Judgments
29,639
judgments
All courts
Explore judgments from all courts.
Explore all courts →
High Courts
- High Court of South Africa Eastern Cape, Bhisho
- High Court of South Africa Eastern Cape, East London Local Court
- High Court of South Africa Eastern Cape, Grahamstown
- High Court of South Africa Eastern Cape, Mthatha
- High Court of South Africa Eastern Cape, Port Elizabeth
- High Court of South Africa Free State, Bloemfontein
- High Court of South Africa KwaZulu-Natal, Durban
- High Court of South Africa KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg
- High Court of South Africa Limpopo, Polokwane
- High Court of South Africa Limpopo, Thohoyandou
- High Court of South Africa Mpumalanga, Mbombela
- High Court of South Africa Northern Cape, Kimberley
- High Court of South Africa North Gauteng, Pretoria
- High Court of South Africa North-West, Mafikeng
- High Court of South Africa South Gauteng, Johannesburg
- High Court of South Africa Western Cape, Cape Town
Recent judgments
|
s17(2)(f) referral dismissed; AOS and contractor’s lien void for agent’s misrepresentation, conflict of interest and abuse of company personality.
s 17(2)(f) Superior Courts Act — referral for reconsideration; estate agency — duty to disclose interest and requirement of fidelity fund certificate; misrepresentation; conflict of interest; cession validity under AOS; builder’s lien — absence of disclosure/proof and abuse of juristic personality; representation of juristic persons by lay persons.
|
12 November 2025 |
|
The appellant’s personal mitigation did not amount to substantial and compelling circumstances to avoid prescribed minimum sentences.
Criminal law – sentence – prescribed minimum sentences – substantial and compelling circumstances to deviate; Sentencing – brutality of offence outweighing personal mitigation; Constitutional law – equality challenge to divergent appellate sentencing outcomes; Procedural – desirability that related appeals of co‑accused be heard by same court to avoid inconsistent outcomes.
|
12 November 2025 |
|
An amendment seeking monetary relief and veil-piercing needs a clear factual foundation; leave granted subject to a substantial affidavit and costs.
• Administrative / procurement law – review of emergency procurement contracts – alleged illegality and public-interest investigatory relief
• Civil procedure – amendment of pleadings in application proceedings – permissive principle; Evins/Villa Crop/Affordable Medicines authority
• Relief sought – debatement of monies, repayment with interest, piercing the corporate veil and monetary orders – requires adequate factual foundation
• Costs – amendment disallowed without substantial affidavit would be unfair; applicant ordered to pay costs (scale C, two counsel)
|
11 November 2025 |
|
Court confirmed sequestration, refused extension, finding the guarantee a primary obligation and a reasonable prospect of benefit to creditors.
Insolvency — sequestration — extension of provisional sequestration order — test for postponement/extension (prima facie defence and reasonable explanation) — demand guarantee vs suretyship — primary/demand undertaking enforceable despite challenge to underlying debtor’s agreement — waiver of excussion — insurance payments speculative/res inter alios acta — benefit to creditors: reasonable prospect of uncovering concealed assets (nulla bona returns).
|
10 November 2025 |
|
A superior court may, under section 173, enroll and postpone procedural matters despite Uniform Rules, where interests of justice permit.
* Constitutional and civil procedure – inherent power of Superior Courts (section 173) – courts may regulate their own processes and depart from strict observance of Uniform Rules where interests of justice require; rules exist for courts, not courts for rules.
* Procedure – enrollment and postponement of matters on motion roll – Registrar not shown to have exclusive enrollment power under rule 6.
* Limits – inherent power confined to procedural matters and subject to prejudice/interests of justice assessment.
* Costs – interlocutory costs reserved for determination by the hearing court.
|
10 November 2025 |
|
Application for anti‑spoliatory relief dismissed for lack of statutory notice and absence of prior possession; punitive costs awarded.
Customs and Excise Act s96(1) – jurisdictional notice requirement; mandament van spolie – requirement of prior peaceful possession; urgency practice – abuse of urgent process; Uniform Rule 7 – authority to represent; costs de bonis propriis and attorney-and-client scale.
|
10 November 2025 |
|
WhatsApp messages and banking entries proved that payments in a romantic context were loans, not donations.
* Contract — loan v donation — oral loans during a romantic relationship — role of contemporaneous electronic communications and bank references in proving intention.
* Evidence — weight of documentary evidence vis-à-vis witness demeanour; adverse inference from silence where repudiation expected (McWilliams principle).
* Civil procedure — absolution from the instance set aside where plaintiffs discharge onus on probabilities.
|
10 November 2025 |
|
Whether regulation 12(4) governs municipal manager appointments or section 54A’s deeming provision validates them.
Local government law – Appointment of municipal manager – Regulation 12(4) applies to senior managers accountable to municipal manager, not municipal managers – Section 54A(7)–(10) LGM: Municipal Systems Act requires MEC notification and allows appointment to be deemed compliant if MEC/Minister do not act – Judicial review – validity of appointment where statutory challenge not pursued by MEC/Minister.
|
7 November 2025 |
|
A sole director without registered shareholding or mandate unlawfully transferred company funds; rule nisi confirmed.
Companies law; corporate authority and bank mandates – whether a sole director had authority to transact; alleged share sale and registration – effect of absent company/CIPC records; fiduciary duties and s75(3) Companies Act – related‑party transactions require shareholder approval; interim restitutionary relief (rule nisi) confirmed; costs limited to party-and-party.
|
7 November 2025 |
|
LPC may seek court orders differing from a DC’s sanction; dishonest attorney struck from the roll.
* Legal Practice – Disciplinary procedure – effect of s 40(8) LPA – DC’s ruling and recommended sanction not final or binding on the Legal Practice Council; Council may seek differing court relief.
* Professional misconduct – misappropriation of trust funds – fit and proper enquiry – dishonest practitioner generally to be struck from roll absent exceptional circumstances.
* Disciplinary proceedings – sui generis; court remains final arbiter whether to suspend or strike off.
|
7 November 2025 |
|
Applicant failed to prove guarantor and surety liability due to unrefuted misrepresentation defence and discovery non‑compliance.
Civil procedure — Discovery — Rule 35(12) and court order to produce documents — failure to comply and obstructive late production; Contract and suretyship — Guarantee under COVID‑19 loan scheme — defence of misrepresentation as to State guarantee; Suretyship — Alleged release from suretyship and evidentiary burden to produce documents; Admissibility/weight of affidavits — replying affidavit deposed to by different deponent lacking personal knowledge.
|
7 November 2025 |
|
Court varied interim Rule 43 order, finding material change and ordering phased, supervised expansion of parental contact.
Children’s Act – best interests of the child; Rule 43(6) – competence and material change; phased contact orders; Family Advocate supervision; parenting coordinator; interim variation of access and monitoring.
|
7 November 2025 |
|
Court varied ex parte interdict: restrained major works, ordered temporary weatherproofing, and suspended structural alteration pending Part B.
* Civil procedure – ex parte interlocutory relief – duty of full and frank disclosure – material non-disclosure may vitiate order. * Uniform Rules 6(8) & 6(12)(c) – anticipation and reconsideration/variation of orders granted in absence of a party. * Interim interdict – prima facie right, irreparable harm, balance of convenience, absence of alternative remedy. * Preservation of property pending substantive dispute – suspension of irreversible works and ordering of temporary protective measures. * Costs – costs in the cause where parties achieve partial success in intra-familial/church disputes.
|
7 November 2025 |
|
Court refused condonation and ordered discovery of financials, tax returns, SASRIA claims and CCTV for damages assessment.
Civil procedure – Rule 35(3) discovery – Whether respondent must discover financial statements, tax returns, insurance claims and CCTV – Court may go behind discovery affidavit where pleadings/documents give reasonable grounds to suppose documents are in possession – Condonation for late affidavit refused – Costs on scale B.
|
7 November 2025 |
|
Amendment to plead a contractual cause of action did not create a new 'debt' for prescription; exception to prescription upheld.
Prescription – Prescription Act s10 and s11 – debt versus cause of action – amendment introducing contractual cause of action did not create new debt where original particulars already raised contract – special plea of prescription dismissed by exception.
|
7 November 2025 |
|
Contractual cancellation for non-payment upheld; bare denial without proof fails — eviction ordered and attorney-and-client costs awarded.
Commercial lease — cancellation for non-payment under contractual breach clause; motion proceedings — bare denial insufficient to raise bona fide dispute of fact (Wightman); onus on debtor to prove payment; lawful eviction ordered; contractual attorney-and-client costs upheld.
|
7 November 2025 |
|
Ejectment granted where lessee failed to prove fraud and remained in rental arrears; partial affirmation of a contract not permitted.
Lease and ejectment—valid cancellation for persistent rental arrears; urgency—commercial urgency may justify hearing; Fraud and non-disclosure—onus on alleging party, no general duty to disclose pre-contractual facts unless special circumstances; Election on fraud—innocent party must rescind whole contract or affirm it entirely; No partial affirmation permitting unilateral reduction of rent; Costs—attorney and client scale including two counsel awarded for contrived defence.
|
6 November 2025 |
|
Late review condoned; procurement award and extension unlawful; profits to be forfeited and disciplinary steps ordered.
Procurement law – emergency procurement and Treasury Instruction TN5; Constitution s217 – fairness, transparency and competitiveness; PFMA duties and irregular expenditure; retrospective appointments, backdating and undeclared conflicts of interest; unjustified enrichment and forfeiture of profits; SIU remedial powers under SIU Act.
|
6 November 2025 |
|
Police officer convicted of murder and attempted murder; circumstantial and child testimony established guilt, premeditation not proven.
Criminal law – Murder and attempted murder – credibility and competency of child witness – circumstantial and ballistic evidence – no forced entry – accused’s inconsistent versions – planning/premeditation not proven – convictions under s51(2) of Act 105 of 1997.
|
6 November 2025 |
|
Court issued interim order directing utility to restore electricity and condoned defective service due to urgency.
Urgent interim relief – condonation of non‑compliance with rules of notice and service – rule nisi – interim interdict directing utility to restore electricity – state directed to ensure compliance.
|
6 November 2025 |
|
Court awards R250,000 general damages to applicant for healed, non‑disabling gunshot injury after default judgment.
* Delict — assessment of general damages for non‑disabling gunshot injury; * Quantum — reliance on objective medical evidence and comparable authorities to avoid disproportionate awards; * Default judgment — liability established by lack of defence; * Procedural note — irregular service of process observed but did not alter quantum determination.
|
6 November 2025 |
|
A suspended prison sentence qualifies for statutory director disqualification and mandates a delinquency declaration under the Companies Act.
Companies Act s69(8)(b)(iv) – director disqualification – suspended prison sentence qualifies as "imprisoned without option of fine"; Companies Act s162(5)(a) – mandatory declaration of delinquent director where person acted while disqualified; statutory interpretation – focus on sentence imposed, not sentence served.
|
6 November 2025 |
|
Applicant failed to prove urgency or misappropriation to justify interim suspension under section 43 LPA.
Legal Practice Act s43 – urgent interim suspension – requirements of urgency and proof of misappropriation or other serious misconduct; jurisdiction of High Court; interdicts as preventive remedies not remedies for historical misconduct; costs consequences of unwarranted urgent set-downs.
|
5 November 2025 |
|
Declarator against the former occupier and eviction of persons occupying through him granted; occupiers given 30 days to vacate.
Eviction (PIE) – declaratory relief where former occupant has vacated; eviction against persons occupying “through or under” a former occupier; service and notice under section 4(2) PIE; audi alteram partem and procedural fairness; just and equitable assessment of eviction (consideration of City report, homelessness risk, alternative accommodation); sheriff authorised to evict; costs against former occupier.
|
5 November 2025 |
|
Municipality liable for injuries from an open manhole; lack of records and darkness negated contributory negligence.
* Municipal liability – duty to maintain public infrastructure – omission to cover open manhole; * Negligence – omission by municipal employees can be wrongful and actionable; * Evidentiary burden – lack of inspection records and witnesses with personal knowledge undermines municipal defence; * Contributory negligence – darkness and removal of warning devices negated plaintiff’s negligence; * Limited resources are not a defence to failing to prevent obvious hazards. |
5 November 2025 |
|
Risk of wrongful conviction on single‑witness evidence engaged constitutional rights; leave granted to petition High Court and appeals to be heard together.
Criminal law — conviction on single witness evidence — cautionary rule — material contradictions — risk of wrongful conviction; Constitutional jurisdiction — whether potential arbitrary deprivation of liberty and breach of fair‑trial rights engages Constitutional Court; Superior Courts Act s17(2)(f) — presidential referral/reconsideration and appealability; Equality and access to courts — disparate outcomes between co‑accused; Remedy — leave to petition High Court (s309C) and consolidation with co‑accused’s appeal.
|
5 November 2025 |
|
A judgment creditor must comply with section 3(4) of the State Liability Act before obtaining a writ against State property; failure renders the writ invalid.
State Liability Act s3 — execution against State property; whether service required by s3(4) is jurisdictional before issuing writ under s3(6); purpose of s3 to make attachment a last resort; State Attorney duties s3(2) do not relieve judgment creditor of s3(4) obligations; non-joinder of registrar not fatal.
|
5 November 2025 |
|
Final winding-up granted where respondent admitted debt and insolvency; condonation for late opposition refused.
* Company law – Liquidation – Final winding-up order – Where respondent does not dispute indebtedness or insolvency, final winding-up appropriate.
* Civil procedure – Condonation – Late notice to oppose – Reliance on commercial negotiations, impecuniosity and health not sufficient to grant condonation.
* Service – Compliance with service requirements for rule nisi supports conversion to final order.
* Practice – Director appearing in person may be heard but cannot create dispute where none exists in papers.
|
5 November 2025 |
|
A writ issued without the creditor complying with section 3(4) of the State Liability Act is unlawful and set aside.
* State Liability Act s 3 – requirements for satisfaction of monetary judgments against the State; service on executive authority, accounting officer, State Attorney and treasury.
* Interpretation – 'may' in s 3(4) is permissive as to election to proceed but mandatory as a precondition if creditor elects to execute.
* Execution – writ issued without compliance with s 3(4) unlawful; attachments set aside.
* Joinder – non-joinder of registrar not fatal to setting aside writ.
|
5 November 2025 |
|
Arrear rental claims are monetary, within magistrates’ court jurisdiction, and no mitigation duty arose absent lease cancellation.
Magistrates’ Courts Act s46 – meaning of “specific performance” – arrear rental claims are monetary (ad pecuniam solvendam) not specific performance; Magistrates’ Courts Act ss28,29,45 – monetary jurisdiction and written consent to magistrate jurisdiction; pre-trial minutes – incorrect legal concessions not binding on court; contractual clause governing mitigation – no duty to mitigate absent lease cancellation.
|
4 November 2025 |