|
Citation
|
Judgment date
|
| December 2025 |
|
|
Interpleader with disputed ownership and contested trust validity must proceed to oral evidence under Rule 58(6)(c).
Interpleader — Uniform Rule 58 — Rule 58(6)(c) referral to oral evidence where material factual disputes exist; Rule 58(5) barring order available to applicant only; ownership of attached movables v incorporeal shares; rebuttable presumption of ownership from possession; validity and formation of trusts in execution context.
|
10 December 2025 |
|
High Court will not enforce another court’s order absent good and sufficient reasons; application dismissed.
Contempt of court; jurisdiction — High Court’s inherent jurisdiction to enforce another court’s order; s 106 Magistrates’ Courts Act; requirement of good and sufficient reasons; civil v criminal committal; declaratory relief.
|
10 December 2025 |
|
Third urgent application struck for lack of urgency; one-day payment delay did not impeach full-and-final consent order.
Urgency — self-created indebtedness; Consent order — full and final settlement; one-day banking delay not material; abuse of process — repeated urgent applications; costs awarded on party-and-party scale B.
|
10 December 2025 |
|
Court suspended execution of mortgaged property demolished for safety, allowing time to pursue third‑party claims and equitable resolution.
Mortgage bonds – Default judgment – Rule 46A and s26 constitutional protection of the home – Execution of demolished property – Suspension of execution to permit investigation of third‑party claims and equitable resolution – Reserve price for sale in execution.
|
10 December 2025 |
|
Arrest held lawful on reasonable suspicion, but detention beyond statutory period unlawful—R150,000 awarded.
Criminal procedure — Arrest without warrant — s 40(1)(b) CPA — objective reasonable suspicion; Detention — s 50 CPA — 48‑hour rule — unlawful continued detention; Quantum for unlawful detention.
|
10 December 2025 |
|
Interpreter miscommunication and failure to consider material facts led court to set aside refugee decisions and remit for reconsideration.
Refugee law; administrative law (PAJA) — condonation for late review; interpreter/miscommunication at RSDO interview; failure to address material averments; review and setting aside of RSDO and SCRA decisions; remittal for reconsideration; costs awarded to applicant.
|
9 December 2025 |
|
A late notice of intention to defend filed on the eve of a default hearing justified an attorney-and-client punitive costs order.
Civil procedure – default judgment – Rule 19(5) late notice of intention to defend – abuse of process – punitive costs (attorney-and-client) – costs to include expert and counsel fees.
|
9 December 2025 |
|
Review application filed outside PAJA's 180‑day limit; no condonation or reasons, so leave to appeal refused with costs.
Administrative law — Promotion of Administrative Justice Act s7(1) — 180‑day time limit for review of administrative decisions — condonation for late filing — Superior Courts Act s17(1)(a) — leave to appeal requires reasonable prospects of success or compelling reasons.
|
9 December 2025 |
|
A respondent’s reliance on an arbitration clause can constitute a bona fide defence, entitling it to leave to defend.
Arbitration clause – Special plea in summary judgment – Documents annexed to special plea can disclose an arbitrable dispute – Bona fide defence – Leave to defend granted – Arbitration Act s 3(2)(b).
|
8 December 2025 |
|
Provisional sequestration granted where respondent’s written admission of inability to pay and available assets suggested benefit to creditors.
Insolvency Act — provisional sequestration — requisites: liquidated claim, act of insolvency or factual insolvency, and reason to believe sequestration will advantage creditors; s8(g) written admission of inability to pay constitutes act of insolvency; s8(e) arrangement to be released requires clear offer to be released wholly/partially; advantage to creditors may be inferred from unencumbered property and potential assets investigable by trustee.
|
8 December 2025 |
|
Final sequestration confirmed after respondent’s written admission of insolvency and undisputed liquidated claim by the creditor.
Insolvency — act of insolvency — written admission of inability to pay constitutes act of insolvency under s 8(e)/(g) of Insolvency Act; sequestration — requirements for final sequestration satisfied where creditor holds undisputed liquidated claim; procedural — challenge to attorney’s power of attorney must be raised under rule 7 and deponent need not personally be authorised.
|
8 December 2025 |
|
Leave to appeal granted against finding that bundled credit-life cover sold to vulnerable consumers was unreasonable and unlawful.
National Credit Act – Sections 106, 90 and 91 – Bundled credit-life insurance – Disability and retrenchment cover sold to consumers unable to claim – Unreasonable contractual terms and unreasonable claims procedure – Cross-subsidisation defence — Limits on raising unpleaded 2017 Credit Life Regulations on appeal – Leave to appeal under s17(1)(a)(ii) Superior Courts Act due to public interest.
|
8 December 2025 |
|
Leave to appeal granted against finding that bundled credit life cover sold to vulnerable consumers was unreasonable.
National Credit Act — bundled credit life insurance — disability and retrenchment cover sold to vulnerable consumers — unreasonableness of compulsory cover and claims procedure — contravention of ss 106, 90(1)(2), 91(1)(2) — 2017 Credit Life Regulations not relied on in Tribunal — cross-subsidisation rejected — leave to appeal granted under s17(1)(a)(ii).
|
8 December 2025 |
|
Final winding-up granted where lease debt proved and counterclaim for improvements contractually excluded.
Companies Act s345 – Winding-up for inability to pay debts; validity of lease where representative initialled pages and signed at end; Badenhorst/bona fide dispute principle; counterclaim for improvements contractually excluded by lease clause; discretion to refuse winding-up narrowly confined.
|
8 December 2025 |
|
A loan tied to future project funding held payable despite funding delays; provisional liquidation of the debtor ordered.
Companies Act – s344(f) winding-up for inability to pay – contract interpretation of suspensive condition vs tacit term – Badenhorst bona fide dispute threshold – s345 demand – provisional liquidation preserving potential survival of mining right.
|
8 December 2025 |
|
Internal, unpublished departmental memoranda lack external legal effect; contractors must exhaust NEC3 adjudication and settled claims are barred.
Administrative law — "administrative action" — internal departmental memoranda — requirement of external/public communication for legal effect; Contract law — NEC3 dispute-resolution — certification, adjudication and finality of adjudicator awards; Settlement/compromise — estoppel by accord and satisfaction; Procedural — failure to exhaust contractual remedies and failure to establish clear right for mandatory relief.
|
8 December 2025 |
|
Provisional sequestration dismissed because the respondent bona fide and reasonably disputed the alleged debt.
Insolvency Act s10 – provisional sequestration – requirement of a creditor’s claim – bona fide and reasonable dispute (Badenhorst rule) – Plascon-Evans application of disputes in motion proceedings – inference of insolvency rebutted by asset valuations – advantage to creditors speculative – potential abuse of process where parallel action pending.
|
5 December 2025 |
|
Interim maintenance application dismissed due to undisclosed prior agreements and factual disputes; respondent’s concessions incorporated.
Family law – Rule 43 maintenance pendente lite – prior Rule 43 order and signed settlement not disclosed – substantial disputes of fact – Rule 43 unsuitable where oral evidence required – interim maintenance limited to respondent’s admissions – costs: each party to pay own.
|
5 December 2025 |
|
Court refers contested customary‑marriage registration motion to trial, applying Plascon‑Evans and Room Hire; one confirmatory affidavit excluded.
Civil procedure – motion proceedings v action proceedings – Plascon-Evans application of test – referral to trial for oral evidence (Room Hire) – admissibility of confirmatory affidavit signed before main affidavit – Recognition of Customary Marriages Act s4(7) (application for registration).
|
5 December 2025 |
|
Exception upheld as to humiliation claim and employer liability partially, while assault and defamation claims stand; amendment permitted.
Delict — assault and dignitary harms — defamation — requirements for publication and meaning — exceptions — rules on pleadings: distinguishing conclusions from pleaded facta probanda — vicarious liability: requirement to plead connection to course and scope of employment — amendment allowed.
|
5 December 2025 |
|
Applicant failed to establish prima facie right to interim reinstatement amid disputed registered shareholding.
Companies Act s71 – removal of directors; share register (s50(4)) and share certificate (s49) as proof of shareholder rights; interim interdict requirements (prima facie right open to some doubt); director's right to make representations (in person or by representative), not an absolute right to legal representation; costs — attorney-and-client for hearing days for procedural non-compliance.
|
5 December 2025 |
|
Court awarded R60,000 for unlawful arrest and detention as solatium; interest and costs on Scale A.
Delict — Unlawful arrest and detention — assessment of quantum — solatium for deprivation of liberty — factors: duration, manner of arrest, humiliation, personal circumstances — reliance on Mahlangu, Tyulu, Olga, Diljan — costs on Scale A.
|
5 December 2025 |
|
Warrantless arrest lawful where cumulative medical and identification evidence gave reasonable suspicion under s 40(1)(b).
Criminal procedure – arrest without warrant – s 40(1)(b) CPA – objective reasonable suspicion; Schedule 1 offence (rape) involving a minor; J88 medical evidence and victim identification as cumulative grounds for lawful arrest; availability of alternative processes not determinative; absolution from instance on malicious prosecution claim.
|
5 December 2025 |
|
Whether the plaintiff must identify specific discovered documents relied upon for an amendment, permitting inspection under Rule 35(12).
Civil procedure – Rule 35(12) – production of documents referred to in affidavits or pleadings – implied references suffice; discovery bundles – obligation to identify specific documents relied upon – Commercial Court case management and fairness; bona fides of amendment applications.
|
5 December 2025 |
|
Provisional sequestration granted where body corporate proved unpaid levy debt, nulla bona and reasonable prospect of benefit to creditors.
Insolvency law – provisional sequestration – proof of unpaid debt (minimum R100) – nulla bona return as act of insolvency (s 8(b) Insolvency Act) – benefit to creditors – body corporate levies.
|
4 December 2025 |
|
High Court dismissed review of marriage registration because Regional Court divorce proceedings raised the same issues (lis alibi pendens).
Administrative law – review of Home Affairs’ registration of a marriage; lis alibi pendens – pending divorce in Regional Court; Regional Court jurisdiction (s29(1B) Magistrates' Courts Act); forum appropriateness; viva voce evidence vs review on affidavit.
|
4 December 2025 |
|
A late business rescue application suspends liquidation proceedings unless abuse is proven; adjournment and costs awarded per tender.
Companies Act s131(6) — business rescue application suspends liquidation proceedings — alleged abuse of process — timing and merits relevant but abuse must be proved — adjournment sine die — costs on attorney-and-client scale following a tender.
|
4 December 2025 |
|
Informal-earner’s uncorroborated income evidence can suffice; apply higher contingency rather than refuse loss-of-earnings award.
Delict — proof of loss of earnings by informal sector claimant — weight of uncorroborated oral evidence — joint minutes of experts binding — application of contingency to address evidentiary uncertainty — award of future medical expenses and loss of earnings.
|
4 December 2025 |
|
Condonation and reinstatement refused where appellants wilfully defaulted and failed to establish a bona fide defence.
Civil procedure – rescission of default judgment – requirements: reasonable explanation and bona fide defence – wilful default fatal – role of documentary evidence and admissions; condonation and reinstatement of lapsed appeal refused; National Credit Act not applicable to pleaded transaction.
|
4 December 2025 |
|
Summary judgment granted: written rental agreements enforceable; alleged misrepresentations and software charges do not defeat contract or State liability.
Contract law — summary judgment — need to disclose bona fide defence; vendor‑introduced finance structures and cession enforceability; written agreements prevail over alleged pre‑contractual representations; acceleration clauses and agreed interest (prime + 6%) enforceable; software charges from separate donation arrangement not part of rental obligations; State liability under s 60(1)(a) of the Schools Act for contractual loss arising from school activities.
|
4 December 2025 |
|
Final liquidation ordered: commercial insolvency established; bank’s termination lawful; counterclaim dismissed with costs.
Company law – Winding‑up for commercial insolvency; s345 deeming provisions; factual solvency vs commercial insolvency; abuse of process; bona fide dispute in liquidation; interpretation of demand and cancellation rights; contractual interpretation (Endumeni; Cool Ideas).
|
4 December 2025 |
|
State organs must coordinate and act to remove xenophobic vigilante blockades denying access to public healthcare.
Constitutional and statutory duties to ensure access to healthcare – removal of barriers to socio-economic rights (s 27) – National Health Act oversight obligations – municipal service-level agreement does not absolve provincial/national responsibility – police duty to prevent and investigate vigilante blockades (s 205(3)) – interim structural interdict to secure access to public clinics – separation of powers and National Treasury distinction (compelling state to act, not restraining powers).
|
4 December 2025 |
|
An on‑demand guarantee created a primary obligation enforceable on demand; respondents failed to raise a bona fide dispute, warranting final liquidation.
Companies law – Winding‑up – s345(1)(a) and (c) – On‑demand guarantees – Primary independent obligations enforceable on compliant written demand – Notarial bond perfection does not effect payment – Badenhorst bona fide dispute test – Admissibility of bank records and certificates.
|
3 December 2025 |
|
Leave to appeal a default final winding‑up order refused: such orders are ordinarily not appealable and no prospects of success shown.
Civil procedure — Liquidation — Final winding‑up order granted by default/unopposed — Appealability: default orders ordinarily not appealable as they are rescindable — Rescission under rule 42(1)(a) or common law — Leave to appeal under s 17(1) Superior Courts Act: reasonable prospects and compelling circumstances required — Costs de bonis propriis against director.
|
3 December 2025 |
|
Court allowed the State to re-open its case to admit crucial co-accused evidence, prioritising justice over finality.
Criminal procedure — re-opening State’s case after closure — requirements: reasonably sufficient explanation; prima facie likelihood of truth; material relevance — balancing finality and substantial justice — corruption charges (POCCA ss10(b), 3(b)) — s174 discharge — s158(2)(a) closed-circuit testimony.
|
3 December 2025 |
|
Appeal dismissed as moot; no practical effect and interests of justice do not warrant deciding spoliation merits.
Civil procedure – mootness – appeal dismissed where decision would have no practical effect; spoliation and electricity supply – fact specific; interests of justice exception not engaged.
|
2 December 2025 |
|
Court admits inquest and s112 evidence, convicts two officers for murder on common‑purpose findings, acquits one for lack of association.
Criminal law — Common purpose — Requirements and application; Admissibility — incomplete inquest records and inquest testimony; Right to silence — consequences of failure to testify when prima facie case established; Section 112 plea statement admissibility; Section 174 discharge test.
|
2 December 2025 |
|
Rescission refused: applicant represented, discovery default upheld, fraud unproven; costs awarded attorney-and-own-client.
Civil procedure – Rescission (Rule 42(1)(a) and common law) – striking out for discovery non‑compliance – order not grantable where applicant was represented – fraud allegations unproven – rescission not a substitute for appeal – costs on attorney-and-own-client scale.
|
1 December 2025 |
|
Rescission granted where respondent concealed an interim settlement and payments, requiring repayment and costs.
Family law – Rule 43 maintenance pendente lite – duty of utmost good faith and full disclosure – non-disclosure of settlement and payments – rescission for fraud – repayment of amounts and costs.
|
1 December 2025 |
|
A defendant’s request for reasons for a default judgment under Rule 49(1)(c) is irregular and will not be provided.
Civil procedure – Default judgment – Request for reasons under Uniform Rule 49(1)(c) (misstated as Rule 19(1)(c)) – Irregular procedural step – Default judgment provisional and lacking appellate character until finality – State duty to prevent procedural abuse.
|
1 December 2025 |
|
Court holds a request for reasons for a default judgment as a precursor to appeal is irregular and refused.
Civil procedure – Default judgment – Request for reasons – Invocation of Uniform Rule as precursor to appeal – Default judgments provisional and not ordinarily appealable – Irregular procedural step.
|
1 December 2025 |
|
Applicants failed to prove exclusive ownership; eviction under PIE not just and equitable, application dismissed.
PIE Act — Eviction — Two-stage enquiry — Unlawful occupation and just and equitable consideration; Intestate succession — representation rights of heir where co-holder died intestate and estate not wound up; Onus on applicant to establish exclusive right and that eviction is just and equitable; Family dispute — eviction refused; No costs order.
|
1 December 2025 |