profile image

Special Tribunal of South Africa

The Special Tribunal has a statutory mandate to recover public funds syphoned from the fiscus through corruption, fraud and illicit money flows. Special tribunals differ from ordinary civil proceedings which are adversarial in nature. The Special Tribunal adopts a more flexible and expeditious approach to legal actions, its proceedings are inquisitorial in nature and characterised by extensive pre-trial investigations.

Rules for the Conduct of Proceedings in the Special Tribunals

Physical address
5th Floor, Center Walk Building (West tower) Thabo Sehume & Pretorious Streets Pretoria 0001
156 judgments
  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Outcomes
  • Case actions
  • Topics
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
156 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
February 2026
Applicant succeeds: tribunal set aside public grant and contract for fraud, pierced corporate veil, ordered repayment and costs.
Administrative law – SIU investigations – Special Tribunal jurisdiction to grant s172 constitutional remedies; delay and condonation in review proceedings; fraud in public grant procurement; piercing corporate veil under s20(9) Companies Act; directors' personal liability and joint-and-several repayment of unlawfully awarded public funds.
20 February 2026
A Special Tribunal can, by harmonious statutory interpretation, order pension deductions to protect misappropriated public funds.
Pension Funds Act s37D – meaning of "court" – Special Investigating Units and Special Tribunals Act s8(2) – harmonious and purposive statutory interpretation – preservation of pension benefits – deductions for compensation arising from theft, dishonesty or fraud.
16 February 2026
SIU review succeeds: emergency appointment and contract set aside for contravening section 217 and procurement prescripts.
Public procurement — Section 217 Constitution — Emergency deviation and deviation approval — Fair, equitable, transparent, competitive and cost‑effective procurement — SIU review powers under SIU Act — Res judicata and arbitration — Condonation of delay — Just and equitable remedies (document production and disgorgement process).
3 February 2026
January 2026
Ex parte preservation order not set aside despite SIU’s non‑disclosure; vehicles released to applicant subject to security and conditions.
Special Tribunal – Preservation (ex parte) orders – duty of full disclosure of material facts – eNATIS registration as prima facie evidence of ownership but not conclusive where underlying transfer is alleged fraudulent – interlocutory balancing of interests – release subject to security and curator controls – costs awarded against SIU.
30 January 2026
Late attempt to add an alternative legality review was refused for unreasonable delay and because it introduced a distinct, unpleaded cause of action.
Civil procedure — Amendment of pleadings — Application to add alternative legality (administrative law) review at late stage — Whether constitutes new cause of action — Delay and condonation in legality reviews — Principles from Constitutional Court (Buffalo City, Gijima) applicable to Special Tribunal — SIU Act permits damages claims in Special Tribunal.
15 January 2026
Default judgment rescinded where applicant relied on erroneous legal advice and demonstrated a bona fide defence with prospects of success.
Rescission of default judgment; reasonable explanation for default; reliance on legal advice; wilful default not an absolute bar; bona fide defence with prospects of success; Special Tribunal jurisdiction to set aside labour settlement agreements.
12 January 2026
December 2025
Tribunal granted an immediate preservation order and caveat preventing transfer of specified property pending SIU civil proceedings.
Special Tribunal – interim preservation/prohibitory order over immovable property – Section 8(2) of SIU Act – Rules 23, 24 and 10(7) of Special Tribunal Rules – caveat registration – Rule 12(9) reconsideration – preservation pending civil proceedings.
18 December 2025
Tribunal authorised SIU search and seizure of premises and documents over suspected COVID‑19 relief scheme maladministration.
Special Investigating Units Act — Search and seizure warrant — Reasonable grounds based on affidavit for alleged maladministration of COVID‑19 relief scheme — Authority to enter, search, copy and seize documents and articles — Identification requirement for executing teams (Annexure D).
10 December 2025
Tribunal granted SIU leave to amend notice to add alternative contract date, finding no prejudice or bad faith.
Amendment of pleadings – Rule 15 read with Tribunal Rule 28 and Uniform Rule 28(10) – late amendment after hearing – whether amendment supported by evidence or excipiable – whether amendment introduces new cause of action – audi alteram partem and prejudice – mala fides/abuse of process – costs to applicant (party-and-party scale B).
8 December 2025
Tribunal granted interim preservation order restraining disposal of listed assets, allowed email service, and ordered deed endorsements.
Special Tribunal – interim preservation/interdict – restraint on disposal of assets listed in Annexure B pending main action KN02/2023 – substituted service by email (Annexure C) – direction to endorse title deeds (Annexure A) – costs reserved.
4 December 2025
The applicant obtained a freezing order preserving suspected proceeds and interdicted the respondents pending recovery proceedings.
Special Tribunal — interim preservation/freezing order — proceeds of unlawful activities — interdiction against disposition of funds — leave to set down for reconsideration — joinder of recipients of unlawfully received grant monies.
3 December 2025
November 2025
SIU granted interim preservation orders restraining dealing with property and vehicle pending review of a tender award.
Special Investigating Unit Act s8(2) – interim preservation orders – prohibition on dealing with immovable property and vehicle – caveat registration – insurance and surrender of Natis documents – ex parte relief – Rule 24 and Rule 10(7) Special Tribunal Rules – review of tender award pending civil recovery proceedings.
24 November 2025
The Tribunal ordered the 11th respondent to pay the applicant R70,000 in two instalments, with no order as to costs.
Special Tribunal – consent order – payment by respondent of R70,000 to applicant – payment into applicant's bank account – two equal instalments – first instalment paid; second due – no order as to costs.
21 November 2025
An amendment seeking monetary relief and veil-piercing needs a clear factual foundation; leave granted subject to a substantial affidavit and costs.
Administrative / procurement law – review of emergency procurement contracts – alleged illegality and public-interest investigatory relief Civil procedure – amendment of pleadings in application proceedings – permissive principle; Evins/Villa Crop/Affordable Medicines authority Relief sought – debatement of monies, repayment with interest, piercing the corporate veil and monetary orders – requires adequate factual foundation Costs – amendment disallowed without substantial affidavit would be unfair; applicant ordered to pay costs (scale C, two counsel)
11 November 2025
Late review condoned; emergency procurement of toilets was irregular, contract set aside and supplier profits ordered forfeited.
Procurement law — Section 217 Constitution — PFMA — Treasury Regulation 16A.6.4 and emergency procurement — irregular expenditure — delivery prior to appointment, pre-bid contact, backdating, false declarations, split payments — review and setting aside of contract — SIU remedial powers — disgorgement of profits — disciplinary measures.
6 November 2025
October 2025
Irregular emergency procurement violated s217; award set aside and supplier ordered to account and disgorge profits.
Public procurement – constitutional duty under s217 – emergency procurement and National Treasury Instruction Notes – irregular deviation from transversal contracts – supplier innocence and estoppel not a bar – hearsay inadmissibility – review and setting aside of award – disgorgement of profits as just and equitable remedy.
30 October 2025
Tribunal varied preservation order to empower a Curator to seize and inventory syndicate assets (including bank records and crypto) up to R900m.
Special Tribunal – Variation of prior preservation order – Ex parte hearing and dispensation of service – Endorsement of caveats on title deeds – Appointment and expansive powers of Curator to assume custody, inventory and seize assets (including crypto) up to R900 million – Compulsion of banks to disclose account/investment records – Authorised searches, use of locksmiths and reasonable force, seizure, photographing and requiring surrender of assets
7 October 2025
The applicant failed to prove corrupt collusion; procurement irregularities alone did not justify setting aside the contract.
Public procurement – Supply Chain Management – emergency procurement during COVID-19 – deviations from SCM and National Treasury notes – procedural irregularities do not alone prove corruption Evidence – civil standard – inferential reasoning and circumstantial evidence – requirement of primary objective facts; limits to extended inference. Special Tribunal procedure – Rule 19 and s 9(3) SIU Act – evidentiary flexibility does not justify speculation or abandonment of proof obligations Relief – setting aside contracts and disgorgement require proof of unlawful award or corrupt agreement, not merely irregular process
7 October 2025
The Tribunal granted an interim preservation order restraining respondents from dealing in specified properties and directed caveats pending review.
Special Tribunal — SIU Act s8(2) — interim preservation orders prohibiting dealing in property — Rules 23(1) and 23(4)(a) — condonation for non-compliance with Rule 12(2) — Registrar of Deeds directed to lodge caveat — reconsideration under Rule 12(9) and case management under Rule 19.
3 October 2025
Applicant failed to establish entitlement to an interim preservation order restraining rental payments under disputed lease.
Special Investigating Unit – interim preservation order – request to restrain rental payments and to pay rentals into trust pending trial. Procurement law – alleged contravention of Section 217(1) of the Constitution and fraud – does not automatically justify interim interference. Interim relief – requirements of prima facie right, irreparable harm, balance of convenience and absence of alternative remedies; failure to establish same leads to dismissal. Contract law – court reluctant to interfere with existing, operative lease without adequate justification
1 October 2025
September 2025
Ex parte interim preservation order appoints Curator Bonis, restrains asset disposal, and pierces corporate/trust veils pending SIU proceedings.
* Special Tribunal – Ex parte interim preservation/interdict – appointment of Curator Bonis – restraint on alienation and encumbrance of specified movable and immovable assets pending SIU civil proceedings. Powers of Curator Bonis – custody, preservation, insurance, collection of income, sale/lease with proceeds preserved in trust. Piercing corporate and trust veils – directors and trustees made personally liable for acts of entities/trust for interim relief. Interaction with SARS/AFU enforcement – existing attachments/forfeitures preserved; returned assets subject to Tribunal preservation. Mandatory full and frank sworn disclosure of assets by implicated parties
29 September 2025
PPE supply contract void where supplier lacked required SAHPRA distribution licence; repayment, interest and costs ordered.
Procurement law – emergency procurement and deviations – TNI 8/2019/20 and TNI 3/2020/21; Public Finance Management Act compliance; Medical regulatory law – Masks as medical devices; SAHPRA licensing requirement for manufacture/distribution/wholesale; Consequence of unlawful distribution – contract void ab initio and restitution; Interest and costs (including two counsel).
29 September 2025
A fraudulent misstatement of tendering experience and improper evaluation rendered the award and contract unlawful; repayment ordered.
• Administrative law – Public procurement – Section 217 Constitution – requirement of fair, equitable, transparent and cost‑effective procurement. • Tender evaluation – Application of functionality sub‑criteria; invalid scoring and unjustified departure from highest‑scoring bidder. • Fraud in procurement – Misrepresentation of past projects; fraud vitiates procurement and unravels contracts. • CIDB Regulations – Contractor grading limits and reasonable excess; award beyond grading unlawful. • Remedy – Review and setting aside of award and contract; restitution/order for repayment; costs (including two counsel).
5 September 2025
Stay pending review refused where review of SIU report would not dispose of SIU’s distinct civil claim; costs to SIU.
Special Tribunal — stay pending review — test for stay: same issues/parties, prospects of success, balance of convenience, interests of justice — where SIU civil claim rests on evidentiary enquiry into irregular supplier appointment, review of SIU report findings against one respondent did not resolve civil claim — stay refused; amendment to limit stay to that respondent granted.
3 September 2025
August 2025
Applicant granted leave to admit third supplementary affidavit as new material justified departure from ordinary affidavit limits; costs reserved.
Supplementary affidavits — discretion to permit further affidavits where new, material evidence emerges; lapsed appeal under Rule 49; bare denials insufficient to defeat admission; hearsay/expert-report objections go to weight, not interlocutory admission; costs reserved to main application.
26 August 2025
Delay condoned; emergency procurement complied with treasury rules and section 217; review dismissed and costs awarded against the applicant.
Special Tribunal — emergency procurement during National State of Disaster — Treasury Regulation 16A.6.4 and NT Instruction Note 5 — review of procurement under section 217 Constitution and PFMA — condonation of delay — materiality of procedural irregularities — necessity for consequential relief and costs where investigatory findings do not support review.
20 August 2025
Tender award and contract declared invalid; respondents ordered to account and repay profits following setting aside of SLA.
Administrative law – procurement – setting aside of unlawful tender award – invalidity of Service Level Agreement – restitution and provision of financial disclosure for determination of profit to be repaid – process for dispute resolution following setting aside of public contract
19 August 2025
July 2025
SIU failed to prove wilful, mala fide non‑compliance with Tribunal order; contempt application dismissed.
Contempt of court – civil contempt requisites: existence and service of order, non‑compliance, wilfulness and mala fides proven beyond reasonable doubt. Jurisdictional challenge and pending review – launching review proceedings may be bona fide and not necessarily evidence of contumacious conduct. Tribunal procedure – effect of paragraph 8 (Case Management Conference) on enforcement steps Relief – committal/arrest and coercive measures inappropriate where mala fides not proved; no costs ordered
23 July 2025
Applicant had standing but failure to join National Treasury barred review of procurement deviation, so application dismissed.
Administrative law – review of procurement award – SIU locus standi under Presidential Proclamation and s5(5) SIU Act; harmonious interpretation of Proclamation and Schedule. Procurement law – Constitution s217, PFMA and Treasury Regulations – deviations from normal procurement; urgency and self-created urgency. Civil procedure – joinder – decision of National Treasury granting a deviation remains valid until set aside; non-joinder fatal to review
10 July 2025
June 2025
NLC grant decisions set aside as unlawful for conflict of interest; Board member and beneficiary entities ordered to repay funds.
Administrative law – review – grant funding – irregular awarding of public funds – conflict of interest – breach of fiduciary duties – admissibility of hearsay evidence – motion proceedings – personal liability of public officials – just and equitable relief – corruption and constitutional principles
30 June 2025
Court voids tenders awarded to Kroucamp Plumbers due to corruption and lifts corporate veil for direct liability.
Administrative law – Tenders – Legality of tender awards – Fraudulent practices and conflicts of interest; Corporate law – Lifting the corporate veil; Application for condonation – delay – Interests of justice.
13 June 2025
Special Tribunal grants interim interdict against pension fund withdrawal amid allegations of public fund misappropriation.
Pension Funds - Interim interdict - Jurisdiction of Special Tribunal - Misconduct leading to public fund misappropriation - Procedural errors in entity citation rectified without prejudice.
10 June 2025
The court nullified a contract due to irregular procurement processes violating constitutional principles.
Procurement Law – irregularity in awarding and extending public contracts – legality and constitutionality under section 217 of the Constitution – setting aside of appointments and contracts due to procedural failings.
5 June 2025
May 2025
Urgent application granted to interdict pension payments pending finalization of legal proceedings.
Special Tribunal – Urgent Application – Condonation for non-compliance with rules – Pension benefits – Interdict pending finalization of proceedings.
15 May 2025
Tribunal found contract awards and payments to Buthelezi EMS entities unlawful, ordering restitution and financial scrutiny.
Public procurement - Invalid contract awards and unlawful payments - Restitution obligations for unlawfully received funds - Procedure for financial accountability and recovery.
5 May 2025
Contracts awarded to Vitae Zoe for temperature devices declared unlawful, prompting financial review and costs orders.
Public procurement - Unlawful contract award - Contracts declared invalid - Financial rectification ordered - Costs awarded to applicant
5 May 2025
April 2025
Government procurement of Microsoft Licenses declared unconstitutional, requiring SoftwareOne to repay derived profits.
Contract Law – Procurement – Constitutionality of government contracting process – Award and agreements declared unconstitutional and set aside.
30 April 2025
Tribunal granted ex parte interim restraint and caveat preventing transfer or encumbrance of specified property pending SIU proceedings.
Special Tribunal – ex parte interim relief – Preservation order restraining sale, transfer or encumbrance of immovable property – Power to hear in chambers without notice (Rule 24) – Direction to Deeds Registry to register caveat – Interim relief pending institution of civil proceedings (60 court days) – Right to apply for reconsideration and judicial case management.
23 April 2025
The Tribunal appointed a curator bonis to preserve assets pending litigation, restricting certain asset transactions.
Special Tribunal Order – Curatorship appointment – Asset restraint pending litigation – Costs of asset management
22 April 2025
Interim interdict granted preventing disposal of Mercedes-Benz pending investigation; disclosure and insurance required.
Interim relief – Interdiction against asset disposal pending investigation – Obligation to disclose and insure asset – Reconsideration under Tribunal rules
15 April 2025
Special Tribunal restricts dealings with property in an ex parte order pending civil case resolution.
Special Tribunal order – Ex parte application – Immoveable property – Property dealing prohibition – Reconsideration procedures
8 April 2025
Interdict granted to prevent disposition of assets pending civil recovery proceedings by the State.
Asset preservation – Interdict – Interim relief against property transactions pending civil proceedings for State recovery claims under SIU Act
8 April 2025
March 2025
Interim preservation order restraining pension payout and beneficiary withdrawals pending resolution of review proceedings.
Interim relief – preservation of assets – prohibition against payment or disposal of pension fund benefits pending review proceedings; Pension law/administration – restraint on pension fund and administrator from paying benefit; Interim prohibitory relief – beneficiary restrained from withdrawing or dealing with funds; Costs reserved to main application.
31 March 2025
Civil Remedies – Injunctions and interdicts – Interdict
17 March 2025
Civil Remedies – Injunctions and interdicts – Interlocutory
4 March 2025
February 2025
Civil Procedure – Appeals and reviews – Judicial Review
18 February 2025
Civil Procedure – Parties – Joinder Civil Procedure – Pleadings – Amendment to Pleadings
17 February 2025
Civil Procedure – Appeals and reviews – Administrative review Civil Procedure – Orders – Condonation Special Tribunal – Administrative Law – Government Contracting
12 February 2025
January 2025
Civil Remedies – Special Tribunal – Ex Parte Order
23 January 2025
Civil Procedure – Parties - Joinder
23 January 2025