background image
profile image

Constitutional Court of South Africa

The Constitutional Court of South Africa is a supreme constitutional court established by the Constitution of South Africa, and is the apex court in the South African judicial system, with general jurisdiction. The Court was first established by the Interim Constitution of 1993, and its first session began in February 1995. It has continued in existence under the Constitution of 1996. The Court sits in the city of Johannesburg. The Constitutional Court has jurisdiction to hear any matter if it is in the interests of justice for it to do so. (Banner image credit: By André-Pierre from Stellenbosch, South Africa.)
Physical address
Constitutional Court, 1 Hospital Street, Constitution Hill, Braamfontein, South Africa, 2017
55 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Labels
  • Case actions
  • Topics
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
55 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
December 2016
Reported
21 December 2016
Reported
21 December 2016
Reported
21 December 2016
Reported
21 December 2016
Reported
21 December 2016
Reported
15 December 2016
Reported
15 December 2016
Reported
14 December 2016
Reported
14 December 2016
Reported
8 December 2016
Reported
1 December 2016
November 2016
Reported
30 November 2016
Reported
29 November 2016
Reported
25 November 2016
Reported
15 November 2016
Reported
10 November 2016
Reported
9 November 2016
Reported
8 November 2016
Reported
1 November 2016
October 2016
Reported
25 October 2016
Reported
24 October 2016
Reported
21 October 2016
September 2016
Reported
15 September 2016
Reported
13 September 2016
Reported
8 September 2016
Reported
6 September 2016
Reported
1 September 2016
Reported
1 September 2016
August 2016
Reported
30 August 2016
Reported
25 August 2016
Reported
24 August 2016
Reported
11 August 2016
Reported
4 August 2016
July 2016
Reported
28 July 2016
Reported
27 July 2016
Reported
26 July 2016
Reported
21 July 2016
Reported
15 July 2016
Reported
14 July 2016
June 2016
Reported
23 June 2016
Reported
14 June 2016
May 2016
Reported
20 May 2016
April 2016
Reported

Contract — breach — oral agreement to negotiate in good faith

Pleadings — Ostensible authority — Distinct from estoppel — Not necessary to plead ostensible authority in replication

Prescription Act 68 of 1969 — Sections 10(1), 11(d), 129(d) — interpretation of “debt”

Constitution — Section 39(2) — Narrow interpretation of “debt” —claim not prescribed

26 April 2016
Reported
21 April 2016
March 2016
Reported
31 March 2016
Reported
30 March 2016
Reported
24 March 2016
Reported
18 March 2016
Reported
8 March 2016
Reported
1 March 2016