Marais and Another v Marrais and Another (73511/2015) [2018] ZAGPPHC 295 (29 June 2018)

Marais and Another v Marrais and Another (73511/2015) [2018] ZAGPPHC 295 (29 June 2018)

Loading PDF...

This document is 28.4 KB. Do you want to load it?

Error loading PDF
Try reloading the page or downloading the PDF.
Error:

Cited documents 0

Documents citing this one 1

Judgment
1
Reported
Whether protest songs, in their full political context, constitute hate speech and whether a judge should be recused.
Recusal – reasonable apprehension of bias – objective test: reasonable, informed person on correct facts; comments must be read in context; high threshold for displacing presumption of judicial impartiality; Issue estoppel/res judicata – prior settlement does not automatically bar fresh litigation where interests of justice, alleged breaches and public importance justify adjudication; Hate speech – s 10(1) Equality Act (post-Qwelane) two-stage inquiry: (1) speech based on prohibited ground; (2) could reasonably be construed to demonstrate clear intention to be harmful/incite harm and promote hatred; Context, speaker identity and political purpose critical; Political protest songs with historical tradition may be protected expression and not hate speech.
To the top