Loading PDF...
This document is 6.1 MB. Do you want to load it?
Cited documents 7
Judgment
4|
Reported
Whether an occupier's ESTA right to family life includes adult/extended family members and how to fairly balance owner's rights.
• Extension of Security of Tenure Act s 6(2)(d) — right to "family life in accordance with the culture of that family"; scope and meaning.
• "Family" not limited to nuclear family; may include adult children and extended family depending on just and equitable balancing.
• "Family life" right must be balanced with owner’s rights — inquiry infused with justice and equity.
• "Culture" under s 6(2)(d) may be associative, but associative issue unnecessary to decide on these facts.
• Admission of new evidence under Rule 31 requires relevance to the issues before the Court.
|
|
Leave to appeal granted on whether a section 9(3) probation report is mandatory before granting an eviction under section 10(1).
Land claims / Eviction — Extension of Security of Tenure Act 62 of 1997 — section 9(3) probation officer report — necessity to request/consider report before s10(1) eviction — alternative accommodation, hardship and constitutional rights — conflicting authorities — leave to appeal granted.
|
|
Reported
The applicant’s pre-existing right of residence was not terminated by dismissal; a probation report is required before eviction.
* Land — ESTA — Termination of occupier’s right of residence — Whether right arising prior to employment contract is preserved and cannot be terminated solely by dismissal under s 8(2).
* ESTA — Definition of occupier and presumptions in ss 3(4) and 3(5) — tacit consent and pre-existing occupation.
* Procedure — s 9(3) ESTA — probation officer’s report is material and required to assist court in assessing just and equitable eviction.
|
|
Competing restitution claims and an incomplete validation report do not justify immediate withdrawal of a land‑claim notice; court issued rule nisi.
Restitution of Land Rights Act – sections 11 and 11A – acceptance, publication, amendment and withdrawal of land-claim notices; standard at acceptance phase (arguable case vs proof); procedural fairness and disclosure by Regional Land Claims Commissioner; competing claimants; reliance on incomplete validation report insufficient for mandamus; appropriate relief is rule nisi to show cause.
|
Act
3|
Citizenship and Immigration
·
Education
·
Environment, Climate and Wildlife
·
Health and Food Safety
·
Human Rights
·
International Law
·
Labour and Employment
·
Public administration
|
|
Human Rights
·
Infrastructure and Transportation
·
Labour and Employment
·
Public administration
|
|
Agriculture and Land
|