profile image

Labour Court of South Africa, Port Elizabeth

The Labour Court has the same status as a high court. The Labour Court adjudicates matters relating to labour disputes. Appeals are made to the Labour Appeal Court.

Physical address
Bird street 2, Central Port Elizabeth, Port Elizabeth, 6001
11 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Labels
  • Outcomes
  • Case actions
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
11 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
December 2025
Panelist's failure to inform parties and afford a hearing vitiated the condonation ruling; matter remitted for de novo determination.
Labour law – review of condonation ruling – procedural fairness – rule 32(10) GPSSBC 2017 rules – right to be heard – gross irregularity under s 145(2)(a)(ii) LRA – Herholdt reasonableness test – remittal for de novo determination.
30 December 2025
November 2025
An employer cannot discipline for off‑duty misconduct absent a sufficient workplace nexus; phone‑access instructions must respect privacy.
Labour law – off‑duty misconduct – nexus to workplace required for disciplinary jurisdiction; dishonesty – requirement to have witnessed misconduct; privacy and employer access to company‑issued phones; reasonableness standard for review of arbitration awards (Sidumo).
14 November 2025
October 2025
Ambiguity in a certified arbitration award required clarification by the arbitrator before a contempt finding could be made.
Labour law – Contempt of court – certified arbitration award – requirements: order, notice, wilful and mala fide non‑compliance. Arbitration awards – clarity of relief – reinstatement orders must be clear and unequivocal to permit compliance and enforcement. Remedy – where an award is ambiguous, remit to the issuing arbitrator/bargaining council to vary or clarify the award before determining contempt.
16 October 2025
Arbitrator reasonably found dismissals unfair where employer failed to prove existence or communication of prohibitory workplace rules.
Labour law – unfair dismissal – substantive fairness – employer’s burden to prove existence, content and communication of workplace rule – use of fleet cards and swapping of tags – Sidumo reasonableness review of arbitration award.
13 October 2025
Late review denied where delay was unexplained and arbitration award was reasonable under Sidumo.
Labour law – condonation for late review under s145 LRA – factors: delay, explanation, prospects of success – Sidumo reasonableness review standard – misconduct: unauthorised use of state vehicle, failure to record trips, dishonesty – dismissal sanction considered reasonable.
10 October 2025
Enforcement stayed pending filing of s145(8) security; sheriff ordered to return attached vehicles.
Labour law – LRA s145(3),(7),(8) – security for stay of enforcement of arbitration award – approval versus provision of security – acceptable forms of security (trust deposit, bank guarantee, notarial bond) – automatic suspension on compliance – urgent application and return of attached property.
2 October 2025
August 2025
Reinstatement of a withdrawn labour review application refused due to inordinate delay, lack of explanation, and poor prospects of success.
Labour law – Review application – Application for reinstatement of withdrawn review – Good cause – Delay in filing record and procedural shortcomings – Prospects of success – Discretion of arbitrators in admitting evidence – Labour Relations Act, expeditious dispute resolution.
21 August 2025
June 2025
Arbitration award set aside; jurisdictional error found; case to be reheard.
Labour law – Review of arbitration award – Prescription of claim – Consistency with labour law principles – Jurisdictional error analysis
10 June 2025
May 2025
Leave to appeal refused where arbitrator's reinstate sanction for serious financial misconduct was irrational and reviewable.
Labour law — Review of arbitration award — Reasonableness and review grounds — Sanction review where arbitrator found serious financial misconduct — Dishonesty by omission and breakdown of trust — Remittal inappropriate — Completeness of record — Leave to appeal.
30 May 2025
Application for leave to appeal dismissed due to inadequate grounds related to arbitrator's decision and misconduct sanction.
Labour Law – application for leave to appeal – review vs. appellate court standards – misconduct sanction assessment – record completeness
30 May 2025
April 2025
Reported
An arbitrator unreasonably reinstated a municipal manager guilty of serious SCM and financial misconduct; dismissal was fair.
Labour law – review of arbitration – penalty-review where arbitrator interfered with employer’s sanction; Municipal law – accounting officer duties; Supply Chain Management (SCM) – Regulation 36, deviations and reporting obligations; MFMA – financial misconduct, irregular and unauthorised expenditure, variation orders and criminal/administrative consequences; Systems Act s57A(3) – re-employment prohibition after dismissal for financial misconduct.
7 April 2025