background image

Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa

The Supreme Court of Appeal is, except in respect of certain labour and competition matters, the second highest court in South Africa. In terms of the Constitution, it is purely an appeal court and may decide only appeals and issues connected with appeals. (Banner image by Ben Bezuidenhout).
Physical address
Cnr Mirriam Makeba & President Brand Streets, Bloemfontein, Free State, 9301
17 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Labels
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
17 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
December 2014
A homeowners’ association clearance condition is a real right binding successors, including liquidators; levies are not "tax".
Land law – Restrictive title conditions – Clearance certificate for transfer – Real right binding successors (including liquidators); Insolvency law – Levies and penalties payable to homeowners’ associations – Not "tax" under s 89(5) of the Insolvency Act; Enforcement of homeowners’ association rights against insolvent owners and their liquidators.
12 December 2014
Reported
Collected VAT does not constitute trust property of SARS; misappropriation is addressed by statutory offences, not common‑law theft.
Criminal law; Value‑Added Tax — whether misappropriated collected VAT constitutes property of SARS for common‑law theft; statutory scheme under VAT Act creates debtor‑creditor relationship not trust; courts should not create new criminal liability where legislature provided specific sanctions; nullum crimen, nulla poena sine praevia lege poenali.
12 December 2014
Reported
Whether an unmarried father acquired parental rights under s21(1)(b), rendering the child’s removal without consent wrongful.
Children’s Act s 21(1)(b) – acquisition of parental responsibilities by unmarried father – meaning of "contribute(s)" and "for a reasonable period" – factual, value‑judgment enquiry; contributions need not be material or quantified. Hague Convention Article 3 – wrongful removal where rights of custody exist and are being exercised; temporary absence does not negate exercise of custody. Admissibility – evidence post‑dating the relevant date of removal is irrelevant to the statutory question.
12 December 2014
Reported
A title-registered clearance embargo is a real right that binds trustees and the Master in insolvency.
Property — title condition — transfer embargo requiring homeowners association clearance — real right or personal right — test: intention to bind successors and subtraction from dominium (restriction of ius disponendi) — embargo held real and binding on Master/trustees; amounts for clearance form costs of realisation under s89 Insolvency Act — analogous to statutory municipal/sectional-title embargoes.
12 December 2014
Ballistic evidence without a proven chain of custody cannot sustain a murder conviction against the appellant.
Criminal law – Circumstantial evidence – Chain of custody for ballistic exhibits – Ballistics report unreliable where exhibit numbers and registers do not match; prosecution must prove recovery, preservation and conveyance of exhibits. Procedural law – Special leave to appeal required following repeal of old Supreme Court Act. Evidence – Where ballistic linkage fails, proven facts must exclude all reasonable inferences except guilt per R v Blom.
11 December 2014
Reported
Gist of reasons under s33(2) suffices; undisclosed pre-existing reasons vitiate closure; union consultation not required.
• Education law – school closure under s 33 Schools Act – statutory notice-and-comment procedure and requirement to inform governing body of reasons – gist of reasons sufficient for meaningful representations. • Administrative law – PAJA and principle of legality – classification of action unnecessary where statutory procedural requirements not complied with. • Procedural fairness – additional reasons emerging during consultation may be relied upon; pre-existing undisclosed material reasons vitiate decision. • Trade unions – no separate statutory duty to consult SADTU under s 33(2). • Rationality – closure decisions rationally connected to legitimate educational and resource objectives.
9 December 2014
Reported
Whether the applicant may interdict its bank from honouring counter‑guarantees given non‑compliant demands and an exclusive jurisdiction clause.
Bank guarantees – on‑demand guarantees and counter‑guarantees – independence from underlying contract – strict compliance by beneficiary with guarantee wording required; choice‑of‑law/exclusive jurisdiction clause in a counter‑guarantee may oust local jurisdiction; interdict against bank payment available only in exceptional cases; mandator has locus to enforce implied term in mandate.
3 December 2014
Appeal dismissed: complainant’s corroborated evidence and trial court credibility findings upheld convictions.
Criminal law – evaluation of evidence – single witness corroboration – consent – inherent improbability of accused’s version – deference to trial court credibility findings (S v Chabalala; R v Mlambo; S v Phallo; S v Pistorius).
1 December 2014
Reported
Attempted murder convictions set aside where violence was within robbery's bounds and intent to kill was not proven.
Criminal law – duplication of convictions – robbery with aggravating circumstances and attempted murder arising from same facts – Moloto test (excessive force endangering life and intention to kill). Evidence – nature and degree of injuries; inference of intimidation versus intent to kill. Sentencing – application of minimum sentences under s 51(2); concurrency and cumulative effect considered.
1 December 2014
Reported
Purposive claim construction and evidence of commercial manufacture defeated a revocation for alleged patent inutility.
Patents — revocation for inutility (s 61(1)(d)) — purposive construction of claims — meaning of 'dispersed' and 'dissolved' as understood by skilled addressee — burden on challenger to prove inutility on balance of probabilities — commercial manufacture and patentee expert evidence relevant to utility.
1 December 2014
Reported
Civil contempt requires proof of a wilful personal breach; courts must not imprison municipal officials not personally responsible.
Civil contempt — requisites: order; service/notice; non-compliance; wilfulness and mala fides — proof beyond reasonable doubt. Suspended committal — activation requires proof of wilful breach beyond reasonable doubt. Public officials — only personally responsible officials may be committed for contempt; municipal manager is the accountable officer for municipal compliance. Structural/interdictory relief against State — courts should provide ongoing supervisory remedies (special masters/monitors); contempt is a blunt instrument. Consent committals — of limited value unless factual basis and reasons are recorded.
1 December 2014
Reported
Liquidators cannot use s 80 MPRA to lodge late objections where the company acquiesced in or benefited from an inflated valuation.
Municipal Property Rates Act – valuation rolls – adjustments by s 55 (objections) or s 78 (supplementary valuations) – s 80 condonation of time limits – liquidator stands in shoes of company and takes rights subject to defences – acquiescence and simulated inflated purchase price preclude condonation.
1 December 2014
Prosecutors are not immune under s42 for malicious prosecutions; discrete charges must be assessed separately and damages reduced accordingly.
Malicious prosecution – requirement of reasonable and probable cause and malice; assessment per discrete charge. Prosecuting Authority – limits of s 42 NPA Act immunity; does not protect malicious or reckless prosecutions; prosecutor must act within authority and take reasonable precautions. Quantum of damages – need to account for charges properly instituted; claimant must prove legal costs claimed.
1 December 2014
Reported
Business rescue does not automatically discharge sureties’ liabilities once final judgments have fixed those liabilities; appeal dismissed.
Companies Act – business rescue (ss128–154) – effect on suretyship; suretyship clauses – waiver of excussion and creditor’s right to pursue sureties despite compromises; section 154 – limits creditor’s ability to sue company but does not necessarily extinguish underlying debt; stay of execution – discretionary relief refused.
1 December 2014
Reported
Reserving road lanes to buses is not a s 67 permanent street closure; a central bus station requires rezoning under the town‑planning scheme.
Local Government Ordinance s 66 v s 67 – reservation of lanes for exclusive bus use is closure for particular class of traffic; not a s 67 permanent closure; Town Planning and Townships Ordinance and land use scheme – 'existing public road' zoning does not permit a multi‑portal central bus station with buildings; rezoning required; interlocutory interdict requires showing of irreparable harm.
1 December 2014
Reported
Whether a mid-trial guilty plea limited to dolus eventualis excludes minimum sentence application for large-scale fraud.
Fraud; plea of guilty in medias res; dolus eventualis vs dolus directus; scope of evidence after change of plea; applicability of minimum sentence (s51(2)(a)) for large-scale investor fraud; improper judicial interventions.
1 December 2014
Use of EVOLVE on men’s wedding bands did not infringe the registered EVOLYM mark due to insufficient likelihood of confusion.
Trade mark infringement – likelihood of deception or confusion – global appreciation of visual, aural and conceptual similarity – average consumer standard – notional use – distinctiveness of invented marks – nature of goods (jewellery) as considered purchases.
1 December 2014