background image

Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa

The Supreme Court of Appeal is, except in respect of certain labour and competition matters, the second highest court in South Africa. In terms of the Constitution, it is purely an appeal court and may decide only appeals and issues connected with appeals. (Banner image by Ben Bezuidenhout).
Physical address
Cnr Mirriam Makeba & President Brand Streets, Bloemfontein, Free State, 9301
214 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Labels
  • Outcomes
  • Case actions
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
214 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
December 1991
Copyright owner entitled to interdict and delivery‑up of infringing reproductions and tools; account of profits dismissed.
Copyright — s24(1) Copyright Act 98 of 1978 — remedies available to copyright owner — delivery‑up of infringing copies and 'plates' (tools, dies, jigs) — Anton Piller seizure evidence — account of profits and additional damages — costs attorney and client.
4 December 1991
November 1991
Appellant's murder sentence reduced for youth, intoxication and mob participation; appeal allowed to five years.
Sentencing — Murder committed by mob: balance of aggravating (gruesome burning) and mitigating factors (youth, intoxication, mob pressure, non-initiation); appellate interference where sentence is unreasonable; credit for pre-trial custody
29 November 1991
An agent is entitled to commission where the applicant’s introduction directly led to a voluntary acquisition by the State.
Agency law – mandate to sell – whether mandat e included both immovable property and business (movable assets). Commission – entitlement where State acquisition follows agent’s introduction and negotiations leading to offer and acceptance. Distinction between voluntary sale leading to expropriation and compulsory expropriation without negotiation (John Wilkinson distinguished). Quantum – exclusion of solatium/other components when assessing commission.
29 November 1991
Reported
Developer's reserved extension right is a registrable personal real right but not freely alienable under the old Act.
Sectional Titles — developer's reserved right of extension — real right registrable under Deeds Registries Act s 64(1); classification as personal servitude (not praedial); merger/nulli res sua servit; transitional savings in Sectional Titles Act 1986 s 60 — preservation of old-Act rights but no importation of new-Act alienability (s 25).
29 November 1991
Reported
A lease provision for recovering actual and reasonable maintenance expenses is enforceable if objectively ascertainable and not a mere arbitrary landlord discretion.
Lease law – clause for recovery of 'maintenance and running expenses' – certainty and ascertainability of defined expenses; whether amounts constitute rent; limits on landlord's discretion; contractual construction favouring validity; surcharge clause construed as agreed maximum rate.
29 November 1991
Reported
Owner liable where known-route unrest made petrol‑bomb attack and ensuing passenger injuries reasonably foreseeable.
Motor Vehicle Accidents Act s 8(1) – meaning of "arising out of the driving" – causa sine qua non with common-sense limitation; foreseeability and duty of owner to avoid known danger; liability for injuries from third‑party criminal attacks where driving on a dangerous route precipitated the attack; adequacy of precautions (route closure, communications).
29 November 1991
Reported
A collecting banker may be liable in delict for pure economic loss to a cheque's true owner if negligent collection breaches a legal duty.
Banking law – Collecting banker – Liability in delict for negligent collection of stolen or wrongfully endorsed cheque – Pure economic loss – Lex Aquilia – Duty of care to true owner – Unlawfulness assessed by policy-driven value judgment.
29 November 1991
Death sentences set aside and matter remitted to trial court to hear further mitigation evidence under new sentencing test.
Criminal law – sentencing – retrospective application of new sentencing standards under Criminal Law Amendment Act 107/1990 s19(12)(b)(iii) – criteria for referral to hear further mitigating evidence – relevance, reasonable possibility it would have been led, probable acceptance, potential to produce a different sentence
29 November 1991
Between-hearing admissions cannot be used on the merits; dolus eventualis and mitigation justified replacing death sentences.
Criminal law – admissibility of confessions and between-hearing statements; improper reliance on inadmissible evidence at merits stage; distinction between dolus directus and dolus eventualis; sentencing under amended provisions — death sentence substituted with long determinate terms where mitigating factors present
29 November 1991
Appellate court upheld the appellant's murder conviction, found no trial irregularity, but reduced the effective sentence to four years.
Criminal procedure – section 186 discretion to call witnesses – appellate review of exercise of discretion. Evidence – expert evidence and speculation – no duty to call medical evidence absent foundation. Assessors – permissible scope of assessor questioning – not an irregularity where probing but proper. Credibility – rejection of accused's version and application of reasonable-possibility test implicit in judgment. Criminal law – murder – intention to kill inferred from facts; sentence mitigation for prolonged provocation, personality and rehabilitation
29 November 1991
Pathological jealousy, low intelligence and alcohol-exacerbated impairment justified replacing death sentences with life imprisonment.
Criminal law – Sentencing on appeal against death sentence – appellate balancing of aggravating and mitigating factors – personality disorder, mild mental retardation and alcohol abuse as substantial mitigation – pathological jealousy reducing moral culpability – death sentence substituted by life imprisonment
29 November 1991
Voluntariness of confession must be decided separately; trial-within-trial evidence generally excluded from the main trial.
Criminal procedure – confession – voluntariness and admissibility – trial within the trial (voir dire) to be kept distinct from main trial on guilt; evidence at voir dire not generally used against accused at main trial. Criminal procedure – accused’s election not to testify at main trial – effect where confession, pointing out and prior admissions remain uncontradicted. Evidence – admissions made at bail applications and pointing out of crime scenes – admissibility and weight. Sentencing – application of Criminal Law Amendment Act 107 of 1990 to existing matters; discretion to substitute death sentence with lengthy imprisonment; concurrency and calculation of effective sentence
29 November 1991
Flagrant non‑compliance with appellate rules and inadequate explanations justified refusal of condonation and striking the appeal with costs.
Appellate procedure – condonation – late notice of appeal, late and incomplete record, late power of attorney – explanations must be specific and satisfactory – flagrant non‑compliance and negligence justify refusal of condonation and striking of appeal – costs including two counsel.
29 November 1991
Appeal allowed: five‑year sentence wholly suspended with 300 hours’ community service, balancing mitigation against breach of trust.
Criminal law – Sentencing – Theft by person in position of trust over extended period – Balancing breach of trust and community interests against mitigation (first offender, long service, remorse, restitution, family hardship) – Lawful use of wholly suspended custodial sentence with community‑service condition under s 297(1)
29 November 1991
Appellant's admissions, plea and medical evidence sustain murder conviction via common purpose/dolus eventualis.
Criminal law – Murder – communal stoning – medical evidence of fatal blunt‑force trauma – evidential weight of extra‑judicial statements and plea admissions – credibility of appellant’s denials – common purpose and dolus eventualis established.
28 November 1991
Reported
Statutory adoption deeming does not override a clear testamentary intention to limit succession to blood descendants.
Succession; interpretation of "child" and "descendant" in wills; effect of adoption deeming provisions; Van Tonder precedent; legal fiction versus testamentary intention; fideicommissum to "eldest child".
28 November 1991
A right of first refusal applies only to the specific erven the grantee selects; failure to select prevents its operation.
Contract – Interpretation – Right of first refusal (pre-emption) – Right applies only to specifically identified merx – contextual construction; contrast with clause granting right over all business erven where merx defined.
28 November 1991
Reported
A cession between sister companies was genuine, enabling enforcement of a suretyship against the defendant.
Cession — validity — whether written transfer between sister companies was genuine or sham; burden to prove simulation. Cession v. mandate/agency — legal distinction; cession vests right in cessionary whereas mandate does not. Evidentiary burden — producing written cession shifts burden to opponent to show feigned intention. Precedent — distinction from Skjelbreds Rederi A/S v Hartless where cession aimed to circumvent legal disability. Commercial arrangements between related companies (no consideration, accounting undertakings) do not necessarily invalidate a cession.
28 November 1991
Reported
Whether the applicant's journalistic writings called "increasingly depraved" amounted to defamation or fair comment.
Defamation — meaning in context; reference to journalist's writings versus private character. Fair comment — comment v fact; requirements: opinion, fairness, true factual substratum, public interest. Factual substratum — need not be expressly stated if facts are public/ascertainable (Kemsley v Foot; Roos v Stent). Literary criticism — criticism of published work invites comment; objective test of fairness.
28 November 1991
The appellants' death sentences were replaced by long prison terms under the new sentencing regime due to significant mitigating factors.
Criminal law – Sentencing – Effect of Criminal Law Amendment Act No 107 of 1990 on imposition of death penalty – State bears onus to prove aggravating factors and absence of mitigating factors beyond reasonable doubt – aggravation v. mitigation to be weighed against sentencing objectives; common purpose; uncertainty as to who inflicted fatal wound; concurrent sentences
28 November 1991
Death sentence affirmed for planned, brutal daytime home-invasion murder with no mitigating factors.
Criminal law – Murder – Sentencing – Daylight home invasion, planned and brutal strangulation of a defenceless woman – absence of mitigating factors – death sentence affirmed as only appropriate penalty
28 November 1991
Death sentences confirmed for appellants in premeditated, ruthless home-invasion murders; mitigation insufficient.
Criminal law – Sentencing – Reconsideration of death sentence under Criminal Law Amendment Act 107/1990 s19 – Premeditated, armed home invasions; direct intention to kill; aggravating factors outweigh minimal mitigation (intoxication, personal circumstances); death sentence confirmed
28 November 1991
The court confirmed the applicant's death sentence for premeditated, cold‑blooded murders committed during a robbery of elderly victims.
Criminal law – Murder – Sentence – Whether death sentence is the only proper sentence where murders were premeditated and committed during a robbery of elderly, defenceless victims; prior housebreaking/theft convictions as aggravating; personal circumstances and mitigation; retribution and deterrence in sentencing
28 November 1991
Reported
Application to remit for further evidence under s19(12)(b)(iii) refused; death sentence confirmed.
Criminal law – Transitional provision (s 19 Criminal Law Amendment Act 107/1990) – Reconsideration of death sentences imposed before new test – Criteria for remitting case for further evidence under s 19(12)(b)(iii) – Limits on re-opening concluded trials – Relevance of post‑sentence evidence
28 November 1991
Reported
Court dismissed applicant's claims that respondent's Brillo get-up amounted to passing off or false advertisement.
Passing off — likelihood of confusion/business‑connection deception; overall get‑up vs individual elements; market survey evidence — admissibility and weight; Merchandise Marks Act — assent to use/registered user and locus standi; Trade Practices Act s9 — false or misleading advertisement and objective construction of slogan.
28 November 1991
Reported
A third party's conditional undertaking does not release the respondent from original liability nor compel election by the creditor.
Civil procedure – appealability under s 20(1) – judgment or order "given on appeal" held appealable.* Contract – interpretation – conditional pactum de non petendo; clear wording precluded treating agreement as novation or expromissio.* Contract – third‑party benefit – no stipulatio alteri where no intention or mechanism for acceptance shown.* Remedies – creditor entitled to separate remedies against third party and debtor; no election where remedies are not inconsistent.* Insolvency/procedure – writ challenged for lack of causa; challenge unsuccessful where conditional undertaking lapsed on breach.
28 November 1991
Reported
Whether prescription between two partners remains suspended despite admission or withdrawal of other partners.
Prescription – s.7(1)(b) and definition para (iv) of "person under legal disability" in Prescription Act 18 of 1943 – construction whether suspension of prescription between partners ends upon admission/withdrawal of other partners; debt "arising out of the partnership"; effect of dissolution and reconstitution of partnership on suspension of prescription.
28 November 1991
The appellant’s death sentence for murder during a robbery was set aside and reduced to 15 years due to dolus eventualis and mitigating factors.
Criminal law – murder during robbery – doctrine of common purpose – conviction can be sustained though identity of shooter not proved. Mens rea – distinction between dolus directus and dolus eventualis relevant to sentencing. Sentencing – post-Act 107/1990 appellate review of death sentence: consider sentence afresh, weighing mitigating and aggravating factors. Ballistics and circumstantial evidence – linking firearms to scene supports conviction even if specific shooter not identified
27 November 1991
Appellate court replaced death sentence with life imprisonment where psychiatric evidence left possibility of diminished responsibility.
Criminal Law Amendment Act 107 of 1990 – appellate sentencing powers – weighing aggravating and mitigating factors and considering alternatives to death sentence; Criminal Procedure Act s 79 – psychiatric inquiry – adequacy of report to determine criminal responsibility; Diminished responsibility/mental condition – relevance to sentencing where psychiatric report is inconclusive; Sentencing – substitution of death sentence with life imprisonment where death not the only appropriate punishment
27 November 1991
Reported
The respondent's conditional direct offers to non‑striking employees producing retrospective unequal pay constituted an unfair labour practice.
Labour law – collective bargaining – recognition agreement – duty to bargain in good faith – limits on unilateral action after impasse; Unfair labour practice – direct negotiation with employees by employer – conditional backdating of increases to non‑strikers – unequal retrospective treatment; Whether bad‑faith bargaining by union justified bypassing recognised bargaining agent; Remedies and costs in unfair labour practice proceedings.
27 November 1991
Court convicts both accused of murder and insurance fraud for staging a fatal arson; no mitigation found.
Criminal law — Murder and fraud — Conspiracy/common purpose — Admissibility of co-conspirator statements and acts — Insurance‑fraud scheme — Extenuating circumstances and mandatory sentence.
27 November 1991
Court upheld convictions and death sentences for the appellants who conspired to burn a stranger for insurance proceeds.
Criminal law – Murder – conspiracy to kill for insurance proceeds by deliberately setting a car alight – proof by circumstantial and direct evidence; credibility of witnesses. Criminal procedure – assessment of alternative explanations (accident, joke, intoxication, manipulation) against totality of proved facts. Sentencing – consideration of mitigating and aggravating factors under post-Wet 107/1990 regime; long premeditation, financial motive and extreme cruelty justify death penalty
27 November 1991
Under the amended statutory test the Court set aside death and substituted 25 years’ imprisonment for a brutal multiple‑stab murder.
Criminal law – Sentencing – Reconsideration of pre‑amendment death sentences under s19(12) of amending Act – application of wider s316A test – assessment of aggravating and mitigating factors; motive and intention (dolus eventualis) in savage multiple‑stab homicide
27 November 1991
Refusal to recall complainant after material contradictions deprived the accused of a fair trial; conviction and sentence set aside.
Criminal procedure — rape — duty to disclose previous inconsistent statement — material contradictions in witness evidence — refusal to recall witness for further cross‑examination constitutes material irregularity affecting fairness of trial — reliance on S v Xaba
27 November 1991
Whether police killing during a vehicle pursuit was lawful under s 49(2) or constituted actionable negligence.
Criminal procedure – s 49(2) Criminal Procedure Act – requirements for non-punishable killing during arrest or attempted arrest – reasonable suspicion and knowledge of arrest attempt by accused – scope of police authority to use lethal force in vehicle pursuits; Civil liability – negligence by police in firing at vehicle wheels during pursuit – damages for wrongful death.
26 November 1991
Reported
Conveyance vehicles collecting farmers' milk are not "used directly" in manufacture or primary processing for tax allowances.
Tax law – Income Tax Act s 12(1)(a), s 12(2)(a): "used directly" in manufacture – pasteurisation a process of manufacture but cooling is preservation not manufacture – conveyance by tankers/trucks ancillary, not direct use. s 27(2)(d)/(e): agricultural co-operative allowances – plant "used directly" for storing members' products or subjecting to a primary process – tankers/trucks neither store nor directly perform primary processing.
26 November 1991
The appellant’s death sentence was affirmed because aggravating factors outweighed any mitigating circumstances.
Criminal law – re‑sentencing under Criminal Law Amendment Act (s19/ amended s277) – death penalty – assessing mitigation (youth, prior record, intoxication) versus aggravation (elderly victims, gratuitous violence, killings during robbery, lack of remorse) – intoxication evidence rejected
26 November 1991
Reported
Whether the Lloyds premium levy applies to non‑Lloyds policies and whether mistake of law bars restitution.
Insurance law - interpretation of s 60(1)(f) of Insurance Act: 2.5% levy applies to Lloyds-underwritten business only; policies placed under s 60(2) do not attract the tax. Restitution/condictio indebiti - mistake of law: mistake of law is not automatically a bar to recovery; mistake of law and mistake of fact stand on the same footing provided the error is excusable. Onus: plaintiff bears burden to prove excusability. Statutory interpretation: penal/pecuniary burdens construed in favour of the subject.
26 November 1991
Leave to appeal sentence granted because, despite severity justified by crime and record, a reasonable prospect of appellate relief exists.
Criminal law – Sentence – Leave to appeal against heavy custodial sentence – Seriousness of robbery with aggravating circumstances and appellant’s bad record justify heavy sentence, but reasonable prospect of success on appeal (including possible concurrency with existing sentence) warrants leave to appeal.
25 November 1991
An 18-year-old offender’s youth was mitigating; the death sentence was substituted with life imprisonment.
Criminal law – sentencing on murder – reconsideration under amended s 277/art 19(12) – mitigating factors: psychopathy, unhappy childhood, youth – psychopathy not mitigating where conduct was calculated – youth may mitigate; death sentence substituted with life imprisonment.
25 November 1991
Death sentence affirmed for calculated close-range robbery-murder given brutal conduct, serious prior record, and no mitigation.
Criminal law – Murder – Close-range, calculated shooting during robbery – Dolus directus. Sentencing – Aggravating factors: motive of robbery, brutal conduct, serious prior convictions, offences committed on parole. Mitigation rejected – alleged intoxication, illiteracy and deprived upbringing insufficient. Review under s19 Act 107 of 1990 – confirmation of death sentence appropriate
25 November 1991
Appellate court upholds a five-year sentence for repeated cheque fraud and insolvency-related offences; sentencing discretion was properly exercised.
Criminal law – Sentencing – Multiple counts of cheque fraud and statutory insolvency offences – Sentencing discretion and deference on appeal; deterrence and protection of community as dominant sentencing considerations. Sentencing – Prior convictions and suspended sentences – timing of prior imprisonment and possible activation of suspended sentence considered but did not preclude further imprisonment
25 November 1991
Whether the applicant’s death sentence was appropriate given reasonable doubt about deliberate shooting and condonation for late appeal.
Criminal procedure – condonation for late filing of notice of appeal – omission to serve one registrar – prompt correction, no prejudice, condonation granted. Criminal procedure – condonation for late filing of heads of argument – no formal application, substantial delay, prejudice to State – condonation refused. Evidence – single eyewitness – distinction between credibility and reliability – poor lighting, confined space and rapid events may vitiate objective reliability. Sentence – death penalty – appropriateness where reasonable possibility exists of different causal account; statutory scheme restricts death sentences; substitution with long imprisonment permissible
25 November 1991
Conviction reduced to culpable homicide: State failed to prove dolus eventualis beyond reasonable doubt.
Criminal law – dolus eventualis – subjective foresight must be proved beyond reasonable doubt; inference must be the only reasonable one – expert ballistic evidence not dispositive of accused’s subjective foresight – post-offence conduct not determinative – murder conviction substituted with culpable homicide.
22 November 1991
Reported
Designation under s 3(2)(a)(ii) valid where prior proclamation and compensation established acquisition of road-use; appeal dismissed.
Public roads / national roads – proclamation and expropriatory effect – whether proclamation acquires "use" (road-rights/servitude). National Roads Act 1971 s 3(2)(a)(ii) – designation where use was acquired and compensation paid from National Road Fund. Onus in challenge to administrative designation – applicant must prove invalidity and may not shift burden to Minister to prove subjective opinion. Deeds Registries Act – transfers effected pursuant to s 31(4)(a) certificate valid when statutory designation in place.
22 November 1991
Court rejected duress defence and upheld death sentence for a premeditated, brutal prison murder; gang culture not mitigating.
Criminal law – Murder in prison – Strangulation and multiple stab wounds – Premeditation and cruelty as aggravating factors. Defence of necessity/duress – requirements and credibility assessment – unsupported claim of gang order rejected. Sentencing – prison subculture not mitigating absent evidentiary foundation that it reduced moral blameworthiness. Death penalty – appropriate where offence is deliberate, brutal, and offender poses continuing danger
22 November 1991
The appellant’s challenge to credibility and sentence failed; conviction and death sentence for deliberate murder affirmed.
Criminal law – Murder – Appeal against conviction and sentence – Appellate review of credibility findings; no misdirection where trial court’s acceptance of eyewitnesses was supported by evidence; sentence of death upheld where killing was deliberate, callous, firearm used, and aggravating factors (including prior violent convictions) overwhelmingly outweighed mitigation.
21 November 1991
Appeal dismissed: purchaser and corroborative evidence sustained conviction for selling heroin; alibi and sentence not upheld.
Criminal law – drugs – conviction for sale of heroin based on purchasers' and co‑accused evidence; accomplice evidence and contradictions considered but not fatal; alibi rejected; sentence confirmed
21 November 1991
Reported
Municipal park reservations for whites were reviewable; council’s exercise of discretion was not bona fide and was set aside.
Administrative law – review of municipal decision – Reservation of Separate Amenities Act 49 of 1953 – exercise of statutory discretion reviewable if mala fide, for improper purpose or without proper consideration; locus standi – Dalrymple principle for taxpayer; direct interest and injury to dignitas confer standing; Plascon‑Evans test for disputed facts.
20 November 1991
A voluntary, corroborated confession and supporting evidence upheld a murder conviction and death sentence; appeal dismissed.
Criminal law – admissibility of confession – voluntariness – allegations of torture and coercion. Murder – killing of police officer in planned armed ambush – corroboration of confession. Sentencing – aggravating and mitigating circumstances – death penalty upheld
19 November 1991