Legal Succession to the South African Transport Services Act, 1989

Act 9 of 1989

There are outstanding amendments that have not yet been applied. See the History tab for more information.
Legal Succession to the South African Transport Services Act, 1989

Loading PDF...

This document is 11.3 MB. Do you want to load it?

Error loading PDF
Try reloading the page or downloading the PDF.
Error:
▲ To the top

History of this document

23 December 2008 amendment not yet applied
20 September 2002 amendment not yet applied
22 September 1995 amendment not yet applied
01 March 1994 amendment not yet applied
01 September 1993 amendment not yet applied
25 June 1993 amendment not yet applied
01 May 1992 amendment not yet applied
15 April 1992 amendment not yet applied
05 July 1991 amendment not yet applied
22 May 1991 amendment not yet applied
01 April 1990
Commenced by Legal Succession to the South African Transport Services Act, 1989: Commencement

Note: Date of commencement of Chapters II-VII (sections 6-36) (see section 37)

06 October 1989
Commenced by Legal Succession to the South African Transport Services Act, 1989: Commencement

Note: Date of commencement of whole Act, except Chapters II-VII (sections 6-36) (see section 37)

14 June 1989 amendment not yet applied
Amended by Finance Act, 1989
15 March 1989 this version
01 March 1989
Assented to

Cited documents 0

Documents citing this one 260

Judgment
48
Reported
Reported
Reported

Human rights and fundamental freedoms - Bill of Rights - violation of the right to equality, human dignity and fair labour practices

Reported

Vessel colliding with harbour wall while entering harbour – alleged negligence of the pilot – approach to evidence – unsafe to rely unduly on demeanour instead of the inherent probabilities – expert evidence reconstructing the incident only reliable where the underlying facts on which it is based are established – negligence not shown – negligent failure to retain records – does not warrant striking out defence

Constitutional and administrative law – irregularities in procurement process by organ of state – legality review – self-review – delay – whether unreasonable and should be condoned – just and equitable remedy following declaration of unconstitutionality of contracts – factors relevant to assessment – misconduct by state officials – contracting parties not innocent – remedial discretion – independent engineer appointed to assess value of work – order may be interfered with on appeal only if discretion not exercised judicially – defective record – absence of core bundle – costs.

Act
12
Finance and Money
Infrastructure and Transportation
Infrastructure and Transportation
Communications and Media
Health and Food Safety
Business, Trade and Industry · Energy and Natural Resources · Environment, Climate and Wildlife · Finance and Money · Health and Food Safety
Business, Trade and Industry · Environment, Climate and Wildlife · Finance and Money · Infrastructure and Transportation · Public administration
Environment, Climate and Wildlife
Business, Trade and Industry · Finance and Money · Labour and Employment
Business, Trade and Industry · Energy and Natural Resources · Environment, Climate and Wildlife · Finance and Money · Infrastructure and Transportation
By-law
3
Repealed
Infrastructure and Transportation
Agriculture and Land · Infrastructure and Transportation
Agriculture and Land · Infrastructure and Transportation