Carelinsky and Co and Others v Seehoff and Another [1911] ZAWLD 45 (9 November 1911)

lnsolvency - Secured Creditors - Right of General Bondholder to Vote at Meetings - Law 13 of 1895, sec.62

The holder of a general bond does not hold a security for the amount of his preferent claim within the mean of sec.62* of Law 13 of 1895, and his right to vote at meetings of creditors therefor, is not restricted by that section.
(Burger vs. de Villiers, 15 S.C. 180, distinguished.)