- Flynote
-
Law of contract – cancellation in terms of provisions of contract –
contracting party applying for interdict to stop cancellation pending judicial
review of decision to cancel – interdict granted – cancellation of contract not
reviewable – does not involve control of public power – not administrative action
– neither reviewable under principle of legality – interdict legally unsustainable
– contempt of court – order based on legally unsustainable interdict – fatally
defective – requisites for contempt in any event not met – execution of contempt
order granted in terms of s 18 of Superior Courts Act 10 of 2013 – also defective
– execution requirements not met.
This document is 491.9 KB. Do you want to load it?
Cited documents 13
Judgment 10
Legislation 3
1. | Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 | 4487 citations |
2. | Promotion of Administrative Justice Act, 2000 | 2228 citations |
3. | Superior Courts Act, 2013 | 1491 citations |
Documents citing this one 2
Judgment 2
1. | Moyo v Old Mutual Limited and Others (22791/19) [2022] ZAGPJHC 310 (16 May 2022) | |
2. | Sienaert Prop CC v City of Johannesburg and Another (31566/21) [2021] ZAGPJHC 153 (22 November 2021) |