- Case summary
-
[adverse credibility findings] — [common law development] — [rule 28(1)] — [Magistrate’s Court Rules]
[direct and substantial interest] — [human dignity] — [leave to intervene]
Loading PDF...
This document is 296.9 KB. Do you want to load it?
Cited documents 3
Judgment 3
- National Director of Public Prosecutions v Zuma (573/2008) [2009] ZASCA 1 (12 January 2009)
- Neotel (Pty) Ltd v Telkom SA Soc Ltd and Others (605 of 2016) [2017] ZASCA 47 (31 March 2017)
- South African Riding for Disabled Association v Regional Land Claims Commissioner and Others [2017] ZACC 4 (23 February 2017)
Documents citing this one 6
Judgment 6
- Altron Tmt (Pty) Ltd v City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality and Others (23/075060) [2023] ZAGPPHC 1035 (8 September 2023)
- Helen Suzman Foundation and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Another ( All Truck Drivers Forum and Allied South Africa Intervening) (32323/2022) [2023] ZAGPPHC 64 (10 February 2023)
- Meyers N.N.O. and Others v Nelson Mandela Bay Metropolitan Municipality and Another (2923/2021) [2023] ZAECPEHC 61 (7 September 2023)
- Pienaar and Another v Sassman and Another (25559/2022) [2023] ZAGPPHC 1036 (11 September 2023)
- Road Accident Fund v Newnet Properties (Pty) Ltd and Others (6088/2022) [2022] ZAGPPHC 1099 (6 December 2022)
- Sequeira v Standard Bank of South Africa and Others ; In Re: Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd v Britz and Another (45914/2021) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1267 (27 October 2023)