to show that non-
compliance neither wilful nor mala fide – respondents failing to discharge
evidentiary onus
Loading PDF...
This document is 490.1 KB. Do you want to load it?
Cited documents 10
Judgment 9
- Department of Transport and Others v Tasima (Pty) Ltd [2016] ZACC 39 (9 November 2016)
- Fakie NO v CCII Systems (Pty) Ltd (653/2004) [2006] ZASCA 52 (31 March 2006)
- Manana v King Sabata Dalindyebo Municipality (345/2009) [2010] ZASCA 144 (25 November 2010)
- Master of the High Court Northern Gauteng High Court, Pretoria v Motala NO and Others (172/2011) [2011] ZASCA 238 (1 December 2011)
- Merafong City Local Municipality v AngloGold Ashanti Limited [2016] ZACC 35 (24 October 2016)
- Minister of Rural Development and Land Reform v Normandien Farms (Pty) Ltd and Others, Mathibane and Others v Normandien Farms (Pty) Ltd and Others (370 of 2017) [2017] ZASCA 163 (29 November 2017)
- Moodley v Kenmont School and Others (Centre for Child Law as Amicus Curiae) [2019] ZACC 37 (9 October 2019)
- Whitehead and Another v Trustees, Insolvent Estate Riekert and Others (567/2020) [2020] ZASCA 124 (7 October 2020)
- Wightman t/a J W Construction v Headfour (Pty) Ltd and Another (66/2007) [2008] ZASCA 6 (10 March 2008)