Bodley v Bodley [1911] ZATPD 119 (14 August 1911)

Reported
Flynote

Husband and wife - Divorce - Forfeiture of benefits - Successful party disentitled

 

Case summary

A suspicion of misconduct on the part of a spouse who successfully sues for divorce on the ground of malicious desertion is not sufficient to disentitle him to an order against the deserter for forfeiture of benefits.
(Eksteen vs. Eksteen 9 S.C. 100, distinguished).

 


Loading PDF...

This document is 237.1 KB. Do you want to load it?

▲ To the top