background image
profile image

Constitutional Court of South Africa

The Constitutional Court of South Africa is a supreme constitutional court established by the Constitution of South Africa, and is the apex court in the South African judicial system, with general jurisdiction. The Court was first established by the Interim Constitution of 1993, and its first session began in February 1995. It has continued in existence under the Constitution of 1996. The Court sits in the city of Johannesburg. The Constitutional Court has jurisdiction to hear any matter if it is in the interests of justice for it to do so. (Banner image credit: By André-Pierre from Stellenbosch, South Africa.)
Physical address
Constitutional Court, 1 Hospital Street, Constitution Hill, Braamfontein, South Africa, 2017
40 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Labels
  • Case actions
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
40 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
December 2015
Reported
Excessive delay in prosecuting a review justified dismissal of review and refusal of leave to appeal.
Labour law — review of CCMA arbitration award — dismissal of review for excessive delay — obligations to reconstruct incomplete CCMA record (rule 7A) — arbitrator’s duties to decide core issues — competence of reinstatement/back‑pay where resignation would have taken effect — remedial consequences and costs.
15 December 2015
Reported
Whether to remit or decide on the merits when the arbitration record is missing and whether dismissal was unfair.
Labour law — review of arbitration award — missing mechanical record of arbitration — duty to reconstruct record — remedy when no record exists — remittal v decision on merits; fairness of dismissal — procedural fairness (excluded witnesses) and substantive fairness (sanction mitigation); reinstatement as remedy.
10 December 2015
Reported
Section 78 execution orders are appealable if final in effect; eviction execution pending appeal was set aside.
Civil procedure – Magistrates’ Court Act s78 execution orders – appealability where order has the effect of a final judgment (s83(b)). Interlocutory relief – ‘final in effect’ test for appealability. Eviction law – irreparable harm from loss of home; just and equitable balancing under PIE. Appellate review – interference where discretion misdirected, wrong principles applied or facts misunderstood. Municipal housing obligations and administrative allocation failures.
2 December 2015
November 2015
Reported
Applicants succeeded: IEC failures in registrations and roll provision rendered municipal by‑elections not free and fair.
Electoral law — IEC obligations — voter registration — register only in voting district where voter is ordinarily resident; sufficient particularity of address required. Electoral law — voters’ roll — section 16(3) requires provision of roll segments including addresses (where available) to candidates on certification. Constitutional law — right to free and fair elections (s 19) — material administrative failures (incorrect registrations, late roll provision, omission of addresses) can render by‑elections not free and fair. Procedural law — Electoral Court jurisdiction under s 20(1)(a) of Commission Act to review any IEC decision relating to electoral matters. Remedies — set aside of tainted by‑elections and fresh by‑elections ordered; prospective declaratory relief to clarify IEC obligations.
30 November 2015
Reported
A transport utility’s breach of public safety duties (open train doors) can attract delictual liability for passenger injuries.
Delict; transposition of public-law breaches into private-law delict; organ of state duty to protect rail passengers; wrongfulness of omissions; reasonable organ of state standard; role of resource constraints; negligence for open train doors; factual (but-for) and legal causation; availability of non-judicial remedies; liability for damages.
26 November 2015
Reported
Leave to appeal refused; arbitration upheld and equality claim must ordinarily first be pursued in the Equality Court.
Arbitration Act s 3(2) — setting aside arbitration agreement — high threshold of ‘good cause’. Religious associations — internal discipline and arbitration as appropriate forum for church governance disputes. Equality law — unfair discrimination on ground of sexual orientation and principle of constitutional subsidiarity (Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act — Equality Court jurisdiction). Civil procedure — rule 16A notice when raising constitutional issues; admission of amicus curiae; procedural compliance relevant to leave to appeal.
24 November 2015
Reported
A sub-lessee cannot oppose commercial eviction by contesting the lessor’s title; no development of the common law warranted.
Common law – Lease and eviction – Rule that lessee/sub-lessee cannot dispute lessor’s title to resist ejectment after lease termination; Boompret; development of common law under s39(2) – when required; statutory retail licences do not confer possessory rights displacing common law on these facts; enrichment lien pleaded late – not entertained on appeal; Rule 33 practice note and appellate role – court of first and last instance limits.
19 November 2015
October 2015
Reported
Delayed transfer and treatment of a rugby-related cervical injury constituted wrongful, negligent refusal of emergency medical treatment, causally linked to paralysis.
Delict — medical negligence and wrongfulness — delayed treatment of low-velocity cervical spinal injury — evaluation of competing expert evidence (Linksfield) — factual causation where prompt closed reduction within four hours would probably prevent permanent paralysis — section 27(3) emergency medical treatment — institutional protocol versus emergency exception; costs.
14 October 2015
Reported
A broad interdict restraining the applicant’s speech about the fund was unjustified and set aside.
Freedom of expression — defamation — test is whether publication is likely to injure the plaintiff’s reputation in the estimation of reasonable readers; omission of later successful appeal not necessarily defamatory — allegations of maladministration and repayment of funds may be true or protected comment — prior restraint and overbroad interdict unjustified.
1 October 2015
September 2015
Reported
Whether PAIA gives effect to s32(2) and whether Parliament failed to legislate disclosure of private political funding.
Constitutional law – access to information (s 32) – national legislation (PAIA) enacted to give effect to right – constitutional subsidiarity – proper route for challenging adequacy of statute (section 172) – exclusive jurisdiction (s 167(4)(e)) – political party funding disclosure – separation of powers.
30 September 2015
Reported
A consent settlement made an order of court is binding and enforceable; re‑enrolment under that order was not barred by rule 32 and did not breach access to court.
Settlement agreements — made an order of court — vest terms with status of court order and give finality / res judicata; enforcement may be by execution, contempt or other suitable processes. Procedure — courts may use inherent powers (s173) to regulate process; substance over form where settlement order prescribes enforcement steps; re‑enrolment under a consent order is not a prohibited second summary judgment under rule 32. Constitutional law — clause undertaking not to oppose an application does not automatically violate s34 where the party had opportunity to ventilate defences. Court orders — must be clear, unambiguous and readily enforceable; courts should guard against granting orders that are incapable of enforcement.
29 September 2015
Reported
Statutory rights to enter land for communications infrastructure do not require prior consent but must comply with applicable law and servitude safeguards.
Electronic communications — Statutory rights to enter land and construct networks under ECA ss 22–24 — Meaning of “due regard to applicable law” — Common law servitudes (civiliter modo) and municipal by‑laws applicable — Deprivation under Constitution s 25(1) — Not arbitrary where exercise is subject to notice, consultation, supervision and compensation — PAJA applicability left open.
23 September 2015
Reported
Appeal dismissed as moot; section 34 may, in exceptional contexts, engage commissions but does not automatically obligate Legal Aid to fund representation.
Constitutional law – Mootness and interests of justice – Section 34 (access to courts/tribunals) – Application to commissions of inquiry – Context‑specific test for applicability – State‑funded legal representation is not automatically required; funding governed by statutory/administrative framework – Administrative law – review and limits on funding discretion.
22 September 2015
August 2015
Reported
Court extends suspension of invalidity for 12 months as just and equitable to avoid public prejudice.
Constitutional law – extension of suspension of order of invalidity – determined by what is just and equitable; factors include adequacy of prior suspension period, applicant’s diligence in pursuing legislative cure, and consequences to public/government/Parliament; legislative process and parliamentary amendment scope may justify extension.
28 August 2015
Reported
Whether the State is a single employer under the Compensation Act or provincial employers remain individually liable.
Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act — meaning of “employer” — secondment — State as single employer vs individually liable spheres — section 35(1) limitation of actions — role of sections 39(2), 84(1) and 88(1) — constitutional interpretation (section 39(2)) promoting Bill of Rights and protecting right to bodily integrity.
25 August 2015
Reported
Section 5(4) limits only occupation/use rights to 12 months; provisional associations remain juristic and retain standing to sue.
Communal Property Associations Act – s5(4) – provisional association acquires juristic status and limited right to occupy/use land for 12 months; does not cease to exist on expiry – extension conditional on s5(5). Statutory interpretation – purposive, Constitutionally informed construction. Director-General’s duties – obligation to assist communities to achieve permanent registration. Legal standing – association that qualifies for registration has standing to sue.
20 August 2015
Reported
A presiding councillor may not use a casting vote to decide matters listed in section 160(2) of the Constitution.
Local government — Municipal Structures Act s30(4) — casting vote — incompatibility with Constitution s160(3)(b) — approval of budgets and other s160(2) matters — reading-in as remedy — prospective effect and saving past decisions.
18 August 2015
June 2015
Reported
A grocer’s wine licence can be property, but the provincial law changing licensing was not an arbitrary deprivation.
Property — constitutional protection of commercial/state-issued licences; section 25 — whether statutory licence to sell wine in grocery stores is "property"; Deprivation — whether transitional legislative scheme deprived licence-holders; Arbitrariness — standard for legislative deprivation (sliding scale from rationality to proportionality); Regulatory change and legislative facts — provincial liquor regulation and transitional arrangements; Remedy — confirmation of invalidity withheld.
30 June 2015
Reported
Mandatory institutionalisation or imprisonment under s77(6)(a) is unconstitutional absent judicial discretion and proper safeguards.
• Criminal Procedure Act s77(6)(a) – capacity to understand proceedings – peremptory effect and removal of judicial discretion. • Detention and institutionalisation – section 12 (freedom and security) – substantive and procedural protection against arbitrary deprivation of liberty. • Children’s rights – s28: detention as last resort and best interests – mandatory institutionalisation/imprisonment unconstitutional for children. • Mental health law interaction – compatibility with Mental Health Care Act safeguards and judge‑in‑chambers review. • Remedy – reading‑in and suspension of declaration for legislative amendment.
26 June 2015
Reported
Court may substitute administrative award only in exceptional circumstances where it is in as good a position and outcome is foregone conclusion.
Administrative law – PAJA s 8(1)(c)(ii)(aa) – substitution of administrative action – test for exceptional circumstances: (i) court in as good a position as administrator and (ii) foregone conclusion, considered cumulatively – other factors (delay, bias, incompetence, fairness) relevant – substitution extraordinary remedy – tender validity period not absolute bar – appellate interference limited where lower court exercised discretion in true sense.
26 June 2015
Reported
Admitting extra‑curial admissions against co‑accused is unconstitutional; common‑law prohibition restored and convictions set aside.
Evidence – hearsay; extra‑curial statements of accused; admissibility against co‑accused. Criminal Procedure – distinction between confessions and admissions; section 219A CPA. Evidence Amendment Act 45 of 1988 – section 3, section 3(2): hearsay exceptions do not validate evidence otherwise inadmissible. Constitutional law – equality (section 9(1)) and fair trial (section 35): differentiation between admissions and confessions irrational and unconstitutional. Common law – restoration of rule excluding extra‑curial statements against co‑accused; common‑purpose/conspiracy executive‑statement exception not decided.
25 June 2015
Reported
A superior court may relax res judicata in exceptional circumstances to revisit final criminal convictions to prevent grave injustice.
Criminal procedure – res judicata – finality of criminal convictions – courts may, in rare and exceptional circumstances, relax res judicata under section 173 and develop common law under section 39(2) to avoid grave injustice. Evidence – extra‑curial statements of an accused against a co‑accused – admissibility and requirement for independent corroboration; convictions based predominantly on such statements may be unsafe. Constitutional remedy – equality and fair trial considerations where unrepresented applicants failed to raise meritorious constitutional issues earlier.
25 June 2015
Reported
The applicant’s delictual claim for adultery is not wrongful and therefore unsustainable under constitutional public policy.
Delict — actio iniuriarum — adultery — contumelia and loss of consortium — wrongfulness assessed against public policy now informed by constitutional values (dignity, privacy, freedom of association, bodily integrity) — development of common law under section 39(2) — comparative and international trends towards abolition.
19 June 2015
Reported
Exit charge on capital export is a regulatory measure, not a tax requiring money-Bill procedure.
Constitutional law — money Bills — distinction between taxes and regulatory charges — dominant-purpose test; Exchange control — exit charge under reg 10(1)(c) is regulatory, not a tax; Interpretation of Currency and Exchanges Act s9(4) — "calculated to raise revenue" means intended/designed, not merely likely; Delegation — broad executive discretion in exchange-control context permissible given need for speed, expertise; Standing and public-interest cross-appeal — speculative challenges refused.
18 June 2015
Reported
Extension of suspension granted due to public-consultation delay; respondents awarded costs.
Constitutional remedies – suspension of declaration of invalidity – extension of suspension period; Factors for extension: sufficiency of explanation, prejudice, prospects of correction, orderly state administration; Separation of powers – deference to Parliament and value of holistic legislative revision; Urgency and procedural conduct; Costs awarded to respondents.
15 June 2015
Reported
Mandatory refund provision in s89(5)(b) unlawfully deprived credit providers of property by denying judicial discretion.
Constitutional law — Property (s 25) — Monies paid under credit agreements constitute property — Deprivation by mandatory refund under s 89(5)(b) — Procedural arbitrariness where statute denies judicial discretion — Unjustified enrichment does not cure arbitrariness — Limitation not justified under s 36 — Remedy: require courts to make just and equitable orders (Amendment Act mirrors cure).
5 June 2015
Reported
Alienation of Land Act’s exclusion of vulnerable purchasers who paid in full within one year violates equality and housing rights.
Alienation of Land Act 68 of 1981 – Chapter II (sections 21–22) – under‑inclusivity – whether protections for instalment purchasers must extend to vulnerable purchasers who paid in full within one year – constitutional rights engaged: s 26 (access to adequate housing), s 9 (equality) – negative obligation not to impair existing access to housing – remedy: reading‑in and severance to add “vulnerable purchaser” and amend section 4 – relief prospective to unfinalised insolvent estates; court may not raise prescription mero motu.
4 June 2015
May 2015
Reported
Section 197(2) transfers employment-related pension/redundancy obligations to the transferee; appellants sued the wrong party.
Labour law — transfer of business as a going concern — section 197(2) LRA — effect on contracts, rights and obligations; pension/redundancy obligations taken over by transferee unless subsection (6) agreement or pension transfer applies — contracts of employment not terminated by transfer; procedural fairness — right to be heard (s 34) — no ambush by SCA; scope and interpretation of pension fund rule 7.1A(1).
14 May 2015
Reported
A suspended declaration of constitutional invalidity is retrospectively effective when suspension lapses unless court expressly limits it.
Constitutional law – declaration of invalidity – doctrine of objective constitutional invalidity – default retrospective effect; section 172(1)(b)(i) remedial power to limit retrospectivity; suspended declarations – interpretation of orders and judgments; functus officio and limits on varying final orders after suspension expiry; separation of powers and revival of invalid legislation; inherent powers (s173) and narrow scope for post-expiry variation.
12 May 2015
Reported
Leave to appeal dismissed: applicant failed to establish unfair discrimination or a reasonable apprehension of judicial bias.
Employment Equity Act s6 and s11 — unfair discrimination allegations on listed and arbitrary grounds — burden shifting: employer to justify in s11(1), complainant to prove irrationality in s11(2); employer’s business/operational needs as justification; judicial bias — actual bias and reasonable apprehension tests; disclosure of past associations; costs discretion of Labour Court and appellate courts.
7 May 2015
Reported
Failure to prove service barred a contempt finding; municipal officials and provincial actors joined and attorney penalised.
Contempt of court — civil contempt and committal — requisites: existence of order, service/notice, non‑compliance, wilfulness/mala fides — Fakie standard and safeguards — courts may initiate contempt proceedings mero motu — state organs’ duty to comply with constitutional orders — joinder of municipal and provincial office‑bearers for implementation — costs de bonis propriis for grossly negligent attorney.
7 May 2015
April 2015
Reported
Section 197 of the LRA applies to municipal entities and was triggered, causing automatic transfer of employees.
Labour law – section 197 LRA – transfer of business as a going concern – automatic transfer of employment contracts. Municipal law – applicability of Municipal Systems Act to municipal entities – relationship with labour legislation. Constitutional law – compatibility of s197 with sections 152 and 160 of the Constitution; organs of state performing public functions remain subject to labour obligations. Test for transfer – NEHAWU factors: substance over form; transfer of tangible/intangible assets; continuity of business and customer base; role of employees and know‑how.
20 April 2015
Reported
Foster and child support grants are not deductible from RAF loss‑of‑support awards; Timis on deduction was incorrect.
Children — social assistance — deductibility of foster child and child support grants from Road Accident Fund loss‑of‑support awards; grants stem from State’s duties under sections 27 and 28; grants payable to foster parents not the child; no double compensation; Timis reconsidered and limited.
20 April 2015
March 2015
Reported
Court retained supervisory jurisdiction, limited objections to five issues, imposed an expedited RFP timetable and restricted further relief to this Court.
Constitutional Court supervisory jurisdiction – tender remedy – Request for Proposals – limited remaining objections by incumbent service provider (beneficiaries; biometrics; free withdrawals; functional evaluation criteria; home deliveries) – expedited timetable for amendment, circulation, bidding and award – further relief to be sought in this Court with beneficiaries’ interests central.
24 March 2015
Reported
Leave to appeal refused: temporary, individual suspension of ‘undesirability’ findings did not satisfy OUTA appeal requirements.
Constitutional law — Review of urgent interim relief — Temporary suspension of individual declarations of ‘undesirability’ — Scope of judicial relief vis-à-vis executive authority — Application of OUTA criteria for appeals against interim orders.
24 March 2015
Reported
Excluded credit agreements are not void for non-registration; the in duplum interest cap applies during litigation.
National Credit Act – registration of credit providers – scope of s 4 exclusions – whether excluded agreements must be counted for s 40 registration thresholds – failure to register and invalidity under ss 40(4) and 89(2)(d). Common law – in duplum rule – arrear interest capped at capital – whether cap suspended pendente lite – Oneanate reconsidered and overruled. Post-judgment interest – runs from date of judgment at contractual rate on whole judgment debt. Suretyship – liability relative to principal debtor (not decided as unnecessary).
24 March 2015
February 2015
Reported
Successful private challengers to state conduct are ordinarily entitled to costs; departures must be carefully justified.
Constitutional litigation — costs — application of Biowatch principle — successful private litigant vs State ordinarily entitled to costs — courts must give carefully articulated and convincing reasons to depart — adverse costs chill access to constitutional remedies — exceptional circumstances may justify direct appellate intervention on costs alone.
26 February 2015
Reported
A default Labour Court judgment was rescinded for lack of jurisdiction and reliance on unserved, contradictory affidavits.
Labour law – rescission – s 165(a) LRA – default judgment erroneously granted – jurisdictional prerequisite under s 191(5) (90‑day rule) and need for condonation – service of affidavits and change of pleaded case – duty to require oral evidence where material contradictions affect relief – procedural fairness in default proceedings.
17 February 2015
January 2015
Reported
Court set aside President’s proclamation criminalising health services before essential regulations existed as irrational.
Constitutional law — Direct access to Constitutional Court — Review of exercise of public power — President’s power to bring legislation into force — Standard of review: rationality — Premature commencement of National Health Act provisions criminalising health services absent enabling regulations — Proclamation declared invalid.
27 January 2015
Reported
Whether section 89(2)(c) prohibits opinion or only false factual electoral statements; SMS held to be comment, not covered.
Electoral law – publication of false information to influence elections – distinction between factual statements and comment/opinion – section 89(2)(c) and item 9(1)(b) construed narrowly; penal electoral provisions interpreted restrictively; appeals from Electoral Court to higher courts competent.
19 January 2015