background image
profile image

Constitutional Court of South Africa

The Constitutional Court of South Africa is a supreme constitutional court established by the Constitution of South Africa, and is the apex court in the South African judicial system, with general jurisdiction. The Court was first established by the Interim Constitution of 1993, and its first session began in February 1995. It has continued in existence under the Constitution of 1996. The Court sits in the city of Johannesburg. The Constitutional Court has jurisdiction to hear any matter if it is in the interests of justice for it to do so. (Banner image credit: By André-Pierre from Stellenbosch, South Africa.)
Physical address
Constitutional Court, 1 Hospital Street, Constitution Hill, Braamfontein, South Africa, 2017
51 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Labels
  • Topics
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
51 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
December 2021
Reported
Whether surviving partners in qualifying permanent life partnerships are entitled to maintenance and intestate succession benefits under the Constitution.
Constitutional law — equality and dignity — marital status discrimination — whether surviving partner in a permanent life partnership with reciprocal duties of support may claim maintenance and intestate succession benefits — reading‑in remedies and 18‑month suspension for Parliament to legislate; precedent (Volks) and common‑law developments (Paixão) considered.
31 December 2021
Reported
An aspirant asylum seeker who expresses intent must be afforded an opportunity to apply; non‑refoulement prevails despite amendments.
Refugee law — applicability of Refugees Amendment Act (2017) and new Regulations — interaction with section 2 non‑refoulement; whether an illegal foreigner who expresses an intention to apply for asylum must be afforded the opportunity to apply; effect of delay in evincing intention; requirement for immigration officer interview and showing good cause for lack of asylum transit visa; lawfulness of detention.
30 December 2021
Reported
Leave to appeal refused where claim depended on disputed facts and no arguable constitutional issue justified developing the directing‑mind doctrine.
Company law – Liquidation – Standing of creditor – requirement to establish an undisputed liquidated claim before seeking liquidation. Company law – Directing‑mind/controlling‑mind doctrine – attribution of director’s acts to company – doctrine applied pragmatically; no need for constitutional development absent rights infringement. Constitutional jurisdiction – raising an arguable point of law of general public importance – misapplication of settled test not constitutive of a constitutional issue. Civil procedure – leave to appeal – material factual disputes preclude Constitutional Court jurisdiction on leave application.
13 December 2021
Reported
Leave to appeal refused where dispute concerned factual findings and settled law on trustees’ authority to bind a trust.
Insolvency and sequestration – standing to sequestrate a trust – requirement to establish a claim, act of insolvency and advantage to creditors. Trust law – authority of trustees – powers determined by trust deed; quorum/number of trustees as capacity-defining condition; single trustee cannot bind trust absent authority. Constitutional jurisdiction – apex court will not entertain appeals that raise only factual disputes; misdirection on facts is not an arguable point of law of general public importance. Civil procedure – application of Plascon-Evans rule in motion proceedings involving factual disputes.
13 December 2021
Reported
Labour Court may, in exceptional circumstances, substitute CCMA demarcation awards; substitution upheld here assigning employers to MIBCO.
Labour law — Demarcation (s62 LRA) — CCMA commissioner’s award subject to review — Labour Court’s powers under ss 145 and 158 LRA — Substitution of arbitration awards permissible only in exceptional circumstances — NEDLAC consultation mandatory in s62 process — historic determinations not necessarily binding.
10 December 2021
Reported
Whether challenges to municipal manager appointments under invalidated section 54A should proceed given delay and mootness.
Local government — Section 54A Municipal Systems Act — validity and interpretation — effect of SAMWU declaration and expiry of suspension — mootness — delays and condonation — remedial powers under section 172 and doctrine of objective constitutional invalidity — just and equitable relief — public interest and service delivery.
8 December 2021
Reported
Whether constitutional damages are an appropriate remedy for a municipality’s persistent breach of the right to adequate housing.
Constitutional law — Section 26 (housing) — Enforcement remedies; Section 38 — Appropriate relief — constitutional damages; Socio‑economic rights — subsidiarity and reasonableness; Remedies — contempt, structural interdict, eviction, delict; Finality — once‑and‑for‑all/res judicata; Admission of further evidence in Constitutional Court.
7 December 2021
November 2021
Reported
Where mental incapacity made instituting an RAF claim impossible, prescription did not run until curator appointment.
Road Accident Fund Act — s 23(1) time‑bar — s 23(2)(b),(c) exceptions — Prescription Act s 13(1)(a) — common‑law impossibility/ incapacity principles (lex non cogit ad impossibilia; contra non valentem) — interpretation under s 39(2) and s 233 of the Constitution — CRPD relevance — prescription does not run where objectively impossible to institute claim until curator appointed.
19 November 2021
Reported
Section 66(2)(c) requires a proportionality‑based reasonableness assessment of secondary strikes.
Labour law – Secondary strikes – s 66(2)(c) LRA – "reasonable in relation to possible direct or indirect effect" imports proportionality and reasonableness; threshold for effect is low (possible, indirect) but courts must weigh nature, extent and impact of secondary strikes on primary and secondary employers; assessment is fact‑sensitive and may consider form, duration, number of employees, sector, safety/violence and mitigation; interdict under s 66(3) permissible where no effect on primary employer or disproportionate harm to secondary employer.
12 November 2021
Reported
A court must set aside invalid administrative recognition unless just and equitable reasons justify suspension; the State must pay costs.
Constitutional and administrative law – review of administrative action under PAJA – setting aside Identification and Recognition decisions as unlawful, unconstitutional and invalid. Constitutional remedies – section 172(1) remedial command: default is immediate setting aside of invalid administrative action; suspension or limitation requires weighty justification. Limits of judicial process power – section 173 cannot be used to avoid section 172(1) consequences. Costs – Biowatch/Affordable Medicines principle: where private litigant substantially succeeds against the State in vindicating constitutional rights, the State ordinarily pays costs.
12 November 2021
Reported
Subsidiarity bars direct constitutional claims where statutory and contractual labour remedies are available; no constitutional defamation issue shown.
Constitutional law – subsidiarity – whether plaintiff may directly invoke sections 23 and 17 when Labour Relations Act and contractual remedies provide relief. Labour law – organisational rights – enforcement via LRA/CCMA and contractual dispute-resolution. Defamation – assessment through constitutional prism requires a demonstrated constitutional dimension; mere labelling insufficient. Jurisdiction – Constitutional Court will not entertain ordinary disputes dressed as constitutional issues. Costs – Biowatch applies where private parties perform public functions; costs orders set aside; parties to bear own costs.
12 November 2021
Reported
When a court-appointed practitioner in a voluntary business rescue resigns, the company’s board appoints the replacement under section 139(3).
Companies Act (Chapter 6) – Business rescue – Appointment, removal and replacement of practitioners – Interpretation of section 139(3) – Whether replacement of practitioner appointed under s130(6)(a) vests with company (board) or with independent creditors represented in s130 proceedings – Statutory purpose of efficient rescue and avoidance of lacunae.
9 November 2021
Reported
Court ordered urgent enforcement of housing-order: respondents must repair roof to render home fit for habitation.
Constitutional law — urgency in enforcement of housing-related orders; interpretation of remedial orders — scope limited to pleaded restoration but includes defects integral to roof replacement; enforcement — power to order municipal inspection and cost-shifting where respondents fail to comply; rights engaged — dignity, access to housing, basic education.
8 November 2021
Reported
The Premier’s withdrawal and recognition notices were unlawful because they were taken under the wrong statutory provision and are set aside prospectively.
Constitutional and administrative law – traditional leadership – removal and recognition of senior traditional leaders – interaction between the Traditional Leadership and Governance Framework Act and provincial legislation – role of provincial commissions and the Premier. Statutory interpretation – s12, s13 and s30 of Limpopo Act read with ss25–26 of Framework Act – when Premier may implement commission recommendations. Legality – functionary must act under correct statutory power; a decision taken under a wrong provision is unlawful (Harris principle). Remedy – setting aside of invalid administrative acts and the discretionary imposition of prospective effect to avoid prejudice and disruption.
5 November 2021
October 2021
Reported
Warrantless searches under s13(7)(c) unconstitutional; searches in cordoned areas must comply with CPA ss21–22; damages declined.
Constitutional law — South African Police Service Act s13(7)(c) — warrantless searches — overbreadth and privacy (s14) infringement — severance and interim reading-in — searches within cordoned areas must comply with Criminal Procedure Act ss21–22; paragraphs (a) and (b) of s13(7) upheld; constitutional damages not awarded where effective alternative remedies exist; interdict granted against non-SAPS officials who raided without authority.
22 October 2021
Reported
An arbitrator’s reinstatement order should stand unless intolerability is proven to a high, weighty evidentiary standard.
Labour law — s 193 LRA — reinstatement is primary remedy for substantively unfair dismissal; s 193(2)(b) permits consideration of intolerability but requires high threshold; heightened evidentiary burden where employee exonerated; review vs appeal — Labour Court must apply Sidumo reasonableness standard and may not rehear the matter; peremption — policy considerations may justify not enforcing acquiescence; condonation granted.
19 October 2021
Reported
Appellate court wrongly substituted its view for a specialist tribunal’s findings; prohibition of the hospital merger was justified.
Competition law – Mergers – section 12A assessment of substantial lessening of competition; deference to specialist Tribunal’s factual and predictive findings; interpretation of Competition Act with reference to the Preamble and Constitution (ss 7(2), 27, 39(2)); public interest in access to health care; remedy – when prohibition appropriate versus conditional approval.
15 October 2021
Reported
Dissolution under section 139(1)(c) is a last resort; exceptional circumstances, appropriateness and cooperative engagement are required.
Local government — Provincial intervention under section 139(1)(c) — dissolution of municipal council — jurisdictional facts: failure to fulfil executive obligation, appropriateness, and exceptional circumstances — appropriateness requires contextual assessment; less intrusive measures relevant — principle of legality and cooperative governance — remedy: investigation under item 14(4) of Schedule 1 rather than mandamus forcing attendance.
4 October 2021
September 2021
Reported
A section 12B referral does not oust High Court jurisdiction; courts may refuse stays pending arbitration in appropriate circumstances.
Petroleum Products Act s12B – statutory arbitration does not oust High Court jurisdiction; Arbitration Act s6(2) – judicial discretion to grant or refuse stay; stay of proceedings – timing, undue delay and scope of arbitral relief; franchise agreements – proof of new contract and right of occupation; access to courts (s34) – not infringed by s6(2).
28 September 2021
Reported
Section 10 of the Births and Deaths Registration Act unlawfully discriminated against unmarried fathers and was severed as constitutionally invalid.
Births and Deaths Registration Act — s10 (notice of birth of child born out of wedlock) — constitutionality — unfair discrimination (s9) on grounds of marital status, sex and gender — children’s rights (name and nationality) and dignity — Harksen multi-stage test; remedy — severance of s10 and proviso in s9(2); interplay of s9 and s10; parental consent and best interests of the child.
22 September 2021
Reported
An organ of state university must justify removing an existing language‑of‑choice under section 29(2) before phasing out Afrikaans.
Constitutional law; education — section 29(2) — right to receive education in an official language of choice; organ of state obligation to consider all reasonable educational alternatives; equity, practicability and redress requirements; review under legality and rationality; procedural compliance with internal rules; remedy and suspended order to enable implementation.
22 September 2021
Reported
Direct access granted but challenge to the Commission’s candidate-deadline extension dismissed; Commission may amend timetable under s11(2).
Election law — Interpretation of court orders — Scope of amendments “reasonably necessary” to election timetable; Electoral Commission’s statutory power under s11(2) of the Municipal Electoral Act to amend timetables for free and fair elections; reviewability of timetable amendments and allegations of ulterior motive.
20 September 2021
Reported
Court refused pre-emptive judicial postponement beyond constitutional 90 days but set aside proclamation for foreclosing registration weekend.
Constitutional law – local government elections – section 159(2) – regularity of elections; Electoral law – Electoral Commission’s duty to ensure free and fair elections – limits of judicial pre-emptive relief; Administrative law – rationality review of proclamation – setting aside proclamation for foreclosing voter registration; Statutory interpretation – Municipal Structures Act and Municipal Electoral Act – interaction with section 172 remedial powers; Covid-19 – pandemic as factor in assessing freeness and fairness; Remedy – section 172(1)(b) just and equitable orders; Separation of powers – role of Parliament in amending constitutional election time-limits.
18 September 2021
Reported
Applicant’s rescission bid dismissed — deliberate non‑participation, no rescindable error, finality and interests of justice prevail.
Direct access — rescission of Constitutional Court order; Rule 42(1)(a) — ‘granted in absence’ and ‘erroneously granted’ requirements; common‑law rescission — reasonable explanation and bona fide defence; finality, functus officio and legal certainty; interests of justice and scope to revisit final orders; constitutionality of motion procedure in contempt leading to imprisonment (s 12(1)(b), s 35(3)) — dissenting view; role of international law (interpretative aid vs. domestic ground for rescission).
17 September 2021
Reported
An organ of state is estopped from denying payment for court‑ordered audit work and must consider procurement deviation to appoint the auditor.
• Administrative law – enforcement of constitutional court orders – ensuring compliance and setting timelines. • Procurement law – s 217 Constitution; Treasury Regulation 16A.6.4 (deviation from competitive bidding). • Estoppel – prior acceptance and payment estop an organ of state from denying contractual completion and refusing payment for subsequent court-ordered work. • Relief – direction to consider deviation appointment, negotiated fees with fallback fee determination, timelines for document exchange and Treasury approval.
10 September 2021
Reported
Labour disputes over collective agreements lie in arbitration; courts must not order costs without reasons and fairness under s162 LRA.
Labour law — jurisdiction — interpretation and application of alleged collective agreements — s24 LRA; Costs in labour matters — presumption that costs do not follow the result; s162 LRA fairness standard; Constitutional right of access to dispute-resolution fora (s34) and protection of labour rights (s23).
7 September 2021
Reported
A magistrate must receive evidence relevant to the Minister’s section 11 surrender decision; appellate courts may re-open proceedings.
Extradition — section 10 committal enquiry — scope of evidence admissible; magistrate obliged to receive evidence relevant to Minister’s section 11 surrender decision. Extradition — interaction of Geuking, Garrido and Robinson II — magistrate may receive but not decide section 11 matters. Remedies — appellate courts may re-open committal proceedings or order corrective measures under section 13(2) of the Extradition Act and s172 of the Constitution.
6 September 2021
Reported
Section 12B arbitration does not oust High Court jurisdiction; stays must only be refused for compelling reasons.
Petroleum Products Act s12B — statutory arbitration does not oust High Court jurisdiction; Arbitration Act s6 applies mutatis mutandis; stay of proceedings requires compelling reasons to refuse referral where s12B invoked; courts must consider s12B’s remedial purpose and industry context (Business Zone).
3 September 2021
August 2021
Reported
Regulatory registration duties under Child Care Act do not create private-law duty to ensure daily safety at ECD centres.
Delict — Wrongfulness — Legal duty — Whether regulatory registration duties under Child Care Act/regulations and aspirational Guidelines translate into a private-law duty to ensure day-to-day safety at Early Childhood Development (ECD) centres; statutory interpretation of regulation 30(4); public-policy considerations (foreseeability, alternative remedies, chilling effect); scope of provincial oversight versus operational control.
27 August 2021
July 2021
Reported
Section 10(1) invalid to the extent it proscribes "hurtful" speech; applicant’s article declared hate speech under the narrowed test.
Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act — section 10(1) — constitutionality — "hurtful" held vague and unconstitutional; reasonable‑person objective test for hate speech; paragraphs (a)–(c) read conjunctively; sexual orientation as prohibited ground justified; remedial reading‑in suspended for 24 months; applicant’s article constituted hate speech.
30 July 2021
Reported
A water board’s differential tariff was rational and lawful; the Minister lacked statutory power to approve tariffs.
Water services law – Water Services Act s31 – water boards’ power to set and enforce tariffs; differentiation and cross-subsidies. Administrative law – rationality review (decisional vs procedural rationality) – differentiation lawful if rationally connected to legitimate objective. Constitutional principle of legality – executive may not exercise powers not conferred by statute. Local Government: Municipal Finance Management Act s42 – does not itself empower Minister to approve water-board tariffs.
23 July 2021
Reported
Reinstatement restores employee, not enriches; back pay must use correct earnings and account for subsequent lower pay.
Labour law — unfair dismissal — reinstatement and back pay — mitigation by securing subsequent employment — correct quantification requires using accurate prior and subsequent earnings; reinstatement should restore, not enrich.
6 July 2021
Reported
Whether the Public Protector lawfully found the President breached the Executive Ethics Code over CR17 campaign donations.
Executive Members’ Ethics Act and Executive Ethics Code – interpretation of ‘wilfully mislead’ – Public Protector’s investigative powers under section 182 and Members Act – distinction between state affairs and internal party campaigns – duty to disclose campaign donations as personal benefit – audi alteram principle and disclosure of adverse evidence – limits on Public Protector’s remedial and supervisory orders; remit of constitutional challenge to Code.
1 July 2021
June 2021
Reported
Whether unsuspended punitive imprisonment may be imposed in civil contempt motion proceedings without criminal trial safeguards.

Constitutional law — contempt of court — direct access — admissibility of extra‑curial public statements as hearsay — distinction between coercive (suspended) and punitive (unsuspended) committal — limits of civil contempt procedure in imposing punitive custodial sentences — interaction with sections 12 and 35(3) rights — role of DPP and referral for criminal prosecution — costs (punitive).

29 June 2021
Reported
Leave to appeal refused: succession dispute was factual and academic; SCA’s remarks about varying a trust deed were obiter and not binding.
Trust law – conflict between trust deed and later-adopted governing document – whether a church constitution can vary a trust deed and effect succession. Interpretation – factual findings versus questions of law; obiter dicta versus ratio decidendi. Constitutional jurisdiction – leave to appeal under s167(3)(b)(ii); interests of justice and academic disputes. Separation of powers – judicial interpretation of statutes does not amount to usurpation of legislative power. Trust Property Control Act – alleged inability to vary trust provisions by extraneous instruments (no precedent established).
22 June 2021
Reported
Union’s challenge to dismissals lacked prospects, but Labour Appeal Court’s unexplained costs order breached labour-costs principles and was set aside.
Labour law – dismissal for safety breaches – wilful disregard of verbal and written instructions in a mining context can justify dismissal. Labour procedure – costs in labour matters – the rule that costs follow the result does not ordinarily apply; courts must provide reasons when awarding costs (Zungu; Dorkin). Judicial review – appeal court may intervene where costs orders reflect an improper exercise of discretion. Constitutional jurisdiction – appeals engaging section 23 (fair labour practices) and section 34 (access to courts).
20 June 2021
Reported
Leave to appeal refused; applicants ordered to pay punitive attorney-and-client costs for vexatious baseless attacks on judges.
Constitutional Court — leave to appeal — Anton Piller order — in camera hearings — Biowatch principle inapplicable to frivolous or private disputes — vexatious allegations against judicial officers — punitive costs (attorney and client).
18 June 2021
Reported
17 June 2021
Reported
11 June 2021
May 2021
Reported
Loyalty‑programme sale and membership contracts, though linked, are not the ‘same’ for section 24C deferred‑income relief.
Tax — s 24C Income Tax Act — deferred‑income allowance for future expenditure — requirement that income and obligation arise from the ‘same’ contract — Big G sameness test — when inextricably linked contracts satisfy sameness — application to retailer loyalty programmes.
21 May 2021
Reported

Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 — Section 276B — non-retrospectivity of non-parole periods in terms of section 276B — non-applicability of section 276B at the time of sentencing.

Section 12(1)(a) of the Constitution — substantive and procedural requirements — fatal misdirection where no opportunity to make representations on non-parole period

 

21 May 2021
Reported
14 May 2021
Reported
13 May 2021
April 2021
Reported
Exclusion of adopted children from a private trust found unfairly discriminatory and contrary to public policy; adopted children declared beneficiaries.
Trust deed interpretation; 1937 Children’s Act proviso; whether "children/descendants/issue/legal descendants" include adopted children; unfair discrimination on ground of birth/adoptive status; conflict between freedom of testation and equality/public policy; remedy — treating exclusion pro non scripto and declaring adopted children beneficiaries.
16 April 2021
Reported
Section 21(2)(a) of the Matrimonial Property Act perpetuates apartheid-era racial and gender discrimination and is unconstitutional.
Matrimonial property — Section 21(2)(a) MPA unconstitutional as perpetuating racial and gender discrimination from s22(6) BAA; intersectional harm to Black women; remedy converting affected marriages to community of property with opt-out and savings; costs against Minister; attorney’s fees forfeited.
14 April 2021
Reported
1 April 2021
Reported
A liability order separating quantum does not automatically preclude courts from considering non‑lump‑sum compensation or developing the common law.
Court orders – interpretation – contextual and purposive approach; res judicata – limits of liability orders; development of common law – section 173; constitutional values – right of access to healthcare and fair hearing; public-healthcare and undertaking-to-pay defences.
1 April 2021
February 2021
Reported
19 February 2021
Reported
RICA fails to safeguard privacy: designated‑judge independence, notification, ex parte protections, data management and journalist/lawyer safeguards.
Constitutional law — Privacy (s 14) — Interception of communications — Regulation of Interception of Communications and Provision of Communication‑Related Information Act (RICA) — Whether RICA affords adequate safeguards: independence of designated Judge, post‑surveillance notification, ex parte authorisation safeguards, data‑management procedures, special protections for journalists and lawyers — Bulk communications surveillance — lawfulness — Remedy: limited confirmation of invalidity, 36‑month suspension and interim read‑in of protections for notification and journalist/lawyer targets.
4 February 2021
January 2021
Reported
Direct access granted; respondent must obey commission summons and testify, with section 3(4) privileges (including against self-incrimination).
Constitutional procedure – direct access to Constitutional Court – urgency and interests of justice. Commissions Act – section 3 powers to summon witnesses; secretary issues summons; regulation 10(6) directions by Chairperson. Witnesses before commissions – duty to appear and answer lawful questions; no general right to remain silent. Privilege – section 3(4) incorporates privileges applicable in criminal trials, including against self-incrimination; witness must claim privilege before Chairperson. Amicus curiae – criteria for admission; two organizations admitted, one individual refused.
28 January 2021