R v Rosen [1912] ZATPD 142 (25 November 1912)

Reported
Flynote

Criminal Law.-lmmorality.-Proceeds of Prostitution.
-Living on.-Visible Means of Subsistence.-Onus.
-Ordinance 46 of 1903, secs 21 (a) and 21 (3).-
Act 16 of 1908.-Criminal Procedure.-Joint Trial.
-Prisoners separately charged.- Irregularity.-06-
jection.-Prejudice.

Case summary

In a prosecution under sec. 21 (a), read with sec. 21 (3)
of Ordinance 46 of 1903, the onus which is on the
Crown of proving that the accused had no visible
means of subsistence is discharged by proof that he
had no regular employment or no apparent means of
livelihood,


Loading PDF...

This document is 363.2 KB. Do you want to load it?

▲ To the top