- Flynote
- EL|Environmental damages|Sustainable development|Environmental duties|Environmental impact and risk assessment
- Case summary
-
The court considered an appeal against a judgment dismissing the appellant’s exception.
The appellant was a property development company and sought to develop property in low-lying areas adjacent to the Disa river. In order to develop these properties the appellant began to lift these properties to four meters above sea level by dumping waste matter and filling in on the properties. This resulted in the 2nd respondent issuing directives to the appellant in terms of section 31A of the Environmental Conservation Act 73 of 1989 (“ECA”), which required the appellant, at its own expense, to engage a freshwater ecologist and other environmental impacts of their actions.
The appellant complied with the directive but alleged that the directive had prevented it from undertaking any further development on the properties that were below the 1:100-year flood line, as well as the properties that were within the wetland boundary as surveyed by the ecologist.
The court below held that section 34(1) of the ECA provided a right to claim for compensation where loss suffered by a claimant arose from limitations placed on the purposes for which land may be used.
This court found that when the directives were issued, the constitutional and statutory obligations to prevent harm to the environment were met. Thus, section 34 of the ECA could not have been directed at providing compensation for actions taken under section 31A as those provisions regulate harmful activities against the environment.
Appeal upheld.
This document is 531.2 KB. Do you want to load it?
Cited documents 6
Judgment 4
- Arun Property Development (Pty) Ltd v City of Cape Town [2014] ZACC 37 (15 December 2014)
- Minister of Minerals and Energy v Agri South Africa (458/2011) [2012] ZASCA 93 (31 May 2012)
- Panamo Properties (Pty) Ltd and Another v Nel NO and Others (35/2014) [2015] ZASCA 76 (27 May 2015)
- Reflect-All 1025 CC and Others v MEC for Public Transport, Roads and Works, Gauteng Provincial Government and Another [2009] ZACC 24 (27 August 2009)