High Court of South Africa Eastern Cape, Mthatha - 2014

4 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Labels
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
4 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
October 2014
Confession and pointing out reliably confirmed; convictions and life sentences for murder and housebreaking upheld.
Criminal law – Confession and pointing out – Admissibility and reliability – Section 209 CPA confirmation – Corrected recording errors and uninitialled amendments not fatal – Credibility assessment of accused’s evidence – Sentencing – Malgas guidelines – Life sentences appropriate where killing to prevent testimony and victims vulnerable.
30 October 2014
February 2014
Reported
The respondent’s summary judgment was set aside because the magistrate improperly condoned Rule non‑compliance.
Magistrates’ Court Rules — Rule 6(6) — failure to annex written contract — deemed irregular step under Rule 6(13); Rule 60/60A — scope — no general power of condonation to dispense with form or substance of rules; Summary judgment — Rule 14(1) — limited to specified categories; Affidavit in support — Rule 14(2) — ‘‘verify’’ means to swear positively to facts verifying cause and amount; Procedural fairness — irregularity to be remedied under Rules 60/60A, not condoned absent express rule or s54 conference.
27 February 2014
Reported
Court found provincial education authorities breached learners' right to basic education by failing to provide required school furniture and ordered prompt delivery.
* Education law – right to basic education (section 29(1)(a)) – immediately realisable right – provision of necessary resources including age and grade appropriate furniture. * Compliance with court orders – audit, verification and delivery plan – non-compliance of provincial education authorities. * Budgetary constraints – not a blanket defence to immediate obligations under section 29(1)(a). * Judicial remedies – supervisory jurisdiction; mandatory orders with fixed timeframes; conditional extension mechanism; costs order including two counsel.
20 February 2014
January 2014
Reported
Applicant failed to establish valid withdrawal or urgency; successor’s conditional recognition upheld and application dismissed with costs.
* Traditional leaders – Recognition and removal – Eastern Cape Traditional Leadership and Governance Act 4 of 2005 – Sections 18, 20 and 21 – identification, recognition, regency and removal. * Procedural law – Review of administrative decision – validity of royal-family withdrawal and requirement for proper customary process. * Acting/regent – cessation of acting role when identified successor attains majority. * Interdict – availability of statutory remedies and absence of irreparable harm. * Citizenship/residency – impact on eligibility under section 6(3) and conditional recognition.
30 January 2014