|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| December 2020 |
|
|
Reported
An acting principal’s unjustified exclusion of a learner from a matric exam violated the right to basic education; urgent relief granted.
Constitutional law – Education – Section 29(1)(a) – Basic education includes Grade 12 and matric examinations – School principals as organs of state owe positive and negative obligations to protect learners’ right to basic education; unjustified exclusion from a scheduled matric exam violates s29(1)(a).; Direct access – Urgency – Exceptional circumstances, no disputed facts, and potential irreparable prejudice justify urgent direct access to the Constitutional Court.; Remedy – Declaratory relief, immediate opportunity to write missed exam with results released with contemporaries, costs against state respondents.
|
28 December 2020 |
|
Reported
Minister’s power to amend drug schedules unlawfully delegated Parliament’s legislative power; extradition provision denied judicial oversight.
Constitutional law – Separation of powers – impermissible delegation of plenary legislative power to Minister (Drugs Act s63) – ministerial amendments to Schedules invalid; Extradition law – Magistrate’s warrant power (Extradition Act s5(1)(a)) – insufficient judicial safeguards, arbitrary deprivation of liberty and breach of separation of powers – section declared unconstitutional; double criminality and Prince considered.
|
18 December 2020 |
|
Reported
Whether the Public Protector's subpoena power displaces Tax Administration Act secrecy; court refused direct appeal and set aside personal costs order.
Chapter 9 institutions — Public Protector — subpoena powers under Public Protector Act — interaction with Tax Administration Act s69(1) secrecy of taxpayer information — availability of taxpayer consent and High Court order under s69(2)(c) — direct leave to Constitutional Court requires exceptional circumstances — personal costs (de bonis propriis) against public officials are punitive and exceptional, requiring proof of reprehensible, egregious or grossly unprofessional conduct.
|
15 December 2020 |
|
Reported
Whether the High Court may hear contractual and constitutional employment claims or they fall exclusively to the Labour Court.
Labour law — jurisdiction — interpretation of LRA s157(1) and s157(2); concurrent jurisdiction with High Court for contractual and constitutional employment claims; enforcement of contractual and public-law remedies; Public Protector obligations (s181(2)).
|
4 December 2020 |
|
Reported
Section 7(2) requires adequately independent prison oversight; budgetary control by the department undermines that independence.
Constitutional law — State obligations under s7(2) to protect inmates’ rights — oversight bodies must have adequate independence; correctional-services oversight — financial, operational and perceived independence required; statutory provisions placing an inspectorate’s budget under the department being overseen can undermine independence; s39(1)(b) and Optional Protocol (OPCAT) informative in interpreting rights; remedial suspension to permit legislative correction.
|
4 December 2020 |
| November 2020 |
|
|
Reported
Criminalising incitement to “any offence” is overbroad; court reads in “serious” and suspends invalidity for Parliament to act.
Constitutional law — Freedom of expression — Incitement — Whether criminalising incitement to "any offence" is an overbroad limitation of s 16(1) — Section 36(1) proportionality and less restrictive means — Reading‑in and suspended declaration as remedial measures. Property law — Interaction of Trespass Act and PIE — no general prohibition on prosecuting unlawful occupiers without a direct constitutional challenge.
|
27 November 2020 |
|
Reported
Excluding domestic workers from COIDA unjustifiably breaches their rights to equality, dignity and social security.
Constitutional law — Labour/social security — COIDA s1(xix)(v) excludes domestic workers from COIDA protection — Whether exclusion violates rights to social security (s27), equality (s9) including intersectional/indirect discrimination, and dignity (s10) — Whether limitation justified — Remedy and retrospectivity — High Court’s duty to give reasons. |
19 November 2020 |
| October 2020 |
|
|
Reported
A dismissal is not automatically unfair where the true or dominant reason is bona fide operational requirements, not refusal to accept a demand.
Labour law – Section 187(1)(c) LRA – automatically unfair dismissals for refusal to accept an employer’s demand – interplay with operational‑requirements dismissals under sections 188/189 – retrenchment consultations versus collective bargaining – interpretation of 2014 amendment – use of Afrox causation/dominant‑cause analysis versus conventional fact‑evaluation to determine true reason for dismissal.
|
27 October 2020 |
| September 2020 |
|
|
Reported
Refusal of lengthy postponement to secure counsel and use of section 342A did not breach applicants' fair-trial rights.
Criminal procedure – right to legal representation of choice – limits on postponement to enable accused to raise funds; Judicial impartiality – test for reasonable apprehension of bias; Unreasonable delay – statutory inquiry and remedies under s342A Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977; Application of s342A(3)(d) to deem defence closed where accused persistently seek extended postponement; Constitutional jurisdiction engaged where bias and s342A issues arise.
|
16 September 2020 |
| August 2020 |
|
|
Reported
Court holds s197 applies: eNaTIS and services transferred as a business; effective date fixed at 5 April 2017 (physical takeover).
Labour Relations Act s197 — transfer of employment contracts on transfer of business as going concern; legal causa for transfer; effective date of transfer; public/statutory transferee not excluded; interim enforcement under Superior Courts Act s18(3) — jurisdictional limits and exceptional circumstances.
|
4 August 2020 |
| July 2020 |
|
|
Reported
Court read the amended citizenship provisions constitutionally, denied invalidity and ordered registration of applicants as citizens.
Citizenship — South African Citizenship Act (as amended 2010) — interpretation of section 2(1)(a) and (b) — "who is born in or outside the Republic" construed as stative, covering births before and after commencement — purposive, constitutionally compliant interpretation preferred to invalidation — presumption against retrospectivity — administrative recognition and registration ordered.
|
22 July 2020 |
|
Reported
Taxing Master misapplied tariff for counsel‑prepared affidavit perusal; execution and attachment set aside.
Taxation of costs; rule 17 SCA Rules; interpretation of tariff schedule; Part C 3(c) applies to perusal of affidavits composed or corrected by counsel; deference to Taxing Master but interference where tariff misapplied; setting aside execution and attachment where taxation altered.
|
21 July 2020 |
|
Reported
Whether income from restaurant patrons counts as income "in terms of" a franchise contract for section 24C(2) relief.
Tax law – Interpretation of section 24C(2) – meaning of "in terms of any contract" – requirement that income and future expenditure arise under the same contract. Contract law – Whether patron sale contracts and franchise agreements can be treated as a single or "inextricably linked" contract for tax relief. Administrative/tax procedure – Commissioner’s disallowance of section 24C allowance upheld where statutory requirements not met. Constitutional jurisdiction – Whether fact‑specific contractual interpretation raises an arguable point of law of general public importance.
|
21 July 2020 |
|
Reported
Direct appeal refused as moot; punitive attorney-and-client costs awarded for vexatious litigation.
Constitutional jurisdiction; direct appeals; mootness by statutory substitution (Financial Sector Regulation Act s300(3)); ex post facto recusal and nullification; abuse of court process; punitive costs (attorney-and-client) for vexatious litigation.
|
21 July 2020 |
|
Reported
Late admissibility rulings and reliance on unproved medical literature vitiated the applicant’s constitutional fair trial rights.
Criminal procedure — Fair trial (s 35(3)(i)) — Timeous rulings on admissibility — Late admission or rejection of exhibits at judgment stage may ambush accused and vitiate trial; Expert evidence — Judicial reliance on medical literature not adduced in evidence breaches right to challenge; Remedy — Conviction and sentence set aside; matter referred to DPP for re‑arraignment with different magistrate.
|
21 July 2020 |
| June 2020 |
|
|
Reported
Licensees exercising section 22 rights must comply with municipal bylaws unless a bylaw irreconcilably conflicts with or thwarts national law.
Constitutional law; municipal planning and zoning – scope of municipal competence – interaction with national telecommunications regulation (Electronic Communications Act s22) – application of section 22(2) ‘due regard’ to applicable law – conflict resolution (s156(3)) – bylaws invalid only if they irreconcilably conflict with national law or are adopted to thwart national legislation.
|
25 June 2020 |
|
Reported
Section 67(1) is a condonable procedural time‑bar; first initiation (3 Nov 2010) triggered the three‑year period.
Competition law – Interpretation of time‑bar – s67(1) Competition Act construed as a procedural time‑bar, not absolute prescription; capable of condonation under s58(1)(c)(ii). Procedural law – Tribunal powers – s58(1)(c)(ii) grants Tribunal express power to condone non‑compliance with time limits (subject to specified exceptions). Administrative procedure – complaint initiation – amendment of an initiation is permissible; first initiation date (3 Nov 2010) constituted trigger for s67(1). Constitutional law – access to courts (s34) – statutory interpretation must be constitutionally compliant and purposive.
|
24 June 2020 |
|
Reported
Independent schools providing basic education must follow fair, child‑centred procedures before terminating a learner’s enrolment.
Constitutional law – education – independent schools providing basic education – horizontal application of the Bill of Rights (section 8(2)) – negative obligation not to diminish right to basic education (section 29(1)(a)). Children – best interests principle (section 28(2)) – procedural and substantive component – right to appropriate opportunity to make representations when exclusion from school is contemplated. Contracts – termination clauses in school parent contracts – enforceability limited by constitutional values/public policy where children’s rights affected.
|
17 June 2020 |
|
Reported
Enforcement of renewal clauses upheld; resisting party must explain non‑compliance under Barkhuizen public‑policy test.
Contract law — judicial enforcement of contracts — public policy informed by constitutional values — Barkhuizen two‑stage test for assessing enforcement. Good faith, fairness and reasonableness inform but do not constitute autonomous grounds to avoid contractual terms. Botha confined to statutory context; disproportionality is not a general free‑standing ground. Onus on party resisting enforcement to explain non‑compliance. Courts to exercise restraint when invalidating contracts, but must give effect to constitutional values.
|
17 June 2020 |
|
Reported
Electoral Act unconstitutional to the extent it bars independent candidates; section 19(3)(b) and section 18 protect individual right to stand.
Constitutional law — political rights — section 19(3)(b) includes the right to stand for public office as an individual — freedom of association (section 18) protects negative right not to be compelled to associate — Electoral Act unconstitutional to extent it requires election only via political parties — limitation unjustified under section 36 — declaration prospective and suspended for 24 months.
|
11 June 2020 |
| May 2020 |
|
|
Reported
OUTA interim‑interdict test applies to the Public Protector; direct appeals refused; Biowatch and personal‑costs principles adjusted.
Interim interdicts — suspension of Public Protector remedial action — applicable test (OUTA/Setlogelo in constitutional context) — separation of powers — appealability of interlocutory orders — interests of justice — Biowatch costs principle — personal costs orders against public officials (bad faith/gross negligence).
|
29 May 2020 |
|
Reported
|
26 May 2020 |
|
Reported
A conciliated unfair dismissal referral covers automatically unfair claims, and lis alibi pendens defence was unavailable.
Labour law – Labour Relations Act s191 – jurisdiction to adjudicate dismissal disputes – referral to conciliation relates to disputes about fairness, not causes of action. Automatically unfair dismissal – characterization of dispute – conciliation of unfair dismissal can encompass automatically unfair claims. Civil procedure – lis alibi pendens – requirements: same parties, same cause of action, same subject matter; defence failed where review concerned jurisdiction and certificate only. Companies – substitution – liquidators may replace company as respondents where company in liquidation and liquidators do not oppose. Costs – costs awarded where employer–employee relationship ended and unsuccessful respondents were liquidators.
|
6 May 2020 |
| March 2020 |
|
|
Reported
Whether unlawful proceeds are protected by section 25(1) and whether proportionality governs their forfeiture under POCA.
POCA — chapter 6 forfeiture — proceeds of unlawful activities — extent to which section 25(1) protects unlawful proceeds — applicability and standard of proportionality inquiry to forfeiture under section 50(1)(b) — evidentiary effect of purported repayments and sham loan agreements. |
26 March 2020 |
|
Reported
A union cannot claim organisational rights based on members admitted outside the membership scope set by its registered constitution.
Labour law – Organisational rights – Section 4(1)(b) LRA – "subject to its constitution" – union constitutions define eligibility for membership – ultra vires admissions – representivity for organisational rights – freedom of association balanced with contractual and public effects of registered constitutions. |
26 March 2020 |
|
Reported
A challenge to procedural defects in an exploration‑right application was moot after withdrawal; leave refused and punitive costs ordered.
Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act — application for exploration right — compliance with prescribed form and publication requirements under ss 79 and 10 and MPRD Regulations.* Administrative law — ripeness/prematurity — challenge to pre‑grant administrative acts in multi‑stage statutory process.* Mootness — withdrawal of application — interests of justice test for hearing moot appeals.* Costs — punitive attorney-and-client costs (including two counsel) for abusive or vexatious conduct.
|
24 March 2020 |
|
Reported
When a conviction is set aside on appeal, termination under Defence Act s59(1)(d) is reversed and employment never validly terminated.
Defence Act s59(1)(d) – termination ex lege – effect of a conviction and sentence set aside on appeal – jurisdictional facts must be final and lawful; Statutory interpretation – purposive reading and s39(2) conformity with Bill of Rights; Labour law – invalid dismissal treated as never having occurred; Constitutional rights – right of appeal (s35(3)(o)) and fair labour practices (s23).
|
20 March 2020 |
|
Reported
Teaching-hospital joint appointments placed academic specialists in the public service, making them entitled to a sectoral scarce skills allowance.
Labour law — collective agreements — scope of sectoral bargaining council — definition of "public service" (s 213 LRA; Public Service Act) — joint university–provincial teaching-hospital appointments — posts on fixed establishment — entitlement to scarce skills allowance — review standard for arbitral awards (material error/unreasonableness) — union joint admission to bargaining council.
|
20 March 2020 |
| February 2020 |
|
|
Reported
Whether Rule 15 grants litigants pre‑pleading access to Commission investigation records and how Rule 53 disclosure and jurisdiction interact.
Competition law – access to information – Commission Rules (Rule 15) – public access to Commission investigation records post‑referral – interaction with Tribunal discovery regime (Rule 22) and Uniform Rules – Promotion of Access to Information Act (PAIA) section 7 not incorporated into Rule 14(1)(e) – meaning of reasonable period for production – Rule 53 review record – jurisdiction of Competition Appeal Court and competence of single judge under section 38(2A).
|
20 February 2020 |
| January 2020 |
|
|
Reported
Whether section 189(1) LRA permits representative-only consultation in retrenchments, excluding an employee’s chosen union, and is constitutional.
Labour law — Retrenchment — Section 189(1) LRA — hierarchy of consulting partners and exclusion of non-party unions. Constitutional law — Right to fair labour practices (s23) — Whether it includes an individual right to be consulted in retrenchment. Labour law — Majoritarianism and collective bargaining — applicability to retrenchment consultation. Constitutional rights — Equality (s9) and freedom of association (s18) — potential limits where collective agreements exclude unions of choice. Administrative/constitutional review — Section 23(1)(d) extensions subject to principle of legality and judicial review.
|
23 January 2020 |
