This document is 342.4 KB. Do you want to load it?
Cited documents 20
Judgment
18
Reported
|
Reported
|
Reported
|
Reported
|
Reported
|
Reported
|
Reported
|
Reported
|
Reported
|
Reported
|
Act
2
Citizenship and Immigration
·
Education
·
Environment, Climate and Wildlife
·
Health and Food Safety
·
Human Rights
·
International Law
·
Labour and Employment
·
Public administration
|
Documents citing this one 22
Judgment
22
Reported
|
Reported
|
Exception – delictual claim – whether high court correct in upholding exception based on causation – whether exception proceedings appropriate to decide the factual and legal issues raised – appealability – dismissal of an exception not appealable – conclusion that ‘no order is required to be made’ in a conditional application not an appealable order. |
Reported
|
Reported
|
Reported
|
Reported
|
Reported
|
Prescription — delictual claims for damages — unconstitutionality of President’s conduct a component of alleged wrongfulness — whether completion of cause of action delayed until Constitutional Court makes order confirming or declaring unconstitutionality of President’s conduct. Prescription — whether institution of review application by third party in respect of President’s unconstitutional conduct interrupted prescription in respect of plaintiffs’ damages claims — whether intervention by certain plaintiffs in the review interrupted prescription in respect of the damages claims.
|