background image

Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa

The Supreme Court of Appeal is, except in respect of certain labour and competition matters, the second highest court in South Africa. In terms of the Constitution, it is purely an appeal court and may decide only appeals and issues connected with appeals. (Banner image by Ben Bezuidenhout).
Physical address
Cnr Mirriam Makeba & President Brand Streets, Bloemfontein, Free State, 9301
187 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Labels
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
187 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
December 1994
Reported
An innocent contractor may enforce unpaid interim architect certificates after cancelling for the employer's breach.
Building contracts – interim architect certificates – nature and effect: certificates create accrued debts enforceable when unpaid though not conclusive on quality/value; Distinguishing Thomas Construction: enforcement depends on which party caused cancellation; Clause 23 (contractor's determination) preserves accrued rights and does not render prior interim certificates dependent on executory performance; innocent contractor who cancels for employer's breach may sue on prior interim certificates; Suretyship/mortgage bond claims based on ceded architect certificates enforceable.
1 December 1994
November 1994
Reported
An employer must consult in good faith over retrenchment but may withhold confidential information reasonably.
Labour law – retrenchment – duty of prior consultation arises when retrenchment is contemplated – consultation in good faith – scope depends on circumstances – employer may withhold trade secrets or confidential information and may require confidentiality undertakings – refusal to disclose not automatically unfair.
30 November 1994
Reported
Whether delivery of a share certificate is required for valid cession of shares; court held it is not, ordering rectification under s115.
Companies law – cession of shares – whether delivery of share certificate is required for valid cession – delivery rule is evidential not substantive; rectification of members register (s115) ordered; prescription and cancellation defences considered.
30 November 1994
Reported
The applicant’s association constituted a statutory charitable trust under the 1988 Act, empowering the Master to act.
Trusts – Charitable trust – Requirement of ascertainable trust res – Audited financial statements and admissible extrinsic evidence may identify trust property; Trust Property Control Act 57 of 1988 – Definition of "trust" and "trust instrument" – written notarial deed qualifies; statutory phrase "by virtue of" to be construed broadly; Master’s investigatory powers under s.16(2) of the 1988 Act – valid exercise.
30 November 1994
Reported
The respondent bank must prove sec 79 protection; sec 79 covers same-bank branches and 'not transferable' crossed cheques.
Bills of Exchange Act s 79 – statutory protection for bankers – must be interpreted as statute not merely as implied contractual term; banker bears onus to prove payment was in good faith and without negligence. Crossed cheques – collecting and paying banker may be branches of same bank; s 79 protection still available. Non-transferable crossed cheques – s 79 applies despite potential anomalies; negligence limits protection.
30 November 1994
Reported
Applicant failed to establish statutory entitlement to immediate scheme admission; fresh evidence on appeal was refused and appeal dismissed.
Medical Schemes Act s20(1)(f) – admission without waiting period – continuous two‑year membership or dependant status – evidentiary weight of scheme membership certificates. Interpretation – phrase "necessitated by his changing employment" (construction left open where unnecessary). Civil procedure – reception of further evidence on appeal – requirements that evidence be weighty, material, presumably true and practically conclusive. Contract and estoppel claims to enforce scheme admission not established.
30 November 1994
Convictions for ten murders upheld; duress rejected and death sentences postponed for constitutional consideration.
Criminal law – murder – ambush killing of minibus passengers – evidence and confession – rejection of duress defence; corroboration by pointing out of weapons and ballistic evidence. Criminal procedure – alibi and credibility – false alibi, contradictions and improbabilities. Sentencing – death penalty – mitigating factors (political unrest, youth, first offender) insufficient where killings were indiscriminate and callous; death sentence imposed but appeals on sentence postponed for constitutional review.
30 November 1994
Appeal against murder convictions dismissed; death‑sentence appeals deferred pending Constitutional Court ruling.
Criminal law – Murder – premeditated, co‑ordinated killing of police officers – evidence of planning, admissions and jail conversations establishing joint participation. Evidence – admissions in presence of co‑accused and silence of others as probative of joint liability; credibility assessment of accomplice witnesses. Sentencing – aggravating factors (premeditation, motive of revenge/obstruction of duty) justify death sentence absent substantial mitigation. Constitutional procedure – consideration of death sentence appeals deferred pending Constitutional Court determination on validity of death penalty.
30 November 1994
Whether cumulative circumstantial evidence and an accused’s silence justified convicting him as a co-perpetrator and imposing death.
Criminal law – murder – circumstantial evidence – cumulative effect of antecedent and subsequent facts; accomplice liability by supply of weapon and information; adverse inferences from accused's silence where crucial facts lie peculiarly within his knowledge; sentencing – death penalty for deliberate, premeditated political assassination.
30 November 1994
Reported
Repeal of the statutory lodging requirement did not destroy accrued rights; special leave to lodge the claim out of time was granted.
Repeal and retrospectivity; procedural versus substantive time‑bar provisions; Interpretation Act s12(2) preservation of accrued rights and remedies; special leave to lodge claims out of time under statutory proviso; transfer of rights and obligations to statutory successor.
30 November 1994
Reported
Whether interest receipts are "derived from farming operations" under s 26(1) and the First Schedule.
Income tax — s 26(1) and First Schedule — scope of "income derived from farming operations" — requirement of direct connection. Revenue v capital — retention interest as part of sale proceeds (revenue); interest on compensation as interest on capital. Sugar industry payments — retention interest under payment scheme; staged compensation for loss of transport/mill-site rights. Statutory interpretation — par 12(1) and par 12(3) First Schedule; strict construction of farmer-specific deductions.
29 November 1994
Reported
Whether a foreign monetary judgment under appeal is final and enforceable in South Africa and whether provisional sentence is appropriate.
• Private international law – enforcement of foreign money judgments – requirement of finality – effect of pending appeal in country of rendition. • Civil procedure – provisional sentence on foreign judgment – liquidity and consequence of refusal. • Discretion to stay enforcement proceedings pending foreign appeal – relevant factors (pending appeal, absence of supersedeas bond, size of award, public policy). • Public policy – enforceability of foreign punitive/exemplary damages left undecided.
29 November 1994
Reported
Section 20 bars claims for loss of earning capacity but not delictual solatium under the 1976 Act.
Military Pensions Act 1976 — s 20 — effect on delictual claims arising from disablement; distinction between patrimonial loss (loss of earning capacity) and solatium; statutory pension excludes claim for loss of earnings but not for pain and suffering; Casely (War Pensions) not directly applicable to 1976 Act.
29 November 1994
Appellant's confessions admissible but insufficient to prove sodomy or murder; convictions reduced to attempted offences.
Confessions – admissibility and weight; exculpatory versus inculpatory portions; duress and alibi defenses – requirements and proof; common purpose and individual conduct; distinguishing sodomy (penetration) from indecent assault; causation and timing in murder—when attempted murder only can be proved.
29 November 1994
Appellants' murder convictions upheld, but death sentences set aside for concurrent 20-year terms due to mitigating factors.
Criminal law – murder – common purpose – convictions supported by credible eyewitness and corroborating evidence including active participation and tying/burning victims.* Sentencing – death penalty – appellate discretion – necessity to weigh mitigating circumstances (youth, background, lack of relevant antecedents, cultural context); State must rebut plausible mitigating factors.* Evidence – credibility of child and traumatized witnesses and corroboration by circumstances and other testimony.
29 November 1994
Circumstantial evidence and common purpose supported murder convictions; death sentences partly substituted and murder appeals deferred.
Criminal law – circumstantial evidence and common purpose in murder; admissibility of extra-judicial statements (s 219A); right to legal representation; sentencing – appropriateness and substitution of death penalty; retrial following set-aside convictions (s 324).
29 November 1994
Confession and corroborated circumstantial evidence upheld convictions; duplicative housebreaking counts set aside; death sentence deferred for review.
Criminal law – confession admissibility and reliability; circumstantial evidence; single witness corroboration; dolus eventualis versus dolus directus; duplication of charges – housebreaking with intent and robbery; sentencing (death sentence deferred for constitutional review).
29 November 1994
Appellants' confessions were admissible; convictions upheld and death sentences deferred pending constitutional review.
Criminal procedure – admissibility of confessions – s 217(1) Criminal Procedure Act – voluntariness, undue influence and burden on defence; use of police as interpreters does not automatically taint statements; evidence (identification, fingerprint, admissions) supporting gang membership and convictions; sentencing – death penalty held appropriate on facts but deferred pending constitutional review.
28 November 1994
Sentence set aside and remitted because trial court failed to consider correctional supervision as a sentencing option.
Criminal law — Sentencing — Correctional supervision (s 276(1)(h) read with s 276A) — Applicability in serious offences; appellate interference where trial court failed to consider available sentencing option; substitution of sentence after legislative amendment.
28 November 1994
Whether appellants were proved to share common purpose in a contract killing and whether death sentence was appropriate.
Criminal law – murder – common purpose and accomplice liability – confessions and pointings-out corroborated by possession and independent witness evidence. Evidence – evaluation of witness credibility; single-witness argument rejected where other incriminating evidence exists. Sentence – contract (hired) murder attracts exceptional seriousness; death sentence appropriate absent exceptional mitigation; appeal on sentence postponed pending Constitutional Court consideration of death penalty.
25 November 1994
Admission and medical evidence supported a dolus eventualis murder conviction; robbery sentences were reduced, death-penalty appeal deferred.
Criminal law – murder – liability established by admissions corroborated by post-mortem evidence – dolus eventualis. Sentencing – death penalty – appropriateness for particularly cruel murder; constitutional challenge requires deferral to Constitutional Court. Sentencing – robbery with aggravating circumstances – exclusion of victims’ deaths as additional aggravation to avoid double-counting where killings were not foreseen or participated in by all accused. Appellate adjustment of sentences according to roles, youth, priors and mitigation.
25 November 1994
Court upholds convictions for contract murder and defers sentence appeals pending constitutional ruling on death penalty.
Criminal law – murder – contract killing – common purpose liability – travel to victim’s place, premeditation and payment for murder established. Evidence – unsworn statement/allegation of coercion – weight and credibility; contradicted by eyewitness evidence and rejected. Sentencing – contract murders attract the death sentence absent exceptional circumstances. Procedural – appeals against sentences postponed pending constitutional resolution on capital punishment.
24 November 1994
Appeal against murder conviction dismissed; death sentence set aside and replaced by 25 years imprisonment.
Criminal law – admissibility of confessions – interpreter absent from evidence – issue left undecided where conviction sustainable without confession. Criminal procedure – voir dire (binne-verhoor) – pointing-out and admissions – no requirement for separate voir dire where defence does not insist and dispute is factual. Evidence – cumulative effect of pointing-out, possession of stolen property and weapon, and accused’s silence can sustain conviction. Sentencing – death penalty – appellate reduction where sentence not the only appropriate punishment; substitution with long-term imprisonment.
24 November 1994
Failure to disclose material discrepancies between police statements and trial testimony undermines identification and vitiates conviction.
Criminal procedure – Prosecution duty to disclose witness’ police statements – Material deviations between police statements and trial testimony – Failure to disclose is an irregularity affecting cross-examination and identification evidence. Criminal law – Identification – Undisclosed inconsistencies in identification evidence may render conviction unsafe.
24 November 1994
Whether a confession and eyewitness evidence sustain murder convictions and whether death sentences should be finalized pending constitutional review.
Criminal law — Murder — Conviction based on confession and circumstantial evidence; admissibility of confession after withinverhoor. Evidence — Weight of eyewitness neighbour testimony versus appellant's alibi; limited probative value of some forensic matches. Sentence — Death penalty: aggravating/mitigating factors and pending constitutional challenge.
24 November 1994
Reported
The appellant's profit from sale of flats was capital, not taxable revenue, as no change to trading intention occurred.
Taxation – Capital v revenue – Whether profit on sale of sectional-title units constitutes taxable income or capital gain – Importance of taxpayer's intention at acquisition and circumstances of sale. Taxation – Change of intention – Whether conversion to sectional title or related-company rescue establishes trading stock or profit-making scheme. Property law – Sectional title conversion – advisory/precautionary conversion not necessarily evidence of trading. Evidence – directors' activities and isolated speculative projects considered but insufficient to convert investment into stock-in-trade.
23 November 1994
State liable for abduction and continued unlawful detention; void judicial acts did not break causation.
State liability — unlawful abduction by non‑state actors acting on NIS instruction — agents of the State; jurisdiction — trial following abduction void; causation — void judicial acts do not break chain of legal causation; damages for continued unlawful detention.
22 November 1994
Reported
Voluntary consent to accompany police negates abduction-based jurisdictional bar; brutal, deliberate murders justified death sentence pending constitutional review.
Criminal law — Jurisdiction — Alleged abduction from independent territory — Consent to accompany police — Ebrahim and Wellem considered; Wellem's extension of Ebrahim rejected — Formal extradition unnecessary where consent is voluntary and no unlawful state conduct. Sentencing — Murders extremely brutal and depraved; death sentence appropriate in principle but finalisation adjourned pending constitutional review.
22 November 1994
Death sentence upheld as appropriate for premeditated, brutal murder; appeal on sentence adjourned pending Constitutional Court review.
Criminal law – Murder and robbery with aggravating circumstances – premeditated, brutal killing to avoid detection – prime mover/instigator increases moral blameworthiness. Sentencing – Death sentence – aggravating factors (planning, brutality, former policeman’s conduct) outweigh mitigating factors; S v Ngcobo distinguishable. Procedural – Finalisation of capital-sentence appeal adjourned pending Constitutional Court determination of death penalty constitutionality.
22 November 1994
Appeals against murder convictions dismissed; death-sentence appeals postponed pending Constitutional Court decision on capital punishment.
Criminal law – murder – proof of intent – close-range shotgun wound and medical evidence rebutting accidental discharge; dolus directus and dolus eventualis. Criminal law – common purpose – conviction of co-participant for murder on basis of joint enterprise and active participation. Evidence – confessions – admissibility upheld at trial; credibility of accused’s oral testimony assessed and rejected. Sentencing – aggravating circumstances justify death sentence on facts, but execution deferred pending Constitutional Court ruling on capital punishment.
22 November 1994
Conviction upheld; determination of appeals against death sentences postponed pending Constitutional Court ruling on constitutionality.
Criminal law – Murder in prison cell – Eyewitness and medical evidence supporting dolus directus – Defence of duress/compulsion rejected as not reasonably possibly true – Sentencing triad applied – Death penalty considered appropriate but confirmation postponed pending Constitutional Court ruling on constitutionality of confirmations by Appellate Division.
21 November 1994
Reported
Divisible import/clearing obligations allow pro rata payment where theft causes non‑self‑created supervening impossibility.
Contract — import/clearing/carriage contract — divisibility of performance — separate operations (forwarding, degrouping, customs clearance, local carriage) allow pro rata recovery on partial performance. Supervening impossibility — theft as casus fortuitus — not self‑created where delay did not causally produce loss. Risk allocation — clearing agent/depositary not insurer absent negligence or express allocation of risk. Exceptio non adimpleti contractus — inapplicable where performance is divisible.
18 November 1994
Reported
The respondent's erroneous subdivision approval did not give the applicant a delictual claim for pure economic loss.
Town-planning/statutory powers – negligence – pure economic loss – wrongfulness and legal duty – role of statutory appeal/review procedure – quasi-judicial v administrative classification not decisive.
18 November 1994
Reported
Deeming provision for dismissal on prolonged unauthorised absence operates automatically; no prior hearing or reviewable decision required.
Administrative law – statutory deeming provision – article 72 Education Act: automatic dismissal on >30 days absence without permission – not a discretionary administrative decision subject to audi rule. Procedural fairness – audi alteram partem not required before operation of objective deeming provision. Article 72(2) – discretionary power to reinstate upon re‑reporting; absence of exercise of discretion does not convert deeming into reviewable act.
18 November 1994
Death sentence found appropriate for robbery-murder with decapitation; appeal postponed pending Constitutional Court decision.
• Criminal law — Murder during robbery — dolus directus inferred from totality of evidence. • Sentencing — Aggravating factors: robbery motive, deception, vulnerability of victim, mutilation, lack of remorse. • Evidentiary weight — Extra‑curial admissions and letter corroborating motive and intent; partial acceptance/rejection of inconsistent statements. • Mitigation — Personality disorder and limited rehabilitation prospects insufficient to outweigh aggravation. • Procedural — Appeal against death sentence postponed pending Constitutional Court decision on validity of capital punishment.
18 November 1994
Whether the State proved the appellant’s identity and voluntariness of his confession; death sentence deferred.
Criminal law – identity – circumstantial evidence – clothing change, flight, items found, wounds and admissions used to prove identity beyond reasonable doubt. Criminal procedure – confession – admissibility and voluntariness under s 217(1)(b)(ii) of the Criminal Procedure Act. Evidence – reliability of eyewitness identification and police showings – contradictions and timing of discoveries considered but cumulative evidence upheld. Sentencing – death penalty – confirmation deferred pending constitutional uncertainty (Makwanyane principle).
17 November 1994
Whether conflicting pre-trial statements and medical evidence support a murder conviction and whether death sentence is proportionate.
Criminal law – confession and unsworn statements – weight to be attached to section 112 statement conflicting with an unsworn magistrate statement; reliability and effect of untested admissions. Evidence – medical and circumstantial evidence – multiple severe cranial injuries supporting direct intent to kill (dolus directus). Sentencing – death sentence review – mitigation (youth and first‑offender) may render death disproportionate despite brutality of offence. Issue of premeditation – absence of sufficient evidence to establish prior planning.
17 November 1994
Appellants' convictions upheld on reliable eyewitness identification; death sentences postponed pending Constitutional Court ruling.
Criminal law – Murder – Eyewitness identification and corroboration – close‑range daylight observation and subsequent discovery of blood‑stained weapons supported conviction. Criminal law – Sentencing – Death penalty – aggravating factors (premeditation, extreme brutality, gang leadership, extensive prior convictions) outweighing mitigation; sentencing deferred pending constitutional review of capital punishment.
17 November 1994
Reported
A cheque paid by the respondent despite a drawer's countermand extinguishes the applicant's underlying debt.
Bills of exchange – cheque – countermand of payment – effect of bank's unauthorized payment on underlying debt between drawer and payee – payment by bank to holder extinguishes antecedent debt. Enrichment – condictio sine causa – when payee is not enriched because payment extinguished original claim. Remedies – bank negligent in paying; primary restitution claim lies against drawer (unjustified enrichment/quasi negotiorum gestio). Interpretation and application of Bills of Exchange Act provisions (payment in due course, dishonour, presentment).
11 November 1994
Reported
Participation in illegal industrial action is relevant but does not automatically bar reinstatement; parity and equity matter.
Labour law – Unfair dismissal – Remedy – Reinstatement versus compensation – Role of employees' participation in illegal industrial action when deciding remedy; parity principle and selective dismissal; doctrine of unclean hands relevant but not automatically disqualifying; industrial court's wide discretion under s.46(9).
11 November 1994
Whether a co-perpetrator was liable for murder under common purpose/dolus eventualis despite claiming no intent to kill.
Criminal law – Common purpose and dolus eventualis – co-perpetrator guilty of murder where confession and conduct show participation in or foresight of lethal violence. Evidentiary weight of pre-trial confession conflicting with later testimony – confession may fatally undermine credibility. Sentencing – death penalty reserved for exceptionally brutal, premeditated attacks; mitigation may warrant lengthy imprisonment instead.
11 November 1994
Appeal allowed and magistrate’s sentence for indecent assault on an 8‑year‑old replaced with custodial and suspended terms.
Criminal law – sentencing – appellate review of sentence – misdirection by reliance on prior dicta – correctional supervision as sentencing option (s 276A/Act 8 of 1959) – sentencing for sexual offences against young, vulnerable children – balance between denunciation, deterrence and offender's personal circumstances.
8 November 1994
Appellate court set aside imprisonment sentence for incest, ordering resentencing after a s 276A(1) report due to misdirected sentencing discretion.
Criminal law – Sentencing – Incest (competent verdict on rape) – Appropriate sentencing considerations: victim's age; degree of coercion or corruption; harm caused; family disruption; offender’s personal factors; correctional supervision vs imprisonment – Appellate interference where sentencing discretion misdirected. Criminal procedure – s 276A(1) reports – requirement and role before imposition of correctional supervision.
8 November 1994
October 1994
Reported
Whether a contractual 15% "selling commission" payable to an intermediary qualified as marketing expenditure directly incurred for export orders under s 11bis.
Tax — s 11bis — exporter and export trade — whether goods produced were produced for and actually exported despite processing by purchaser; marketing allowance — s 11bis(4)(f) — whether payment to intermediary constituted marketing expenditure "incurred directly" for commission or remuneration for procurement of export orders; character of contractual relationship (sale vs agency) — substance over form; onus on taxpayer to prove directness and nature of expenditure.
3 October 1994
Whether corrective supervision may be imposed retrospectively and the Appellate Division’s competence to substitute such a sentence.
Criminal law – Sentencing – Availability and retrospective application of a newly introduced sentencing option (corrective supervision) – Appellate competence to impose new sentence options after prior valid exercise of discretion by lower appellate court – s276A(3) remedy for Commissioner of Correctional Services.
3 October 1994
September 1994
Reported
Whether South African Copyright Act 1978 (with later notices) governs subsistence of U.S.-made drawings and whether two engineering drawings were original and infringed.
• Copyright — foreign-origin artistic works — applicability of South African Copyright Act 98 of 1978 and ministerial notices to works made abroad prior to 1979 — repealed proclamations do not revive to govern subsistence once replaced by later notices. • Copyright — originality — engineering drawings: originality requires author’s own skill or labour, not inventive novelty; "similar to" legends do not preclude originality. • Infringement — reproduction and transmission (telefax) of drawings to third parties for manufacture constituted infringement. • Interim relief — overbroad interlocutory restraint beyond specific claim may be set aside; court entitled to grant interdict where undertaking is equivocal.
30 September 1994
Reported
Drilling new boreholes and installing pumping equipment is an improvement, not a deductible repair under section 11(d).
Tax — Income Tax Act s11(d) — deductions for "repairs of property" — ordinary grammatical meaning of "repairs". Distinction between repair and improvement — expenditure creating new or improved facilities not deductible under s11(d). Evidence — need to prove existing asset was defective to treat replacement as repair. Authorities — reliance on prior ITC decision distinguishing new borehole drilling as non-repair.
30 September 1994
Reported
Pre-1991 Labour Relations Act did not govern limited-duration offshore employment; 1991 amendment not retrospective.
Labour law – territorial scope – industrial council jurisdiction limited to undertakings carried on within registered area; offshore/continental shelf work not governed by unamended Labour Relations Act; 1991 amendment to s 2(1) covers continental shelf but is not retrospective by virtue of s 13; s 7 Territorial Waters Act does not render labour legislation extra-territorial.
30 September 1994
Reported
The amending Act redefining 'associated ship' is not retrospective; arrest was set aside and appeal dismissed.
Admiralty law — Associated ship — Definition amended by Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Amendment Act 87 of 1992 — Retrospectivity — Presumption against retrospective operation of statutes — Security arrest of associated ship — Procedural v substantive statute — Impact on vested rights and third parties.
30 September 1994
Reported
A bank’s negligent, misleading report induced the applicant’s loss; damages awarded in US dollars.
Delict – negligent misstatement – bank report – banker’s duty to third-party financiers – reliance and causation. Bank law – bank reports to other banks – foreseeability of reliance and unlawfulness. Damages – foreign-currency award – competence to express damages in US dollars. Interest – refusal of pre-judgment interest on unliquidated delictual claim.
30 September 1994