background image
profile image

High Court of South Africa Western Cape, Cape Town

Currently serving on the bench:

Judge President N P Mabindla-Boqwana

Deputy Judge President P L Goliath

Judge N C Erasmus

Judge R Allie

Judge T C Ndita

Judge A Le Grange

Judge V C Saldanha

Judge C M J Fortuin

Judge M I Samela

Judge R C A Henney

Judge M J Dolamo

Judge J I Cloete

Judge B P Mantame

Judge K M Savage

Judge G Salie Da Silva

Judge L Nuku

Judge E D Wille

Judge T Papier

Judge M K Parker

Judge M Sher

Judge S Kusevitsky

Judge H M Slingers

Judge M Francis

Judge N Mangcu-Lockwood

Judge J D Lekhuleni

Judge D M Thulare

Judge C N Nziweni

Judge M Holderness

Judge M Pangarker

Judge N E Ralarala

 

Physical address
Physical: 35 Keerom Street, Cape Town, 8000 Post: Private Bag X 9020, Cape Town, 8001
37 judgments

Court registries

  • Filters
  • Judges
  • Labels
  • Case actions
  • Alphabet
Sort by:
37 judgments
Citation
Judgment date
September 2024
Court held execution to frustrate appeal rights unlawful and reinstated applicant pending filing of SCA petition.
Civil procedure – Suspension of execution under Superior Courts Act s 18 – s 18(5) requires lodging with registrar to suspend operation of decision. Abuse of process – expedited execution to thwart appeal rights may be unlawful and subject to court redress. Interim relief – Rule 45A and inherent powers permit suspension of execution and restoration of status quo ante pending lodging of appeal petition. Costs – punitive costs appropriate where respondent engineered a fait accompli to frustrate appeal rights.
30 September 2024
Reported
High Court interdicted an impeached former judge from participating in JSC processes pending review of his parliamentary designation.
Constitutional & administrative law – National Assembly’s designation to the Judicial Service Commission – scope of High Court jurisdiction versus exclusive Constitutional Court jurisdiction under s167(4)(e) – reviewability under PAJA/legality – exercise of constitutional discretion in s178(1)(h) – compatibility with s165(4) protecting judicial independence – interim interdicts to preserve integrity of JSC processes.
27 September 2024
Reported
Executor removed for conflicts of interest, partiality and conduct prejudicial to estate; foreign‑litigation costs excluded from estate recovery.
Administration of Estates — Removal of Executor — s54(1)(a)(v) — conflict of interest and partiality where executor is also beneficiary and has engaged in conduct advantaging certain heirs — duties and fiduciary obligations of executor — intervention in foreign litigation and estate costs — failure to lodge liquidation and distribution account timeously — surviving spouse (married in community of property) has standing to seek removal.
26 September 2024
Court grants plaintiff leave to amend, permits joinder by motion, and orders costs against opposing defendants.
Civil procedure – amendment of pleadings – substantial substitution of particulars – objections as to jurisdiction, prescription and pleading foreign law are triable issues and do not justify refusal of amendment at pleading stage. Joinder – edictal citation for offshore defendants – application acceptable where not opposed but intendit should be updated. Foreign law – not required to be pleaded in detail in particulars; establishable by expert evidence at trial. Piercing corporate veil – sufficient particularity pleaded to raise triable issue. Costs – unsuccessful opposition to amendment and edictal citation ordered party-and-party costs including two counsel, not punitive.
25 September 2024
Reported
Court confirmed lawful termination of debt review, rejected good‑faith and reckless‑credit defences, and ordered return of the financed taxi.
National Credit Act — debt review (s86) — obligation to participate in good faith (s86(5)) and credit provider’s right to terminate after 60 business days (s86(10)); resumption of debt review (s86(11)) — evidentiary threshold and competence; reckless credit (s80/81) — onus on consumer to particularise contemporaneous facts; remedies under s83 — suspension, setting aside or restructuring limited where agreement validly cancelled; repossession rights on cancellation of instalment-sale agreement.
25 September 2024
Condonation for late statutory notice dismissed: unexplained delays and weak merits precluded good cause.
Delict — statutory notice under Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Certain Organs of State Act — condonation: requirements of s 3(4)(b) — good cause assessed by explanation for delay and prospects of success; delay in instituting/pursuing condonation relevant; unreasonable delay entails prejudice.
25 September 2024
Plaintiff proved oral nominee agreements; court ordered repayment, sale of property and awarded costs against defaulting defendant.
Property law – nominee/agency arrangement – oral/tacit agreement enforceable where not effecting immediate alienation; Alienation of Land Act s2(1) strictly construed – does not invalidate nominee arrangements contemplating future sales; Tacit terms – assessed by conduct, correspondence and surrounding circumstances, standard: balance of probabilities; Admissibility and weight of affidavits of deceased by agreement – permissible where fair and corroborated; Civil procedure – trial in absence of defendant – justified where litigant wilfully delays, fails to obtain representation and furnishes insufficient medical evidence; Costs – attorney and client where conduct is vexatious and causes unnecessary expense.
23 September 2024
Plaintiff's claim against the doctor prescribed because he had knowledge of the material facts by 20 June 2017.
Prescription Act s12(3) – commencement of prescription requires knowledge of debtor’s identity and material facts (facta probanda); employment status of practitioner is not a material fact postponing prescription; onus on defendant to prove date of knowledge; discovery by correspondence or subsequent diagnosis that only yields legal conclusions does not reset prescription; attorney-and-client costs awarded to successful defendant.
23 September 2024
Respondents held in contempt for failing to hand over body corporate documents; fines, suspended imprisonment and costs ordered.
Contempt of court – failure by managing agent to hand over body corporate documents following registered CSOS adjudication – authority and locus standi of attorneys – single-stage civil contempt procedure and Rule nisi – mitigation (mental health) considered but sanction required to vindicate court authority; judicial fine, suspended periodic committal and costs ordered.
23 September 2024
Applicant entitled to interim RAF payments; plea admission established statutory liability and RAF’s subrogation directive rejected.
Procedure — Uniform Rule 34A — interim payment — requirements and judicial discretion to grant interim awards where liability admitted in plea. Road Accident Fund — statutory liability under s17 — concession of insured driver’s negligence in plea constitutes admission of liability for interim relief. Medical expenses — Medical Schemes Act and subrogation — RAF’s internal directive cannot lawfully avoid payment of collateral medical benefits; precedent requires RAF to reimburse appropriate past medical expenses. WCC award — obligation to furnish full calculations to permit like-for-like set-off; WCC award does not automatically bar interim payments.
23 September 2024
Exception upheld where plaintiff failed to plead legal duty, wrongfulness and adequate particulars of pure economic loss.
Exception – no cause of action; Pure economic loss – delict; Wrongfulness/duty – must be pleaded and defined where not self-evident; Causation and quantum – Rule 18(10) requires sufficient particulars; Leave to amend granted.
20 September 2024
A restraint of trade clause was enforced despite a drafting omission, with rectification allowed and a focused client list for fairness.
Restraint of trade – Interpretation and rectification of contract – Enforceability of restraint clause despite drafting omission – Non-solicitation of clients – Confidential information – Reasonableness of restraint – Amendment of citation – Costs on attorney and client scale.
19 September 2024
Reported
Non-variation clause upheld; handwritten amendment ineffective; public policy and fraud defences fail; all claims dismissed.
Contract law – non-variation clause – handwritten amendment ineffective where not signed per clause; Cession – locus standi of cessionary established; Public policy – sparing application, onus on party alleging non‑compliance; Fraud/Grusd – fraud must be pleaded and proved, intent/knowledge required; Unjust enrichment – failed where payment by cessionary exceeded alleged overpayment; Warranties/indemnities – cover the ceded contract (unamended) and no breach proved.
18 September 2024
Handwritten, unsigned amendments fail non-variation clauses; cessionary’s warranty/indemnity claims based on the unamended contract fail.
Contract law – non-variation clause – handwritten amendment unsigned by lessor ineffective and unenforceable. Cession – locus standi to sue under valid cession; warranties/indemnities relate to the Contract as ceded. Public policy – non-variation clauses enforced except in clearest cases; absence of explanation for non-compliance fatal. Fraud/Grusd – fraud must be pleaded and proved; allowing benefit does not dispense with intent requirement. Enrichment – claimant not impoverished where cessionary paid greater sum to prior supplier than alleged overpayment.
18 September 2024
A pre-emptive right is triggered by receipt of an offer; the holder must step into the third party's terms and cannot vary the sale.
Pre-emptive rights – trigger point is receipt of a third-party offer; exercise requires stepping into third party's position on same terms; holder cannot vary or cherry-pick sale terms; usufruct precedes registered owner's pre-emptive right for leases; conditional consent does not constitute irrevocable waiver of usufruct.
18 September 2024
Marital co-ownership of the family home can be 'bound' by marriage and its division deferred until divorce resolution.
Property law – Actio communi dividundo – availability where co-ownership arises from marriage out of community with accrual; distinction between free and bound co-ownership. Matrimonial/property law – marital home acquired during marriage constitutes bound co-ownership if it arises from the extrinsic matrimonial relationship. Equitable discretion – when physical partition impracticable, court may order sale, award property to one owner with compensation, or other modes; must consider market value, equity, accrual, and maintenance. Procedural – termination of co-ownership and ancillary accounts appropriately determined concurrently with divorce/patrimonial claims where issues are interdependent.
16 September 2024
Applicant obtains final winding‑up; respondent found unable to pay debts and member referred for perjury investigation.
• Company/Close corporation law – winding‑up – where creditor holds admitted, due and payable debt – final winding‑up order appropriate. • Insolvency – commercial insolvency test preferred to contested unproven asset valuations. • Civil procedure – bona fide dispute defence – narrow discretion to refuse winding‑up where debt is admitted and dispute unsubstantiated. • Costs – costs in the liquidation; attorney‑and‑client scale where opposition is vexatious and dishonest. • Perjury – referral to DPP where respondent’s member made false sworn statements.
13 September 2024
Whether deportation of asylum‑seekers can be interdicted pending merits determinations given non‑refoulement and separation‑of‑powers.
Refugee law – non‑refoulement – interim interdict against deportation pending merits determination; suspension of statutory provisions – heightened test (OUTA/EFF) and separation of powers; persuasive effect of Constitutional Court in Ashebo; case management and costs in cause.
13 September 2024
Municipality not liable for plaintiff’s fall on a walkway serving a private centre; plaintiff failed to prove wrongfulness, negligence or causation.
Delict – municipality liability for omissions; legal duty and wrongfulness assessed against public policy; private encroachment onto municipal land; NBRSA s 23—limits of statutory indemnity for positive acts vs omissions; onus to prove causation and negligence.
12 September 2024
Appeal upheld: convictions for theft and perjury overturned due to inadequate evidence and trial misdirections.
Criminal law – Theft and perjury – sufficiency of evidence – State failed to prove theft as charged; conviction unsafe. Evidence – failure to call witnesses able to explain final statement of account; failure to consider crucial invoice (Exhibit V) and SIU investigator’s concessions. Procedural – duplication of charges where multiple counts arise from same narrow set of facts. Section 174 – discharge where State has not established a prima facie case. Judicial review on appeal – appellate intervention warranted for material misdirections in credibility and fact-finding.
12 September 2024
Reported
The respondent liable where open train doors led to the applicant being pushed from a moving train.
Public carrier duty – obligation to keep carriage doors closed while trains in motion – delictual liability for omission. Evidence and probabilities – corroboration by ambulance and hospital records supports applicant's version despite absence of respondent's incident reports. Causation – established by but-for (conditio sine qua non) test linking open doors to ejection and injury. Contributory negligence – not established where applicant did not voluntarily assume or appreciate the risk sufficiently to reduce liability.
10 September 2024
A court-appointed receiver owes fiduciary transparency and must disclose bank statements and documents used to calculate trust distributions.
Trusts — Receivership — Receiver’s fiduciary duties to beneficiaries; obligation to account fully and disclose supporting documents used in liquidation and distribution account; breach of s10(1) Trust Property Control Act by commingling trust funds; production of bank statements and interest-calculation schedules; extension of dissolution date and procedural timetable; costs awarded against receiver.
10 September 2024
A non-responsive tenderer has standing but failed to show grounds for an interim interdict halting the tender award.
Administrative law – tenders – standing of non‑responsive tenderer to challenge award; Interim interdict – requirements (prima facie right, irreparable harm, balance of convenience) – ineffectiveness of review and entrenchment arguments; Contract vs administrative action – termination notice; Separation of powers – court should not select contracting party to continue performance; Costs – Biowatch protection in constitutional/administrative challenges.
10 September 2024
A damages claim for fraudulent misrepresentation arising from a consent divorce order is not automatically barred by res judicata.
Civil procedure – exception – res judicata – consent settlement made an order of court – distinguishability of relief and cause of action; Delict/contract – fraudulent misrepresentation – accounting and debatement to quantify damages; Fraud vitiates transactions; Pleading sufficiency for damages claim arising from alleged fraud.
9 September 2024
CSOS may adjudicate building‑penalty disputes; penalties invalid where imposed without fair notice or opportunity to be heard.
Community Schemes Ombud Service Act — jurisdiction to adjudicate building/contractual penalties; distinction between ‘void’ and ‘invalid’ decisions (s41); section 39(1) financial issues includes penalties; procedural fairness before levying building penalties (notice and opportunity to remedy/represent); CSOS jurisdiction upheld by case law (Chapman's Bay; Stone River).
6 September 2024
Appeal against convictions and life sentences for rape of a minor dismissed; trial court’s credibility and sentence upheld.
Criminal law – Sexual offences – Evidence of single child witness and cautionary approach; credibility and evaluation of inconsistencies and delayed reporting; appellate interference with trial credibility findings (S v Francis); sentencing – prescribed minimum life sentences for rape of a minor and assessment of substantial and compelling circumstances (Malgas/Zinn).
6 September 2024
Reported
Whether plaintiff’s diminished earning capacity from police assault warranted an actuarial award and quantum.
Delict — future loss of earning capacity — expert evidence (industrial psychologists, psychologist) — actuarial computation — choice of earnings basis (corporate surveys v STATSSA) — contingencies and contingency differential — mitigation and credibility.
6 September 2024
Summary judgment refused where application was procedurally late and the claimed amount was not a readily ascertainable liquidated sum.
Summary judgment — strict compliance with rule 32(2) — timely delivery and set-down — liquidated amount — claim not liquidated where ledger contains unexplained opening balance and untaxed legal fees — suretyship liability — effect of sublease and alleged prejudice to sureties.
6 September 2024
Appeal dismissed: convictions and life sentences for gang rape of an intellectually disabled minor upheld; J88 admitted and expert evidence accepted.
Criminal law – Sexual offences – Rape of a minor with intellectual disability – competence and credibility of a vulnerable complainant; intermediary testimony. Evidence – Hearsay and medico-legal J88 report – provisional admission, expert interpretation and probative value. Identification – proof beyond reasonable doubt and rejection of accused’s alibi as not reasonably possibly true. Sentence – application of prescribed minimum (life) where rape committed by multiple offenders on a mentally disabled minor; no substantial and compelling circumstances. Court administration – duty to ensure functioning audio equipment for intermediary evidence; referral to professional regulator for allegedly deficient medical examination.
5 September 2024
Late leave to appeal against final sequestration refused for inordinate delay and inadequate explanation.
Civil procedure — Condonation for late filing of leave to appeal — test: extent and cause of delay, reasonableness of explanation, prejudice, prospects of success. Insolvency — sequestration — final sequestration order: appeal lodged late; trustees appointed and estate realisation advanced. Rule 46A — allegation that sequestration was used to circumvent Rule 46A rejected as previously considered. Constitutional right to housing (s26) — raised but did not justify condonation or prospect of success. Costs — costs awarded to applicant from insolvent estate, including two counsel on specified scales.
5 September 2024
Applicant failed to prove incapacity or duress to rescind consent order; application dismissed with adverse costs.
Family law — rescission of consent order — application to set aside parental-responsibility and adoption clauses — onus to prove lack of capacity or duress — relevance of contemporaneous evidence and advice — motion proceedings and referral to oral evidence — exercise of discretion in awarding attorney-and-client and party-and-party costs.
4 September 2024
Reported
Criminal court lacked jurisdiction to order mayor to establish trust; appellate court set aside sentencing orders as nullities.
Criminal law — Sentencing powers — Limits on a criminal court’s jurisdiction to make orders affecting non-parties and organs of state; administrative/municipal powers — orders compelling a mayor to establish a trust may be ultra vires and conflict with MFMA; Constitutional law — separation of powers, principle of legality and inherent powers (s173) limited to developing common law where necessary; Children’s rights — s28(2) (best interests of the child) only applies where proceedings are a matter concerning the child; Procedural fairness — necessity to join or notify affected parties (audi alteram partem).
3 September 2024
Rescission refused: personal service upheld and costs de bonis propriis awarded against the applicant’s attorney.
Rescission of judgment – Rule 42(1)(a) – requirement of absence and material procedural error; sheriff’s return prima facie evidence of personal service; National Credit Act s86(10) – valid termination of debt review; wilful default vs excusable absence; costs de bonis propriis – personal liability of attorney (attorney-and-client scale).
3 September 2024
VAB’s valuation of a life-right retirement village was irrationally calculated and must be set aside and reheard by a differently constituted board.
Property rates valuation – life-right retirement scheme – requirement to apply generally recognised valuation methodologies (s45 Rates Act) – failure to account for contractual repayment obligations and levies – occupancy and waiting-list relevance – VAB decision irrational and reviewable under PAJA.
3 September 2024
A magistrate erred by holding the Administration of Estates Act ousted creditors’ common-law right to sue a deceased estate.
Administration of Estates Act – effect on creditors’ common-law rights; jurisdiction of magistrate’s court to entertain claims against deceased estates; default judgment; misdirection in law by lower court.
2 September 2024
Applicant sought vehicle release after BEC; court found likely email compromise but dismissed the application as inappropriate.
Cybercrime / Business Email Compromise (BEC) — email authentication (SPF/DMARC/ARC), altered attachments and attribution of compromise Interim and mandatory interdicts — requirements for final interdictory relief; substance over form; appropriateness where ownership/liability disputed Vindicatory relief (rei vindicatio) — ownership vs possession in financed sale; financier’s rights and suitability for motion proceedings Evidentiary issues — admissibility and weight of forensic expert affidavit evidence in motion proceedings; need for further procedural steps (cross-examination/case management) Contractual retention clauses — distinction between ownership retention and right to deliver/transfer possession
2 September 2024
Whether CSOS adjudicators have jurisdiction to review reasonableness of body corporate meeting decisions under s38/39 or s6(9) STSMA.
Community Schemes Ombud Service Act — jurisdiction of Ombud and Adjudicators under ss 38–39; Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act s 6(9) — recourse to Ombud but does not oust CSOS procedures; review standard — application of reasonableness in body corporate decision-making; remedy — remittal to Ombud Service for merits and costs.
2 September 2024