Johannesburg Municipal Council v Maserowitz and Maserowitz [1914] ZATPD 84 (10 August 1914)

Reported
Flynote

Practice.-Ord 9 of 1912, secs, 90 and 91.-Procedure on appeal.Appeal to Supreme Com·t.-Provincial Council Ordinance.Validity not in issue.-Assumption that it is valid.

Case summary

Ordinance 9 of 1912 provides (sections 90 and 91) that an applicant who has been refused a licence to trade as a cycle dealer by a municipal council may appea. l against the council's decision to the magistrate: Held, that this provision did not abolish his common law right to apply to the Supreme Court for relief where such refusal ha.d be-en ma.de without his having been given an opportunity of being heard by the council. Where an ordinance passed by a Provincial Council is not patently invalid and is invalidity is not in issue, the Court will assume that it is valid.


Loading PDF...

This document is 646.6 KB. Do you want to load it?

▲ To the top