High Court of South Africa North-West, Mafikeng

The Judges currently  serving on duty at the North West High Court are:

  1. Hon. Judge President RD Hendricks
  2. Hon. Deputy Judge President Djaje
  3. Hon. Judge Petersen
  4. Hon. Judge Reid
  5. Hon. Judge Mfenyana
  6. Hon. Judge Reddy
22 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Labels
  • Case actions
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
22 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
March 2025
Appeal removed from roll due to incomplete, illegible record and procedural non-compliance; reconstruction and wasted costs ordered.
Civil procedure – Appeal from magistrate – Non-compliance with Uniform Rules (Rules 50, 51, 62) and Magistrates’ Court Rules (51(4), 51(8)) – Incomplete/illegible record – Absence of magistrate’s written reasons – Reconstruction of record (Muravha; Schoombie; Leslie) – Registrar’s duty before assigning hearing date – Security for costs – Wasted costs ordered.
31 March 2025
Court upholds applicant's summary judgment claim for a liquidated debt, rejecting challenges to deponent's authority and contract validity.
Civil procedure – summary judgment – authority of deponent – compliance with affidavit regulations – contract – acknowledgment of debt – quasi-mutual assent – liquidated claim – attorney-client costs.
28 March 2025
Default judgment awarded: first defendant vicariously liable for 43 days of unlawful arrest and detention; R650,000 awarded.
• Constitutional law – right to freedom and security of the person – unlawful arrest and detention – prima facie unlawfulness and State’s onus to justify. • Civil procedure – default judgment following valid notice of bar and failure to deliver pleas. • Vicarious liability – Minister of Police liable for acts of SAPS members executed in course of employment. • Damages – assessment of solatium for 43 days’ unlawful detention and uncontested expert evidence of PTSD. • Condonation – late delivery of statutory notice under Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Certain Organs of State Act condoned.
28 March 2025
27 March 2025
Condonation granted; appellant’s personal circumstances not substantial and compelling to avoid prescribed life sentence.
Criminal law – minimum prescribed sentence – s 51(1) Criminal Law Amendment Act – substantial and compelling circumstances – appellate interference (Malgas) – condonation for late notice under Rule 67(5A) – attorneys’ negligence and Dengetenge factors – aggravating factors: sustained assault, threats, illegal presence, lack of remorse.
27 March 2025
Opposed motion postponed due to counsel’s late withdrawal; applicant ordered to pay postponement costs and attorney conduct referred to regulator.
Civil procedure — opposed motion — late withdrawal of counsel for alleged non‑payment of fees — professional duties of attorneys — postponement ordered, costs on attorney and client scale, referral to Legal Practice Council.
24 March 2025
The defendant is liable for 100% of damages due to under-settlement of the Road Accident Fund claim.
Road Accident Fund – personal injury – quantum calculation – general damages – caregiving compensation – trust management.
20 March 2025
The respondent held vicariously liable for negligent maternity care causing neonatal death and emotional harm from mishandled remains.
Medical negligence — obstetric and neonatal care — breach of maternity care guidelines, inadequate monitoring and documentation, inappropriate oxytocin use, failure to perform indicated Caesarean — causation (factual and legal) of neonatal death — vicarious liability of provincial health authority — damages for emotional/psychological harm from mishandling of remains.
20 March 2025
Court grants interim interdict preventing municipality from removing applicant’s prepaid meters pending contractual action or review.
Urgent interim interdict – urgency under Uniform Rule 6(12); prima facie contractual right based on municipal minute; preservation of status quo – interdiction against removal of prepaid meters; non-joinder of third-party service provider and contracting authority not fatal; authority of deponent; costs on attorney-and-client scale.
20 March 2025
Court upholds appeal in case of wrongful arrest, granting R100,000 and costs due to defendants' absence.
Unlawful arrest and detention – application of Rule 32(2) of Magistrates’ Court Rules – undisputed claims in default judgment.
20 March 2025
The High Court reviewed and set aside maintenance proceedings due to gross irregularity in the respondent's legal representation.
Maintenance Law – Legal representation – Validity of right of appearance – Gross irregularity in proceedings – Fair hearing rights.
17 March 2025
A declaratory challenge to in duplum application was dismissed as incompetent, res judicata, and an abuse of court process.
Civil procedure — rule 6(5)(d) points — condonation for late filing; Declaratory relief — competence — inadmissible advisory declarations where law and prior judgment resolve issue; In duplum rule — settled principle; post-judgment interest and VAT must be accounted for; Abuse of process and costs on attorney-and-client scale.
17 March 2025
An unincorporated association lacked locus standi and produced inadequate affidavits, so its motion for collective relief was dismissed.
Administrative and Constitutional Law – Locus standi – Unincorporated associations lack separate legal personality and generally lack locus standi to sue in their own name. Class actions – Certification required for representative relief; where class-action certification is absent, relief under s38(d) must be established. Civil procedure – Sufficiency of founding affidavits – material averments, identification of affected persons, authorisation and quantification of damages required; some relief unsuitable for motion proceedings. Service of process – Proper service required for a respondent to be before the court.
13 March 2025
Unlawful arrest and brief detention in inhuman conditions warrant R120,000 solatium, interest and party-and-party costs.
Constitutional right to personal liberty – arbitrary and unlawful arrest and detention – solatium for injured feelings. Assessment of quantum for unlawful arrest/detention – consider duration, circumstances of arrest, police conduct, absence of explanation/apology, cell conditions and plaintiff’s status. Police refusal to allow prescribed medication and inhuman cell conditions aggravate award. High Court jurisdiction justified for matters concerning deprivation of liberty. Costs – party-and-party scale B awarded; magistrate’s court scale not appropriate.
13 March 2025
Application struck from urgent roll due to lack of urgency and alternative redress available on scheduled future date.
Urgency – Interim Protection Order – Application to suspend operation of order due to purported financial harm – Rule 6(12) urgency requirements.
12 March 2025
Arrest without objectively reasonable suspicion was unlawful; detention claim failed for lack of pleaded evidence.
Police powers of arrest – section 40(1)(b) and (e) CPA and s36 GLAA – requirement of objectively sustainable reasonable suspicion – duty to investigate and assess explanations before arrest – omission to plead/lead evidence on detention conditions defeats unlawful detention claim.
12 March 2025
Commission report and Premier’s acceptance set aside for incomplete record, lack of reasons, and quorum/ procedural defects.
Administrative law — judicial review of administrative action under PAJA — duty to provide adequate reasons (s33(2) Constitution; s5 PAJA); Rule 53 record — completeness and right to a proper record for review; statutory commissions — quorum and meaningful participation; principle of legality — procedural rationality in decisions recognizing traditional leaders.
12 March 2025
Reported
Unlawful arrest due to defective service of protection orders and malicious prosecution without reasonable and probable cause.
Protection from Harassment Act – service of interim and final protection orders – Regulation 28 and statutory requirement for service by clerk, sheriff or peace officer; telephone ‘service’ not authorised. Criminal Procedure – arrest without warrant – necessity of warrant/affidavit under Protection from Harassment Act (Section 11) and application of Section 11(4)(b) and (5) before immediate arrest. Malicious prosecution – absence of reasonable and probable cause; prosecution under incorrect statute; animus injuriandi established where prosecutors continued in reckless disregard of defects. Damages – assessment of solatium for unlawful arrest/detention and malicious prosecution; awards: R480,000 and R200,000 respectively; interest and costs ordered.
11 March 2025
The High Court upheld a life sentence for multiple rape, emphasizing crime severity over personal circumstances.
Criminal Law – Sentencing – Rape – Life imprisonment prescribed minimum – Whether personal circumstances of appellant justified deviation from life sentence – No substantial and compelling circumstances found.
6 March 2025
Council meeting notice via WhatsApp upheld; municipal regulations complied with.
Local Government Law – Council Meetings – Service of Meeting Notices – Use of electronic means for notification as per adopted municipal rules.
6 March 2025
Plaintiff with permanent traumatic brain injury awarded R5.9m for loss of earnings and past medical expenses.
• Road Accident Fund – damages for loss of earning capacity and past medical expenses following traumatic brain injury; actuarial valuation and contingencies; admissibility of expert evidence by affidavit (Rule 38(2)).
6 March 2025
Conviction for failure to pay maintenance set aside due to magistrate’s unfair trial conduct and denial of right to call witnesses.
Criminal procedure – Maintenance Act s31(1) – elements and prosecution onus; Maintenance Act s41 – conversion to maintenance enquiry; Right to a fair trial – right to call witnesses and to full cross‑examination; Judicial conduct – impatience and procedural impropriety vitiating proceedings; Criminal Procedure Act s186 – limits on court calling witnesses.
5 March 2025