South Africa
Meat Safety Act, 2000
Act 40 of 2000
- Published in Government Gazette 21707 on 1 November 2000
- Assented to on 27 October 2000
- Commenced on 1 November 2000
- [This is the version of this document from 1 November 2000.]
1. Definitions
2. National executive officer
3. Delegation and assignment of powers and duties by national executive officer
4. Designation of assignees
5. Assignment of certain functions to provincial executives
6. Suspension of assignment
7. Prohibition of slaughter of animals at places other than abattoirs, and exemptions
8. Approval of slaughter facility
9. Withdrawal or lapsing of registration certificate
10. Instructions with regard to operation of abattoir
11. Essential national standards
12. Meat safety schemes
13. Restriction on importation of meat
14. Restriction on exportation of meat
15. Routine inspections
16. Entry and search of premises
17. Confidentiality
No person may disclose any information which relates to any person and which was acquired by him or her in the performance of his or her functions in terms of this Act, except—18. Appeals
19. Offences and penalties
20. Forfeiture
A court convicting any person of an offence under this Act may, when requested thereto by the public prosecutor, in addition to any other punishment imposed in respect of that offence, order that the meat, animal, animal product, article, book or other document which formed the subject of the charge against that person, be forfeited to the State.21. Presumptions and evidence
In any prosecution under this Act—22. Regulations
23. Delegation
24. Defects in form
A defect in the form of any document which in terms of any law is required to be executed in a particular manner, or in a document issued in terms of this Act, does not render unlawful any administrative act performed in terms of this Act in respect of the matter to which such document relates, and does not constitute a ground for exception to any legal proceedings which may be taken in respect of such matter if the document complies substantially with the applicable legal requirements.25. Repeal of laws, and savings
26. Short title
This Act is called the Meat Safety Act, 2000.History of this document
01 November 2000 this version
Published in Government Gazette 21707
Commenced
27 October 2000
Assented to
Cited documents 2
Act
2|
Dispute Resolution and Mediation
·
Peace and Security
|
Documents citing this one 130
Gazette
117Judgment
8|
Reported
Company not required to register as an engineer under section 18; special plea of non locus standi dismissed.
Engineering Professions Act 46 of 2000 — s 18 registration applies to natural persons in specified categories — juristic persons (companies) need not register as engineers; non locus standi plea for failure to plead individual registration dismissed. Interpretation — statutory definition of 'person' (Interpretation Act) displaced by context; trusts distinguished from companies.
|
|
A consumer’s detailed, specific billing queries constituted a s102(2) dispute, barring disconnection pending municipality’s explanation.
Municipal services — s 102(2) Municipal Systems Act — meaning of "dispute"; requirement to identify specific amount/items; protection from disconnection pending resolution. Municipal billing — duty to provide accurate, comprehensible account details and reconcile estimated readings; onus on municipality to prove correctness of invoices. Interim relief — entitlement to interdict against disconnection where disputes properly raised; interim payment and statement-and-debatement process. Costs — adverse (attorney-and-client) costs where municipality’s conduct impedes resolution.
|
|
Plaintiff's failure to plead statutory registration under the Engineering Profession Act deprived it of locus standi to sue.
Engineering Profession Act 40 of 2000 – section 18(2) – statutory requirement to be registered to practise; Locus standi – sufficiency of pleadings – failure to allege registration deprives plaintiff of locus standi; Special plea of non-locus standi – procedural propriety and consequence; Pleading – leave to amend declaration granted.
|
|
Department must follow its 2011 Procedure Manual; unauthorised sampling and internal "reconsiderations" of statutory appeals are unlawful.
* Administrative law – legitimate expectation and duty to act fairly – departmental procedure manual published and applied creates binding policy. * Meat Safety Act – Procedure Manual: Microbiological Monitoring of Imported Meat (2011) – binding on Department and officials. * Sampling and testing – only authorised, trained persons may collect/handle bacteriological samples; unauthorised sampling unlawful. * Import control – consignments cannot be rejected on tests for organisms not listed in the Manual or on labelling requirements not in statute/regulations. * Appeals – section 18(1) MSA requires appeals to be adjudicated by the Minister or relevant MEC; internal "reconsiderations" by officials unlawful.
|
|
Failure to give timely statutory notice defeated constitutional damages claims, but an opt‑in class action was certified and procedural steps ordered.
Legal Proceedings Act s 3 — statutory pre‑litigation notice for claims against organs of state — condonation requirements (no prescription, good cause, no unreasonable prejudice) — Prescription Act s 12(3) — knowledge of material facts versus legal conclusions — class action certification (opt‑in) and procedural directions — constitutional damages claim and quantification of loss.
|
|
Leave to appeal granted where applicants showed realistic prospects on whether the section 3(1) notice was timeously served.
Administrative law – Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Certain Organs of the State Act s3(1) – condonation for late section 3 notice – procedural non‑compliance versus substantive justice; Civil procedure – Uniform Rules r49(1)(b) timing of leave to appeal from delivery of reasons; Appeals – Superior Courts Act s17 prospects of success.
|
|
Applicant entitled to rebilling and removal of estimated and phantom‑meter charges; lacks locus standi on reseller’s account; interdict refused.
Administrative law – municipal billing – rebilling obligations; locus standi – claims against separate reseller/metering company; evidential sufficiency of deponents with system access; estimates v actual meter readings; removal of erroneously allocated phantom meter charges; interdicts must be specific and executable; punitive costs for procedural misconduct.
|
By-law
4|
Agriculture and Land
·
Health and Food Safety
|
|
Health and Food Safety
|
|
Environment, Climate and Wildlife
|
|
Repealed
Health and Food Safety
|
Government Notice
1|
Environment, Climate and Wildlife
|